视频脑电图监测区分癫痫性和非癫痫性发作。

Danish medical bulletin Pub Date : 2011-09-01
Mette Borch Nørmark, Jesper Erdal, Troels Wesenberg Kjær
{"title":"视频脑电图监测区分癫痫性和非癫痫性发作。","authors":"Mette Borch Nørmark,&nbsp;Jesper Erdal,&nbsp;Troels Wesenberg Kjær","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epilepsy is often misdiagnosed and approximately one in every four patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy does not have epilepsy, but instead non-epileptic seizures. Video electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for differentiation between epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of VEM as a diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we have investigated the diagnostic outcome of 155 in patients undergoing VEM at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) over a two-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that VEM revealed a diagnosis in 80%. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 38% and epilepsy was rejected in 43% of cases. In the remaining 20% of cases, epilepsy could not be excluded. Among patients who were referred in antiepileptic drug treatment, 29% did not have epilepsy. The highest diagnostic yield was obtained when patients had seizures with ictal electroencephalography paroxysms during VEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several patients without epilepsy are treated as if they had epilepsy. VEM is a costly method, but with a large diagnostic yield and should therefore be used when there is doubt about the diagnosis in patients with relatively frequent seizures. The use of VEM is expedient to make the correct diagnosis, optimize medical treatment of patients with epilepsy and to avoid unnecessary treatment in patients without epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11019,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical bulletin","volume":"58 9","pages":"A4305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video electroencephalography monitoring differentiates between epileptic and non-epileptic seizures.\",\"authors\":\"Mette Borch Nørmark,&nbsp;Jesper Erdal,&nbsp;Troels Wesenberg Kjær\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epilepsy is often misdiagnosed and approximately one in every four patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy does not have epilepsy, but instead non-epileptic seizures. Video electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for differentiation between epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of VEM as a diagnostic tool.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we have investigated the diagnostic outcome of 155 in patients undergoing VEM at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) over a two-year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that VEM revealed a diagnosis in 80%. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 38% and epilepsy was rejected in 43% of cases. In the remaining 20% of cases, epilepsy could not be excluded. Among patients who were referred in antiepileptic drug treatment, 29% did not have epilepsy. The highest diagnostic yield was obtained when patients had seizures with ictal electroencephalography paroxysms during VEM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several patients without epilepsy are treated as if they had epilepsy. VEM is a costly method, but with a large diagnostic yield and should therefore be used when there is doubt about the diagnosis in patients with relatively frequent seizures. The use of VEM is expedient to make the correct diagnosis, optimize medical treatment of patients with epilepsy and to avoid unnecessary treatment in patients without epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>not relevant.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>not relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"58 9\",\"pages\":\"A4305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:癫痫经常被误诊,大约每四个难治性癫痫患者中就有一个没有癫痫,而是非癫痫性发作。视频脑电图监测(VEM)是区分癫痫性和非癫痫性发作的金标准。本研究的目的是探讨VEM作为诊断工具的有效性。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们调查了在哥本哈根大学医院(Rigshospitalet)接受VEM治疗的155例患者两年多的诊断结果。结果:VEM诊断率为80%。38%的患者被诊断为癫痫,43%的患者拒绝接受癫痫治疗。在其余20%的病例中,不能排除癫痫。在接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者中,29%没有癫痫。当患者在VEM期间出现癫痫发作并伴有发作性脑电图发作时,诊断率最高。结论:一些没有癫痫的病人被当作癫痫来治疗。VEM是一种昂贵的方法,但诊断率很高,因此在对相对频繁发作的患者的诊断有疑问时应使用VEM。使用VEM有利于正确诊断,优化癫痫患者的医疗,避免对非癫痫患者进行不必要的治疗。资金:不相关。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video electroencephalography monitoring differentiates between epileptic and non-epileptic seizures.

Introduction: Epilepsy is often misdiagnosed and approximately one in every four patients diagnosed with refractory epilepsy does not have epilepsy, but instead non-epileptic seizures. Video electroencephalography monitoring (VEM) is the gold standard for differentiation between epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of VEM as a diagnostic tool.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study, we have investigated the diagnostic outcome of 155 in patients undergoing VEM at Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) over a two-year period.

Results: The study showed that VEM revealed a diagnosis in 80%. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 38% and epilepsy was rejected in 43% of cases. In the remaining 20% of cases, epilepsy could not be excluded. Among patients who were referred in antiepileptic drug treatment, 29% did not have epilepsy. The highest diagnostic yield was obtained when patients had seizures with ictal electroencephalography paroxysms during VEM.

Conclusion: Several patients without epilepsy are treated as if they had epilepsy. VEM is a costly method, but with a large diagnostic yield and should therefore be used when there is doubt about the diagnosis in patients with relatively frequent seizures. The use of VEM is expedient to make the correct diagnosis, optimize medical treatment of patients with epilepsy and to avoid unnecessary treatment in patients without epilepsy.

Funding: not relevant.

Trial registration: not relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical bulletin
Danish medical bulletin 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信