有没有地方可以做无镇静剂结肠镜检查?

Felix W Leung
{"title":"有没有地方可以做无镇静剂结肠镜检查?","authors":"Felix W Leung","doi":"10.4161/jig.1.1.14592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Usedated colonoscopy is routinely available in many parts of the world. In the US, only educated professionals appear to be knowledgeable enough to request the unsedated option. Colonoscopists have also been willing to perform unsedated colonoscopy when a patient presents without an escort after undergoing bowel purge preparation. While the actual side-effects of sedation are minimal, the escort requirement and time burden of sedation are barriers to the uptake of screening colonoscopy in the US. The recent trend of deep sedation with propofol for screening colonoscopy increases the efficiency of the colonoscopists at significant costs (e.g. anesthetist reimbursement). The options of as needed and on demand sedation permit patients to complete colonoscopy without sedation. The latter appears to be potentially less coercive. Nurses with experience in the unsedated options recognize the benefit of the quick turn-around of the examination room and shortened occupancy of the recovery area. Discharge planning can be optimized due to absence of amnesia. Patients completing unsedated colonoscopy have given their endorsement of the options. Pain and discomfort continue to limit the success rate of cecal intubation to about 80%. A recently described water method (warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation combined with removal of all residual colonic air by suction and residual feces by water exchange) has the potential of decreasing procedural discomfort and enhancing cecal intubation in unsedated colonoscopy. The availability of the novel water method assures colonoscopists that high success rate of cecal intubation can be achieved in the unsedated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"1 1","pages":"19-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109472/pdf/jig0101_0019.pdf","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?\",\"authors\":\"Felix W Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/jig.1.1.14592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Usedated colonoscopy is routinely available in many parts of the world. In the US, only educated professionals appear to be knowledgeable enough to request the unsedated option. Colonoscopists have also been willing to perform unsedated colonoscopy when a patient presents without an escort after undergoing bowel purge preparation. While the actual side-effects of sedation are minimal, the escort requirement and time burden of sedation are barriers to the uptake of screening colonoscopy in the US. The recent trend of deep sedation with propofol for screening colonoscopy increases the efficiency of the colonoscopists at significant costs (e.g. anesthetist reimbursement). The options of as needed and on demand sedation permit patients to complete colonoscopy without sedation. The latter appears to be potentially less coercive. Nurses with experience in the unsedated options recognize the benefit of the quick turn-around of the examination room and shortened occupancy of the recovery area. Discharge planning can be optimized due to absence of amnesia. Patients completing unsedated colonoscopy have given their endorsement of the options. Pain and discomfort continue to limit the success rate of cecal intubation to about 80%. A recently described water method (warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation combined with removal of all residual colonic air by suction and residual feces by water exchange) has the potential of decreasing procedural discomfort and enhancing cecal intubation in unsedated colonoscopy. The availability of the novel water method assures colonoscopists that high success rate of cecal intubation can be achieved in the unsedated patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"19-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109472/pdf/jig0101_0019.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.1.14592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.1.14592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

在世界上许多地方,结肠镜检查是常规的。在美国,似乎只有受过教育的专业人士才有足够的知识要求使用非镇静剂。结肠镜医师也愿意在病人进行肠清洗准备后在没有陪同的情况下进行非镇静结肠镜检查。虽然镇静的实际副作用很小,但镇静的陪护要求和时间负担是美国筛查结肠镜检查的障碍。最近使用异丙酚深度镇静用于结肠镜筛查的趋势以显著的成本(例如麻醉师报销)提高了结肠镜医师的效率。根据需要和按需镇静的选择允许患者在没有镇静的情况下完成结肠镜检查。后者似乎可能不那么具有强制性。有非镇静经验的护士认识到检查室快速周转和缩短恢复区域占用的好处。由于没有健忘症,出院计划可以优化。完成非镇静结肠镜检查的患者对这些选择表示赞同。疼痛和不适继续限制盲肠插管成功率约80%。最近描述的一种水法(温水输注代替空气注入,并通过吸力清除所有残留的结肠空气和通过水交换清除残留的粪便)具有减少手术不适和加强盲肠插管在非镇静结肠镜检查中的潜力。新型水法的可用性保证了结肠镜医师在非镇静患者中获得高成功率的盲肠插管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is there a place for sedationless colonoscopy?

Usedated colonoscopy is routinely available in many parts of the world. In the US, only educated professionals appear to be knowledgeable enough to request the unsedated option. Colonoscopists have also been willing to perform unsedated colonoscopy when a patient presents without an escort after undergoing bowel purge preparation. While the actual side-effects of sedation are minimal, the escort requirement and time burden of sedation are barriers to the uptake of screening colonoscopy in the US. The recent trend of deep sedation with propofol for screening colonoscopy increases the efficiency of the colonoscopists at significant costs (e.g. anesthetist reimbursement). The options of as needed and on demand sedation permit patients to complete colonoscopy without sedation. The latter appears to be potentially less coercive. Nurses with experience in the unsedated options recognize the benefit of the quick turn-around of the examination room and shortened occupancy of the recovery area. Discharge planning can be optimized due to absence of amnesia. Patients completing unsedated colonoscopy have given their endorsement of the options. Pain and discomfort continue to limit the success rate of cecal intubation to about 80%. A recently described water method (warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation combined with removal of all residual colonic air by suction and residual feces by water exchange) has the potential of decreasing procedural discomfort and enhancing cecal intubation in unsedated colonoscopy. The availability of the novel water method assures colonoscopists that high success rate of cecal intubation can be achieved in the unsedated patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信