如何评价CZE方法的分离效率?

Q4 Medicine
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2011-06-01
C Büttner-Merz, U Holzgrabe
{"title":"如何评价CZE方法的分离效率?","authors":"C Büttner-Merz,&nbsp;U Holzgrabe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In trying to estimate the separation efficiency of Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) methods, the resolution (RS), the number of theoretical plates (N) and the peak-to-valley ratio (p/v) are often used assessment criteria. This study demonstrates that these criteria are not as suitable to describe the separation efficiency in case of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE) methods as they are for Liquid Chromatography (LC) methods. The investigations were performed by means of a validated CZE method for the evaluation of tetracyclines and their related substances. Four impurities of tetracycline hydrochloride are described in the European Pharmacopoeia. Three were found in the sample used for our investigations, i.e. epi-tetracycline formed by keto-enol-tautomerism, anhydrotetracyclin and epi-anhydrotetracyline. It could be shown that higher values of these assessment criteria like RS do not necessarily represent better separation. Thus, a discussion on the usefulness of separation selectivity and efficiency as assessment criteria for capillary electrophoresis as well as on the introduction of additional parameters is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2011 1","pages":"81-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to evaluate the separation efficiency of CZE methods?\",\"authors\":\"C Büttner-Merz,&nbsp;U Holzgrabe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In trying to estimate the separation efficiency of Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) methods, the resolution (RS), the number of theoretical plates (N) and the peak-to-valley ratio (p/v) are often used assessment criteria. This study demonstrates that these criteria are not as suitable to describe the separation efficiency in case of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE) methods as they are for Liquid Chromatography (LC) methods. The investigations were performed by means of a validated CZE method for the evaluation of tetracyclines and their related substances. Four impurities of tetracycline hydrochloride are described in the European Pharmacopoeia. Three were found in the sample used for our investigations, i.e. epi-tetracycline formed by keto-enol-tautomerism, anhydrotetracyclin and epi-anhydrotetracyline. It could be shown that higher values of these assessment criteria like RS do not necessarily represent better separation. Thus, a discussion on the usefulness of separation selectivity and efficiency as assessment criteria for capillary electrophoresis as well as on the introduction of additional parameters is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"81-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在评价毛细管电泳(CE)方法的分离效率时,分辨率(RS)、理论板数(N)和峰谷比(p/v)是常用的评价标准。本研究表明,这些标准不适合描述毛细管区带电泳(CZE)方法的分离效率,而适用于液相色谱(LC)方法。采用经验证的CZE法对四环素类药物及其相关物质进行评价。《欧洲药典》对盐酸四环素的四种杂质进行了描述。在我们研究的样品中发现了三种,即由酮烯醇互变异构形成的外四环素、无水四环素和外无水四环素。可以看出,RS等评价标准的值越高,并不一定代表分离越好。因此,有必要讨论分离选择性和效率作为毛细管电泳评价标准的有效性以及引入附加参数的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to evaluate the separation efficiency of CZE methods?

In trying to estimate the separation efficiency of Capillary Electrophoresis (CE) methods, the resolution (RS), the number of theoretical plates (N) and the peak-to-valley ratio (p/v) are often used assessment criteria. This study demonstrates that these criteria are not as suitable to describe the separation efficiency in case of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE) methods as they are for Liquid Chromatography (LC) methods. The investigations were performed by means of a validated CZE method for the evaluation of tetracyclines and their related substances. Four impurities of tetracycline hydrochloride are described in the European Pharmacopoeia. Three were found in the sample used for our investigations, i.e. epi-tetracycline formed by keto-enol-tautomerism, anhydrotetracyclin and epi-anhydrotetracyline. It could be shown that higher values of these assessment criteria like RS do not necessarily represent better separation. Thus, a discussion on the usefulness of separation selectivity and efficiency as assessment criteria for capillary electrophoresis as well as on the introduction of additional parameters is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信