M Seiz, C F Freyschlag, S Schenkel, C Weiss, C Thomé, K Schmieder, W Stummer, J Tuettenberg
{"title":"低级别胶质瘤患者的处理——德国神经外科的一项调查。","authors":"M Seiz, C F Freyschlag, S Schenkel, C Weiss, C Thomé, K Schmieder, W Stummer, J Tuettenberg","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1275351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims of the study: </strong>The diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGG) are multimodal. Today, there is no defined standard in diagnosis and treatment. Controversies are, in general, about a \"wait-and-see\" strategy, diagnostic workup, surgical intervention, postoperative imaging, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The aim of this study is to gain an overview about management strategies of high-volume German neurosurgical departments treating these patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire including diagnostic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters and 5 cases with magnetic resonance imaging data with questions to various treatment options in these patients was sent to all 34 German neurosurgical departments at university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 24 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Centres were divided into those who generally practice a \"wait-and-see\" strategy vs. those who do not or only in highly selected cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher test and Chi (2)-test. Interestingly, 50% of all centres routinely follow a \"wait-and-see\" strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the management of patients with LGG is complex and a simple questionnaire will not be able to define a standard in diagnosis and treatment, this study offers an overview on strategies at high-volume academic centres dealing with these patients. There is consensus to resect superficially located lobar and circumscribed low-grade lesions. However, the differences between centres become apparent with increasing complexity of the lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51241,"journal":{"name":"Central European Neurosurgery","volume":"72 4","pages":"186-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1275351","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of patients with low-grade gliomas - a survey among German neurosurgical departments.\",\"authors\":\"M Seiz, C F Freyschlag, S Schenkel, C Weiss, C Thomé, K Schmieder, W Stummer, J Tuettenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0031-1275351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims of the study: </strong>The diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGG) are multimodal. Today, there is no defined standard in diagnosis and treatment. Controversies are, in general, about a \\\"wait-and-see\\\" strategy, diagnostic workup, surgical intervention, postoperative imaging, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The aim of this study is to gain an overview about management strategies of high-volume German neurosurgical departments treating these patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A questionnaire including diagnostic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters and 5 cases with magnetic resonance imaging data with questions to various treatment options in these patients was sent to all 34 German neurosurgical departments at university hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 24 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Centres were divided into those who generally practice a \\\"wait-and-see\\\" strategy vs. those who do not or only in highly selected cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher test and Chi (2)-test. Interestingly, 50% of all centres routinely follow a \\\"wait-and-see\\\" strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the management of patients with LGG is complex and a simple questionnaire will not be able to define a standard in diagnosis and treatment, this study offers an overview on strategies at high-volume academic centres dealing with these patients. There is consensus to resect superficially located lobar and circumscribed low-grade lesions. However, the differences between centres become apparent with increasing complexity of the lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"72 4\",\"pages\":\"186-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1275351\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of patients with low-grade gliomas - a survey among German neurosurgical departments.
Background and aims of the study: The diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGG) are multimodal. Today, there is no defined standard in diagnosis and treatment. Controversies are, in general, about a "wait-and-see" strategy, diagnostic workup, surgical intervention, postoperative imaging, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up. The aim of this study is to gain an overview about management strategies of high-volume German neurosurgical departments treating these patients.
Material and methods: A questionnaire including diagnostic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative parameters and 5 cases with magnetic resonance imaging data with questions to various treatment options in these patients was sent to all 34 German neurosurgical departments at university hospitals.
Results: In total, 24 questionnaires were returned and analysed. Centres were divided into those who generally practice a "wait-and-see" strategy vs. those who do not or only in highly selected cases. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher test and Chi (2)-test. Interestingly, 50% of all centres routinely follow a "wait-and-see" strategy.
Conclusion: Although the management of patients with LGG is complex and a simple questionnaire will not be able to define a standard in diagnosis and treatment, this study offers an overview on strategies at high-volume academic centres dealing with these patients. There is consensus to resect superficially located lobar and circumscribed low-grade lesions. However, the differences between centres become apparent with increasing complexity of the lesions.