不同吖啶黄浓度对共聚焦激光内镜成像质量的影响。

Chang-Qing Li, Tao Yu, Xiu-Li Zuo, Xiang-Jun Xie, Wen-Bo Li, Chuan-Lian Chu, Fang Zuo, Yan-Qing Li
{"title":"不同吖啶黄浓度对共聚焦激光内镜成像质量的影响。","authors":"Chang-Qing Li,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Xiu-Li Zuo,&nbsp;Xiang-Jun Xie,&nbsp;Wen-Bo Li,&nbsp;Chuan-Lian Chu,&nbsp;Fang Zuo,&nbsp;Yan-Qing Li","doi":"10.4161/jig.1.2.16828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Acriflavine is one of the commonly used staining agents in confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), a newly developed technique allows for real time histological observation of gastrointestinal mucosa, but the concentration is not unified. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of acriflavine with different concentrations on the CLE image quality and to find a sound concentration in clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty four consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal CLE were enrolled into this study. The patients randomly accepted acriflavine in four different concentrations which were the conventional 0.05% and 3 lower ones respectively: 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.005% spraying onto the same focal antrum mucosa during CLE procedures. Differences of Image quality were demonstrated by an objective score system. RESULTS: THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ABOUT IMAGE QUALITY AMONG ACRIFLAVINE CONCENTRATIONS: 0.05%, 0.02% and 0.01%, but 0.005% decreased image quality significantly (P=0.012). And 0.005% was also the only one which decreased general assessment significantly (P=0.01). For the 3 diagnostic value assessment indices, there was no significant difference about nonspecific and even staining, while 0.02% showed significant better polar staining (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acriflavine concentration 0.02% is the best one applied in CLE with the best nuclei staining ability and preserved image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"1 2","pages":"59-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136855/pdf/jig0102_0059.pdf","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects on confocal laser endomicroscopy image quality by different acriflavine concentrations.\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Qing Li,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Xiu-Li Zuo,&nbsp;Xiang-Jun Xie,&nbsp;Wen-Bo Li,&nbsp;Chuan-Lian Chu,&nbsp;Fang Zuo,&nbsp;Yan-Qing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/jig.1.2.16828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Acriflavine is one of the commonly used staining agents in confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), a newly developed technique allows for real time histological observation of gastrointestinal mucosa, but the concentration is not unified. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of acriflavine with different concentrations on the CLE image quality and to find a sound concentration in clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty four consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal CLE were enrolled into this study. The patients randomly accepted acriflavine in four different concentrations which were the conventional 0.05% and 3 lower ones respectively: 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.005% spraying onto the same focal antrum mucosa during CLE procedures. Differences of Image quality were demonstrated by an objective score system. RESULTS: THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ABOUT IMAGE QUALITY AMONG ACRIFLAVINE CONCENTRATIONS: 0.05%, 0.02% and 0.01%, but 0.005% decreased image quality significantly (P=0.012). And 0.005% was also the only one which decreased general assessment significantly (P=0.01). For the 3 diagnostic value assessment indices, there was no significant difference about nonspecific and even staining, while 0.02% showed significant better polar staining (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acriflavine concentration 0.02% is the best one applied in CLE with the best nuclei staining ability and preserved image quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"59-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136855/pdf/jig0102_0059.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.2.16828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.1.2.16828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

背景:吖黄碱是激光共聚焦内镜(CLE)中常用的染色剂之一,是一项新发展起来的技术,可以实时观察胃肠道黏膜的组织学变化,但其浓度并不统一。本研究旨在评价不同浓度吖啶黄对CLE图像质量的影响,并在临床实践中寻找一个较好的浓度。方法:24例连续接受上消化道CLE的患者被纳入本研究。患者随机接受四种不同浓度的吖啶黄,分别为0.05%常规浓度和0.02%、0.01%和0.005%低浓度,在CLE术中喷洒于同一灶性上颌窦粘膜。通过客观评分系统对图像质量差异进行了评价。结果:0.05%、0.02%和0.01%的吖啶黄素浓度对图像质量无显著影响,但0.005%的吖啶黄素浓度显著降低图像质量(P=0.012)。0.005%也是唯一显著降低一般评价的(P=0.01)。3项诊断价值评价指标中,非特异性、均匀性染色差异无统计学意义,极性染色显著优于0.02% (P=0.03)。结论:0.02%的吖啶黄素用于CLE染色效果最佳,且保留的图像质量最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects on confocal laser endomicroscopy image quality by different acriflavine concentrations.

Effects on confocal laser endomicroscopy image quality by different acriflavine concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Acriflavine is one of the commonly used staining agents in confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), a newly developed technique allows for real time histological observation of gastrointestinal mucosa, but the concentration is not unified. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of acriflavine with different concentrations on the CLE image quality and to find a sound concentration in clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty four consecutive patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal CLE were enrolled into this study. The patients randomly accepted acriflavine in four different concentrations which were the conventional 0.05% and 3 lower ones respectively: 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.005% spraying onto the same focal antrum mucosa during CLE procedures. Differences of Image quality were demonstrated by an objective score system. RESULTS: THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE ABOUT IMAGE QUALITY AMONG ACRIFLAVINE CONCENTRATIONS: 0.05%, 0.02% and 0.01%, but 0.005% decreased image quality significantly (P=0.012). And 0.005% was also the only one which decreased general assessment significantly (P=0.01). For the 3 diagnostic value assessment indices, there was no significant difference about nonspecific and even staining, while 0.02% showed significant better polar staining (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Acriflavine concentration 0.02% is the best one applied in CLE with the best nuclei staining ability and preserved image quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信