{"title":"对服务贫困病人的医院来说，按绩效付费有什么影响?","authors":"Sarah Katz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key findings: </strong>(1) After three years of participation in a CMS pay-for-performance initiative, hospitals that served a high number of poor patients realized gains in quality improvement measures on certain clinical conditions. (2) The gains among these hospitals were greater than gains among other hospitals, allowing them to close the gaps seen prior to the onset of pay for performance. (3) Hospitals that served a high number of poor patients started with lower baseline quality performance than other hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":83710,"journal":{"name":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","volume":"13 7","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the effect of pay for performance on hospitals that serve poor patients?\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Katz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Key findings: </strong>(1) After three years of participation in a CMS pay-for-performance initiative, hospitals that served a high number of poor patients realized gains in quality improvement measures on certain clinical conditions. (2) The gains among these hospitals were greater than gains among other hospitals, allowing them to close the gaps seen prior to the onset of pay for performance. (3) Hospitals that served a high number of poor patients started with lower baseline quality performance than other hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Findings brief : health care financing & organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings brief : health care financing & organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the effect of pay for performance on hospitals that serve poor patients?
Key findings: (1) After three years of participation in a CMS pay-for-performance initiative, hospitals that served a high number of poor patients realized gains in quality improvement measures on certain clinical conditions. (2) The gains among these hospitals were greater than gains among other hospitals, allowing them to close the gaps seen prior to the onset of pay for performance. (3) Hospitals that served a high number of poor patients started with lower baseline quality performance than other hospitals.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
