头颈癌三种临床期抗体的比较免疫荧光分析。

Kathrin Schwager, Alessandra Villa, Christoph Rösli, Dario Neri, Maria Rösli-Khabas, Gerhard Moser
{"title":"头颈癌三种临床期抗体的比较免疫荧光分析。","authors":"Kathrin Schwager,&nbsp;Alessandra Villa,&nbsp;Christoph Rösli,&nbsp;Dario Neri,&nbsp;Maria Rösli-Khabas,&nbsp;Gerhard Moser","doi":"10.1186/1758-3284-3-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The antibody-based targeted delivery of bioactive molecules to tumour vasculature is an attractive avenue to concentrate therapeutic agents at cancer sites, while sparing normal organs. L19, F8 and F16 are three fully human monoclonal antibodies, specific to splice isoforms of fibronectin and tenascin-C, which bind to sites of active tissue remodeling and which are currently in Phase I and II clinical trials as radio-immunoconjugates and immunocytokines in patients with cancer and arthritis.In this article, we report the first comparative analysis of expression patterns for the extra domains EDB and EDA of fibronectin and A1 of tenascin-C in both primary and metastatic head and neck cancer lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comparative immunofluorescence analysis with the L19, F8 and F16 antibodies in 40 freshly frozen human head and neck cancer specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, F8 and F16 exhibited similar staining intensities, which were typically stronger than L19. Interestingly, some specimens exhibited striking differences in staining by the three antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggests that an individualized treatment procedure (e.g., choice of L19, F8 or F16 based on immuno-PET or immunofluorescence procedure) may represent the most logical avenue for offering the best possible antibody to any given patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":49195,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-25","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative immunofluorescence analysis of three clinical-stage antibodies in head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kathrin Schwager,&nbsp;Alessandra Villa,&nbsp;Christoph Rösli,&nbsp;Dario Neri,&nbsp;Maria Rösli-Khabas,&nbsp;Gerhard Moser\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1758-3284-3-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The antibody-based targeted delivery of bioactive molecules to tumour vasculature is an attractive avenue to concentrate therapeutic agents at cancer sites, while sparing normal organs. L19, F8 and F16 are three fully human monoclonal antibodies, specific to splice isoforms of fibronectin and tenascin-C, which bind to sites of active tissue remodeling and which are currently in Phase I and II clinical trials as radio-immunoconjugates and immunocytokines in patients with cancer and arthritis.In this article, we report the first comparative analysis of expression patterns for the extra domains EDB and EDA of fibronectin and A1 of tenascin-C in both primary and metastatic head and neck cancer lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comparative immunofluorescence analysis with the L19, F8 and F16 antibodies in 40 freshly frozen human head and neck cancer specimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, F8 and F16 exhibited similar staining intensities, which were typically stronger than L19. Interestingly, some specimens exhibited striking differences in staining by the three antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggests that an individualized treatment procedure (e.g., choice of L19, F8 or F16 based on immuno-PET or immunofluorescence procedure) may represent the most logical avenue for offering the best possible antibody to any given patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-3-25\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-3-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

背景:基于抗体的生物活性分子靶向肿瘤血管递送是一种有吸引力的途径,可以在保留正常器官的情况下将治疗药物集中在癌症部位。L19、F8和F16是三种完全人源单克隆抗体,特异于纤维连接蛋白和腱素c的剪接异构体,它们结合到活跃组织重塑的位点,目前作为放射免疫偶联物和免疫细胞因子在癌症和关节炎患者中处于I期和II期临床试验。在这篇文章中,我们首次报道了纤维连接蛋白的额外结构域EDB和EDA以及tenascin-C的A1在原发性和转移性头颈癌病变中的表达模式的比较分析。方法:对40例新鲜冷冻的人头颈癌标本的L19、F8和F16抗体进行比较免疫荧光分析。结果:F8和F16的平均染色强度相似,均明显强于L19。有趣的是,一些标本在三种抗体的染色上表现出显著的差异。结论:这些结果表明,个体化治疗程序(例如,根据免疫pet或免疫荧光程序选择L19、F8或F16)可能是为任何特定患者提供最佳抗体的最合理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A comparative immunofluorescence analysis of three clinical-stage antibodies in head and neck cancer.

A comparative immunofluorescence analysis of three clinical-stage antibodies in head and neck cancer.

A comparative immunofluorescence analysis of three clinical-stage antibodies in head and neck cancer.

Background: The antibody-based targeted delivery of bioactive molecules to tumour vasculature is an attractive avenue to concentrate therapeutic agents at cancer sites, while sparing normal organs. L19, F8 and F16 are three fully human monoclonal antibodies, specific to splice isoforms of fibronectin and tenascin-C, which bind to sites of active tissue remodeling and which are currently in Phase I and II clinical trials as radio-immunoconjugates and immunocytokines in patients with cancer and arthritis.In this article, we report the first comparative analysis of expression patterns for the extra domains EDB and EDA of fibronectin and A1 of tenascin-C in both primary and metastatic head and neck cancer lesions.

Methods: We performed a comparative immunofluorescence analysis with the L19, F8 and F16 antibodies in 40 freshly frozen human head and neck cancer specimens.

Results: On average, F8 and F16 exhibited similar staining intensities, which were typically stronger than L19. Interestingly, some specimens exhibited striking differences in staining by the three antibodies.

Conclusions: These results suggests that an individualized treatment procedure (e.g., choice of L19, F8 or F16 based on immuno-PET or immunofluorescence procedure) may represent the most logical avenue for offering the best possible antibody to any given patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信