不拔除或两种上颌前磨牙拔除方案对ⅱ类错颌咬合成功率的影响。

World journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Guilherme Janson, Tassiana Mesquita Simão, Sérgio Estelita Barros, Marcos Janson, Marcos Roberto de Freitas
{"title":"不拔除或两种上颌前磨牙拔除方案对ⅱ类错颌咬合成功率的影响。","authors":"Guilherme Janson,&nbsp;Tassiana Mesquita Simão,&nbsp;Sérgio Estelita Barros,&nbsp;Marcos Janson,&nbsp;Marcos Roberto de Freitas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the initial cephalometric characteristics of complete Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extractions and to verify their degree of influence on the occlusal success rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 84 records from patients with complete Class II malocclusions was divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 patients treated with nonextraction at an initial mean age of 12.95 years, while group 2 included 53 patients treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.3 years. Initial and final occlusal statuses were evaluated on dental casts with Grainger's Treatment Priority Index (TPI); the initial cephalometric characteristics were obtained on the pretreatment cephalograms. The initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups were compared by t test. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of all variables in the percentage of TPI reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pretreatment cephalometric characteristics of the two maxillary premolar extraction cases were a greater vertical growth pattern, greater max illary and mandibular incisor protrusion, greater maxillary incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights, and greater upper and lower lip protrusion than the nonextraction group. However, the regression analysis demonstrated that only the extraction protocol was significantly associated with the occlusal success rate in the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that the initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups did not influence the occlusal success rate of the two treatment protocols investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":87213,"journal":{"name":"World journal of orthodontics","volume":"11 4","pages":"e63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Janson,&nbsp;Tassiana Mesquita Simão,&nbsp;Sérgio Estelita Barros,&nbsp;Marcos Janson,&nbsp;Marcos Roberto de Freitas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the initial cephalometric characteristics of complete Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extractions and to verify their degree of influence on the occlusal success rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 84 records from patients with complete Class II malocclusions was divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 patients treated with nonextraction at an initial mean age of 12.95 years, while group 2 included 53 patients treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.3 years. Initial and final occlusal statuses were evaluated on dental casts with Grainger's Treatment Priority Index (TPI); the initial cephalometric characteristics were obtained on the pretreatment cephalograms. The initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups were compared by t test. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of all variables in the percentage of TPI reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pretreatment cephalometric characteristics of the two maxillary premolar extraction cases were a greater vertical growth pattern, greater max illary and mandibular incisor protrusion, greater maxillary incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights, and greater upper and lower lip protrusion than the nonextraction group. However, the regression analysis demonstrated that only the extraction protocol was significantly associated with the occlusal success rate in the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that the initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups did not influence the occlusal success rate of the two treatment protocols investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不拔除或两次拔除上颌前磨牙治疗完全性ⅱ类错颌的初始头颅测量特征,并验证其对咬合成功率的影响程度。方法:将84例完全性ⅱ类错颌患者分为两组。组1包括31例不拔除患者,初始平均年龄12.95岁;组2包括53例两次拔除上颌前磨牙的患者,初始平均年龄13.3岁。采用Grainger治疗优先指数(TPI)评价铸型牙合的初始状态和最终状态;最初的头颅测量特征是在预处理的头颅图像上获得的。采用t检验比较两组初始头颅测量特征。采用多元线性回归分析评价各变量对TPI降低百分比的影响。结果:2例上颌前磨牙拔牙组的前颅测量特征均为垂直生长模式增大,上颌前磨牙和下颌前切牙突出量增大,上颌前切牙和磨牙牙槽高度增大,上下唇突出量增大。然而,回归分析表明,只有拔牙方案与各组咬合成功率有显著相关。结论:这是得出的结论,最初的头测量特征组不影响两种治疗方案的咬合成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.

Aim: To compare the initial cephalometric characteristics of complete Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extractions and to verify their degree of influence on the occlusal success rate.

Methods: A sample of 84 records from patients with complete Class II malocclusions was divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 31 patients treated with nonextraction at an initial mean age of 12.95 years, while group 2 included 53 patients treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.3 years. Initial and final occlusal statuses were evaluated on dental casts with Grainger's Treatment Priority Index (TPI); the initial cephalometric characteristics were obtained on the pretreatment cephalograms. The initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups were compared by t test. A multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of all variables in the percentage of TPI reduction.

Results: The pretreatment cephalometric characteristics of the two maxillary premolar extraction cases were a greater vertical growth pattern, greater max illary and mandibular incisor protrusion, greater maxillary incisor and molar dentoalveolar heights, and greater upper and lower lip protrusion than the nonextraction group. However, the regression analysis demonstrated that only the extraction protocol was significantly associated with the occlusal success rate in the groups.

Conclusions: It was concluded that the initial cephalometric characteristics of the groups did not influence the occlusal success rate of the two treatment protocols investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信