患者报告正畸托槽脱粘过程中的不适和疼痛:两种方法的比较研究。

World journal of orthodontics Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Thiene Silva Normando, Flávio Siqueira Calçada, Weber José da Silva Ursi, David Normando
{"title":"患者报告正畸托槽脱粘过程中的不适和疼痛:两种方法的比较研究。","authors":"Thiene Silva Normando,&nbsp;Flávio Siqueira Calçada,&nbsp;Weber José da Silva Ursi,&nbsp;David Normando","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the level of discomfort and pain reported by patients during debonding of orthodontic metallic brackets by comparing two of the most popular methods, since discomfort can negatively influence patients' motivation to undergo orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This split-mouth designed study involved 37 patients. Two methods were used for bracket removal: a lift-off debonding instrument and a ligature-cutting plier. The level of discomfort during debonding was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 4; The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was taken into consideration, as well. Comparison between the methods was statistically analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank and chi-squared tests (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the remnant adhesive, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Patients' reports of pain (score ≥2) were observed in 24.3% of teeth when the brackets were removed using a ligature-cutting plier, while there was a 12.8% report of pain when the lift-off instrument was employed (odds ratio [OR]=2.17, P<.001, χ(2)=17.7). Statistically significant lower scores for maxillary (P=.02) and mandibular central incisors (P=.02), maxillary lateral incisors (P=.02), mandibular canines (P=.00), and mandibular premolars (P=.00/.02) were reported when the lift-off instrument was employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the removal of orthodontic brackets, the lift-off instrument is better accepted by patients compared to the ligature cutting pliers, given that reports of pain are about two times lower with the former. The ARI was the same for both methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":87213,"journal":{"name":"World journal of orthodontics","volume":"11 4","pages":"e29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' report of discomfort and pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of two methods.\",\"authors\":\"Thiene Silva Normando,&nbsp;Flávio Siqueira Calçada,&nbsp;Weber José da Silva Ursi,&nbsp;David Normando\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the level of discomfort and pain reported by patients during debonding of orthodontic metallic brackets by comparing two of the most popular methods, since discomfort can negatively influence patients' motivation to undergo orthodontic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This split-mouth designed study involved 37 patients. Two methods were used for bracket removal: a lift-off debonding instrument and a ligature-cutting plier. The level of discomfort during debonding was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 4; The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was taken into consideration, as well. Comparison between the methods was statistically analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank and chi-squared tests (P<.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the remnant adhesive, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Patients' reports of pain (score ≥2) were observed in 24.3% of teeth when the brackets were removed using a ligature-cutting plier, while there was a 12.8% report of pain when the lift-off instrument was employed (odds ratio [OR]=2.17, P<.001, χ(2)=17.7). Statistically significant lower scores for maxillary (P=.02) and mandibular central incisors (P=.02), maxillary lateral incisors (P=.02), mandibular canines (P=.00), and mandibular premolars (P=.00/.02) were reported when the lift-off instrument was employed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the removal of orthodontic brackets, the lift-off instrument is better accepted by patients compared to the ligature cutting pliers, given that reports of pain are about two times lower with the former. The ARI was the same for both methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"e29-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过比较两种最流行的方法,研究正畸金属托槽脱粘过程中患者报告的不适和疼痛程度,因为不适会对患者接受正畸治疗的动机产生负面影响。方法:采用裂口设计的研究方法,共纳入37例患者。采用两种方法去除支架:起吊式脱粘仪和结扎钳。在剥离过程中,不适程度以0到4的等级进行评估;同时还考虑了粘接残余指数(ARI)。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和卡方检验对两种方法的比较进行统计学分析(结果:对于残余粘接剂,两种方法之间无显著差异。使用剪扎钳拔除托槽时,有24.3%的患者报告疼痛(评分≥2),而使用拔除托槽时,有12.8%的患者报告疼痛(比值比[OR]=2.17, p)。结论:拔除托槽时,拔除托槽时,患者对拔除托槽的接受程度较使用剪扎钳低2倍左右,因此拔除托槽时,患者对拔除托槽的接受程度较高。两种方法的ARI是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' report of discomfort and pain during debonding of orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of two methods.

Aim: To examine the level of discomfort and pain reported by patients during debonding of orthodontic metallic brackets by comparing two of the most popular methods, since discomfort can negatively influence patients' motivation to undergo orthodontic treatment.

Methods: This split-mouth designed study involved 37 patients. Two methods were used for bracket removal: a lift-off debonding instrument and a ligature-cutting plier. The level of discomfort during debonding was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 4; The Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) was taken into consideration, as well. Comparison between the methods was statistically analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank and chi-squared tests (P<.05).

Results: Regarding the remnant adhesive, no significant difference was observed between the methods. Patients' reports of pain (score ≥2) were observed in 24.3% of teeth when the brackets were removed using a ligature-cutting plier, while there was a 12.8% report of pain when the lift-off instrument was employed (odds ratio [OR]=2.17, P<.001, χ(2)=17.7). Statistically significant lower scores for maxillary (P=.02) and mandibular central incisors (P=.02), maxillary lateral incisors (P=.02), mandibular canines (P=.00), and mandibular premolars (P=.00/.02) were reported when the lift-off instrument was employed.

Conclusion: For the removal of orthodontic brackets, the lift-off instrument is better accepted by patients compared to the ligature cutting pliers, given that reports of pain are about two times lower with the former. The ARI was the same for both methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信