导航经皮腰骶椎间融合术的可行性研究。

Q Medicine
Computer Aided Surgery Pub Date : 2011-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-03-07 DOI:10.3109/10929088.2011.559412
Yu Wang, Dang Q S Le, Haisheng Li, Miao Wang, Cody Eric Bünger
{"title":"导航经皮腰骶椎间融合术的可行性研究。","authors":"Yu Wang,&nbsp;Dang Q S Le,&nbsp;Haisheng Li,&nbsp;Miao Wang,&nbsp;Cody Eric Bünger","doi":"10.3109/10929088.2011.559412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in surgical navigation have opened new possibilities for lumbosacral interbody fusion procedures. We have designed a novel navigated surgical method, Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF), that enables lumbosacral discectomy and bone grafting to be performed percutaneously and safely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prove that NPLSIF is feasible from an anatomical perspective, it was simulated on 3D models of the lumbosacral spine created using CT data from 60 patients. Feasibility would be verified if both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw could be accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. In addition, the discectomy that could be achieved using NPLSIF was evaluated, and a surgical experiment was performed using a plastic torso model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D modeling and surgical simulation were successfully completed in all cases. The feasibility of the NPLSIF approach was verified in every case, i.e., both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw were accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. The mean ratio of the area of discectomy that could be achieved by NPLSIF to the total area of the lumbosacral disc was 0.721 ±  0.065 (range: 0.57-0.894), 0.956  ±  0.045 (range: 0.8-1.0) and 0.945  ±  0.058 (range: 0.813-1.0) in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. NPLSIF was also successfully executed on the plastic torso model. Preoperative planning on the navigation workstation took 5 minutes and each intraoperative CT scan took 30 seconds. Locating the entry point of the working corridor according to the preoperative plan took 3 minutes. Postoperative CT images and direct viewing of the plastic model revealed no penetration of the spinal canal or sacral wall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The feasibility of Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF) was verified from an anatomical perspective. We also demonstrated that an adequate discectomy can be achieved using the procedure. Cadaveric experiments and clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of NPLSIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":50644,"journal":{"name":"Computer Aided Surgery","volume":"16 3","pages":"135-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2011.559412","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigated percutaneous lumbosacral interbody fusion: a feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wang,&nbsp;Dang Q S Le,&nbsp;Haisheng Li,&nbsp;Miao Wang,&nbsp;Cody Eric Bünger\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10929088.2011.559412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advances in surgical navigation have opened new possibilities for lumbosacral interbody fusion procedures. We have designed a novel navigated surgical method, Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF), that enables lumbosacral discectomy and bone grafting to be performed percutaneously and safely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prove that NPLSIF is feasible from an anatomical perspective, it was simulated on 3D models of the lumbosacral spine created using CT data from 60 patients. Feasibility would be verified if both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw could be accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. In addition, the discectomy that could be achieved using NPLSIF was evaluated, and a surgical experiment was performed using a plastic torso model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3D modeling and surgical simulation were successfully completed in all cases. The feasibility of the NPLSIF approach was verified in every case, i.e., both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw were accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. The mean ratio of the area of discectomy that could be achieved by NPLSIF to the total area of the lumbosacral disc was 0.721 ±  0.065 (range: 0.57-0.894), 0.956  ±  0.045 (range: 0.8-1.0) and 0.945  ±  0.058 (range: 0.813-1.0) in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. NPLSIF was also successfully executed on the plastic torso model. Preoperative planning on the navigation workstation took 5 minutes and each intraoperative CT scan took 30 seconds. Locating the entry point of the working corridor according to the preoperative plan took 3 minutes. Postoperative CT images and direct viewing of the plastic model revealed no penetration of the spinal canal or sacral wall.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The feasibility of Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF) was verified from an anatomical perspective. We also demonstrated that an adequate discectomy can be achieved using the procedure. Cadaveric experiments and clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of NPLSIF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"135-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10929088.2011.559412\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Aided Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2011.559412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Aided Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10929088.2011.559412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

导读:外科导航技术的进步为腰骶椎间融合手术开辟了新的可能性。我们设计了一种新的导航手术方法,导航经皮腰骶椎体间融合术(NPLSIF),使腰骶椎间盘切除术和植骨术可以经皮安全地进行。方法:为了从解剖学角度证明NPLSIF是可行的,我们利用60例患者的CT数据建立了腰骶棘三维模型进行模拟。如果工作通道和S1椎弓根螺钉都能被安置在骶翼,而不重叠,不穿透椎管或骶前壁或上壁,则验证其可行性。此外,评估了使用NPLSIF可以实现的椎间盘切除术,并使用塑料躯干模型进行了外科实验。结果:所有病例均成功完成三维建模和手术模拟。NPLSIF入路的可行性在每个病例中都得到了验证,即工作通道和S1椎弓根螺钉都被安置在骶翼中,没有重叠,也没有穿透椎管或骶前壁或上壁。NPLSIF在轴、冠、矢状面切除椎间盘面积与腰骶盘总面积的平均比值分别为0.721±0.065(范围0.57 ~ 0.894)、0.956±0.045(范围0.8 ~ 1.0)、0.945±0.058(范围0.813 ~ 1.0)。NPLSIF也成功地在塑料躯干模型上执行。导航工作站的术前规划耗时5分钟,术中CT每次扫描耗时30秒。根据术前计划定位工作通道入口需要3分钟。术后CT图像和直接观察塑料模型显示没有穿透椎管或骶骨壁。结论:从解剖学角度验证了导航经皮腰骶椎间融合术(NPLSIF)的可行性。我们还证明,使用该方法可以实现充分的椎间盘切除术。需要进一步的尸体实验和临床试验来评估NPLSIF的疗效和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigated percutaneous lumbosacral interbody fusion: a feasibility study.

Introduction: Advances in surgical navigation have opened new possibilities for lumbosacral interbody fusion procedures. We have designed a novel navigated surgical method, Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF), that enables lumbosacral discectomy and bone grafting to be performed percutaneously and safely.

Methods: To prove that NPLSIF is feasible from an anatomical perspective, it was simulated on 3D models of the lumbosacral spine created using CT data from 60 patients. Feasibility would be verified if both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw could be accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. In addition, the discectomy that could be achieved using NPLSIF was evaluated, and a surgical experiment was performed using a plastic torso model.

Results: The 3D modeling and surgical simulation were successfully completed in all cases. The feasibility of the NPLSIF approach was verified in every case, i.e., both the working corridor and the S1 pedicle screw were accommodated in the sacral ala without overlapping and without penetrating either the spinal canal or the anterior or upper sacral wall. The mean ratio of the area of discectomy that could be achieved by NPLSIF to the total area of the lumbosacral disc was 0.721 ±  0.065 (range: 0.57-0.894), 0.956  ±  0.045 (range: 0.8-1.0) and 0.945  ±  0.058 (range: 0.813-1.0) in the axial, coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. NPLSIF was also successfully executed on the plastic torso model. Preoperative planning on the navigation workstation took 5 minutes and each intraoperative CT scan took 30 seconds. Locating the entry point of the working corridor according to the preoperative plan took 3 minutes. Postoperative CT images and direct viewing of the plastic model revealed no penetration of the spinal canal or sacral wall.

Conclusion: The feasibility of Navigated Percutaneous Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion (NPLSIF) was verified from an anatomical perspective. We also demonstrated that an adequate discectomy can be achieved using the procedure. Cadaveric experiments and clinical trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and efficiency of NPLSIF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Aided Surgery
Computer Aided Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.75
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Computer Aided Surgery encompasses all fields within surgery, as well as biomedical imaging and instrumentation, and digital technology employed as an adjunct to imaging in diagnosis, therapeutics, and surgery. Topics featured include frameless as well as conventional stereotaxic procedures, surgery guided by ultrasound, image guided focal irradiation, robotic surgery, and other therapeutic interventions that are performed with the use of digital imaging technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信