Wiesław Kaczmarek, Przemysław Ceglarz, Jakub Kucharski, Patryk Nikratowicz, Andrzej Pucher, Krzysztof Pietrzak
{"title":"[股骨粗隆间截骨术治疗髋关节骨关节炎的疗效与不良回顾性分析]。","authors":"Wiesław Kaczmarek, Przemysław Ceglarz, Jakub Kucharski, Patryk Nikratowicz, Andrzej Pucher, Krzysztof Pietrzak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To predict the final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>56 hips in 53 patients after intertrochanteric osteotomy without any change in neck-shaft angle were enrolled into the analysis. 26 hips with a good result of intertrochanteric osteotomy were included into A group and 26 hips with a poor result were included into B group. The follow up was 5 to 11 years. Such preoperative parameters as: age and body weight of patients, severity of arthritis, sphericity of the head, joint space width, center-edge angle, pain severity, walking capacity, range of motion- were analyzed in both groups of patients. Survival of the hips was estimated with a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last follow up 27 hips (26 patients) were converted into hip prosthesis. The mean operative age of the patients in group A was 37.8 years and in group B 43.4 years. The severity of hip arthritis was similar in both groups of patients. Regular spherical head was found in 10 hips of group A and in 12 of B group. The center-edge angle was 15 degrees in group A and 18 degrees in group B. The joint space width was 2.6 mm in group A, and 2.5 mm in B group. Walking capacity, pain severity, range of motion of the affected hip was very similar in both groups of patients. Patients of group B had hip prosthesis already implanted 2.8 years after osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found between analyzed preoperative parameters in patients with good and poor results of intertrochanteric osteotomy. The final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy is not predictable.</p>","PeriodicalId":75702,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","volume":"75 4","pages":"220-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The retrospective analysis of good and poor results of the intertrochanteric osteotomy for hip osteoarthritis].\",\"authors\":\"Wiesław Kaczmarek, Przemysław Ceglarz, Jakub Kucharski, Patryk Nikratowicz, Andrzej Pucher, Krzysztof Pietrzak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To predict the final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>56 hips in 53 patients after intertrochanteric osteotomy without any change in neck-shaft angle were enrolled into the analysis. 26 hips with a good result of intertrochanteric osteotomy were included into A group and 26 hips with a poor result were included into B group. The follow up was 5 to 11 years. Such preoperative parameters as: age and body weight of patients, severity of arthritis, sphericity of the head, joint space width, center-edge angle, pain severity, walking capacity, range of motion- were analyzed in both groups of patients. Survival of the hips was estimated with a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At last follow up 27 hips (26 patients) were converted into hip prosthesis. The mean operative age of the patients in group A was 37.8 years and in group B 43.4 years. The severity of hip arthritis was similar in both groups of patients. Regular spherical head was found in 10 hips of group A and in 12 of B group. The center-edge angle was 15 degrees in group A and 18 degrees in group B. The joint space width was 2.6 mm in group A, and 2.5 mm in B group. Walking capacity, pain severity, range of motion of the affected hip was very similar in both groups of patients. Patients of group B had hip prosthesis already implanted 2.8 years after osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found between analyzed preoperative parameters in patients with good and poor results of intertrochanteric osteotomy. The final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy is not predictable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska\",\"volume\":\"75 4\",\"pages\":\"220-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:预测粗隆间截骨术的最终疗效。材料与方法:选取53例股骨粗隆间截骨术后颈干角未发生改变的患者56髋进行分析。将粗隆间截骨效果良好的26髋分为a组,结果不佳的26髋分为B组。随访时间为5到11年。分析两组患者的术前参数:患者年龄、体重、关节炎严重程度、头部球形度、关节间隙宽度、中心边缘角、疼痛严重程度、行走能力、活动范围。用Kaplan-Meyer生存曲线估计髋部的生存率。结果:最后随访27髋(26例)置换人工髋关节。A组平均手术年龄37.8岁,B组平均手术年龄43.4岁。两组患者髋关节关节炎的严重程度相似。A组10例髋部呈规则球形,B组12例。中心边缘角A组为15°,B组为18°,关节间隙宽度A组为2.6 mm, B组为2.5 mm。两组患者的行走能力,疼痛严重程度,受影响髋关节的活动范围非常相似。B组患者截骨后2.8年已植入人工髋关节。结论:粗隆间截骨术效果好与效果差患者术前参数分析差异无统计学意义。粗隆间截骨术的最终结果是不可预测的。
[The retrospective analysis of good and poor results of the intertrochanteric osteotomy for hip osteoarthritis].
Objectives: To predict the final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy.
Materials and methods: 56 hips in 53 patients after intertrochanteric osteotomy without any change in neck-shaft angle were enrolled into the analysis. 26 hips with a good result of intertrochanteric osteotomy were included into A group and 26 hips with a poor result were included into B group. The follow up was 5 to 11 years. Such preoperative parameters as: age and body weight of patients, severity of arthritis, sphericity of the head, joint space width, center-edge angle, pain severity, walking capacity, range of motion- were analyzed in both groups of patients. Survival of the hips was estimated with a Kaplan-Meyer survival curve.
Results: At last follow up 27 hips (26 patients) were converted into hip prosthesis. The mean operative age of the patients in group A was 37.8 years and in group B 43.4 years. The severity of hip arthritis was similar in both groups of patients. Regular spherical head was found in 10 hips of group A and in 12 of B group. The center-edge angle was 15 degrees in group A and 18 degrees in group B. The joint space width was 2.6 mm in group A, and 2.5 mm in B group. Walking capacity, pain severity, range of motion of the affected hip was very similar in both groups of patients. Patients of group B had hip prosthesis already implanted 2.8 years after osteotomy.
Conclusions: No statistically significant difference was found between analyzed preoperative parameters in patients with good and poor results of intertrochanteric osteotomy. The final result of intertrochanteric osteotomy is not predictable.