颈动脉狭窄管理的最新概念综述。

Norman R Hertzer
{"title":"颈动脉狭窄管理的最新概念综述。","authors":"Norman R Hertzer","doi":"10.3410/M2-91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several large randomized clinical trials in North America and Europe concluded over a decade ago that carotid endarterectomy plus medical management was significantly better than medical management alone for stroke prevention in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis. Percutaneous carotid angioplasty now represents yet another treatment option that currently appears to have a higher risk than endarterectomy in symptomatic patients as well as in those who are 70 years of age or older. For these reasons, there is a consensus that angioplasty should be used cautiously in such patients and probably remains most appropriate either in the context of ongoing randomized trials or for patients who are at a higher-than-average risk for conventional surgical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":88480,"journal":{"name":"F1000 medicine reports","volume":"2 ","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/ce/medrep-02-91.PMC3026621.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An updated review of current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Norman R Hertzer\",\"doi\":\"10.3410/M2-91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several large randomized clinical trials in North America and Europe concluded over a decade ago that carotid endarterectomy plus medical management was significantly better than medical management alone for stroke prevention in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis. Percutaneous carotid angioplasty now represents yet another treatment option that currently appears to have a higher risk than endarterectomy in symptomatic patients as well as in those who are 70 years of age or older. For these reasons, there is a consensus that angioplasty should be used cautiously in such patients and probably remains most appropriate either in the context of ongoing randomized trials or for patients who are at a higher-than-average risk for conventional surgical treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000 medicine reports\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/ce/medrep-02-91.PMC3026621.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000 medicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3410/M2-91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000 medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3410/M2-91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

十多年前,北美和欧洲的几项大型随机临床试验得出结论,对于有症状或无症状的严重颈动脉狭窄患者,颈动脉内膜切除术加药物治疗明显优于单独药物治疗预防卒中。经皮颈动脉成形术现在是另一种治疗选择,目前在有症状的患者以及70岁或以上的患者中,其风险似乎高于动脉内膜切除术。由于这些原因,人们一致认为血管成形术在此类患者中应谨慎使用,并且可能在正在进行的随机试验背景下或在常规手术治疗风险高于平均水平的患者中仍然是最合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An updated review of current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

An updated review of current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

An updated review of current concepts in the management of carotid stenosis.

Several large randomized clinical trials in North America and Europe concluded over a decade ago that carotid endarterectomy plus medical management was significantly better than medical management alone for stroke prevention in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis. Percutaneous carotid angioplasty now represents yet another treatment option that currently appears to have a higher risk than endarterectomy in symptomatic patients as well as in those who are 70 years of age or older. For these reasons, there is a consensus that angioplasty should be used cautiously in such patients and probably remains most appropriate either in the context of ongoing randomized trials or for patients who are at a higher-than-average risk for conventional surgical treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信