一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,旨在评估奈拉美珊对中重度主观性耳鸣患者的疗效和安全性。

Q2 Medicine
Markus Suckfüll, Michael Althaus, Barbara Ellers-Lenz, Alexander Gebauer, Roman Görtelmeyer, Pawel J Jastreboff, Hans J Moebius, Tanja Rosenberg, Hermann Russ, Yvonne Wirth, Hagen Krueger
{"title":"一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验,旨在评估奈拉美珊对中重度主观性耳鸣患者的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Markus Suckfüll,&nbsp;Michael Althaus,&nbsp;Barbara Ellers-Lenz,&nbsp;Alexander Gebauer,&nbsp;Roman Görtelmeyer,&nbsp;Pawel J Jastreboff,&nbsp;Hans J Moebius,&nbsp;Tanja Rosenberg,&nbsp;Hermann Russ,&nbsp;Yvonne Wirth,&nbsp;Hagen Krueger","doi":"10.1186/1472-6815-11-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neramexane is a new substance that exhibits antagonistic properties at α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, suggesting potential efficacy in the treatment of tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 431 outpatients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (onset 3-18 months before screening) were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or neramexane mesylate (25 mg/day, 50 mg/day and 75 mg/day) for 16 weeks, with assessment at 4-week intervals. The primary (intention-to-treat) efficacy analysis was based on the change from baseline in Week 16 in the total score of the adapted German short version of the validated Tinnitus Handicap Inventory questionnaire (THI-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with placebo, the largest improvement was achieved in the 50 mg/d neramexane group, followed by the 75 mg/d neramexane group. This treatment difference did not reach statistical significance at the pre-defined endpoint in Week 16 (p = 0.098 for 50 mg/d; p = 0.289 for 75 mg/d neramexane), but consistent numerical superiority of both neramexane groups compared with placebo was observed. Four weeks after the end of treatment, THI-12 scores in the 50 mg/d group were significantly better than those of the controls. Secondary efficacy variables supported this trend, with p values of < 0.05 for the 50 mg/d neramexane group associated with the functional-communicational subscores of the THI-12 and the assessments of tinnitus annoyance and tinnitus impact on life as measured on an 11-point Likert-like scale. No relevant changes were observed for puretone threshold, for tinnitus pitch and loudness match, or for minimum masking levels. The 25 mg/d neramexane group did not differ from placebo. Neramexane was generally well tolerated and had no relevant influence on laboratory values, electrocardiography and vital signs. Dizziness was the most common adverse event and showed a clear dose-dependence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the safety and tolerability of neramexane treatment in patients with moderate to severe tinnitus. The primary efficacy variable showed a trend towards improvement of tinnitus suffering in the medium- and high-dose neramexane groups. This finding is in line with consistent beneficial effects observed in secondary assessment variables. These results allow appropriate dose selection for further studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00405886.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6815-11-1","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.\",\"authors\":\"Markus Suckfüll,&nbsp;Michael Althaus,&nbsp;Barbara Ellers-Lenz,&nbsp;Alexander Gebauer,&nbsp;Roman Görtelmeyer,&nbsp;Pawel J Jastreboff,&nbsp;Hans J Moebius,&nbsp;Tanja Rosenberg,&nbsp;Hermann Russ,&nbsp;Yvonne Wirth,&nbsp;Hagen Krueger\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6815-11-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neramexane is a new substance that exhibits antagonistic properties at α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, suggesting potential efficacy in the treatment of tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 431 outpatients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (onset 3-18 months before screening) were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or neramexane mesylate (25 mg/day, 50 mg/day and 75 mg/day) for 16 weeks, with assessment at 4-week intervals. The primary (intention-to-treat) efficacy analysis was based on the change from baseline in Week 16 in the total score of the adapted German short version of the validated Tinnitus Handicap Inventory questionnaire (THI-12).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with placebo, the largest improvement was achieved in the 50 mg/d neramexane group, followed by the 75 mg/d neramexane group. This treatment difference did not reach statistical significance at the pre-defined endpoint in Week 16 (p = 0.098 for 50 mg/d; p = 0.289 for 75 mg/d neramexane), but consistent numerical superiority of both neramexane groups compared with placebo was observed. Four weeks after the end of treatment, THI-12 scores in the 50 mg/d group were significantly better than those of the controls. Secondary efficacy variables supported this trend, with p values of < 0.05 for the 50 mg/d neramexane group associated with the functional-communicational subscores of the THI-12 and the assessments of tinnitus annoyance and tinnitus impact on life as measured on an 11-point Likert-like scale. No relevant changes were observed for puretone threshold, for tinnitus pitch and loudness match, or for minimum masking levels. The 25 mg/d neramexane group did not differ from placebo. Neramexane was generally well tolerated and had no relevant influence on laboratory values, electrocardiography and vital signs. Dizziness was the most common adverse event and showed a clear dose-dependence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the safety and tolerability of neramexane treatment in patients with moderate to severe tinnitus. The primary efficacy variable showed a trend towards improvement of tinnitus suffering in the medium- and high-dose neramexane groups. This finding is in line with consistent beneficial effects observed in secondary assessment variables. These results allow appropriate dose selection for further studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00405886.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6815-11-1\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-11-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-11-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

背景:Neramexane是一种对α9α10胆碱能烟碱受体和n -甲基- d -天冬氨酸受体具有拮抗作用的新物质,提示其治疗耳鸣的潜在疗效。方法:共431例中重度主观性耳鸣门诊患者(筛查前3-18个月发病)随机分为安慰剂组和甲磺酸奈美沙尼组(25 mg/天、50 mg/天和75 mg/天),疗程为16周,每隔4周进行评估。主要(意向-治疗)疗效分析是基于第16周时经过验证的耳鸣障碍问卷(THI-12)的改编德文短版总分与基线的变化。结果:与安慰剂相比,50 mg/d奈拉美珊组改善最大,其次是75 mg/d奈拉美珊组。在第16周的预定终点,这种治疗差异没有达到统计学意义(50 mg/d组p = 0.098;75 mg/d奈拉美沙尼组P = 0.289),但观察到奈拉美沙尼组与安慰剂组相比具有一致的数值优势。治疗结束后4周,50 mg/d组THI-12评分明显优于对照组。次要疗效变量支持这一趋势,50 mg/d奈拉美沙尼组与THI-12的功能交流评分以及耳鸣烦恼和耳鸣对生活影响的评估(以11分Likert-like量表测量)相关的p值< 0.05。纯酮阈值、耳鸣音高和响度匹配或最低掩蔽水平均未观察到相关变化。25毫克/天的奈拉美珊组与安慰剂组没有差异。Neramexane一般耐受性良好,对实验室值、心电图和生命体征无相关影响。头晕是最常见的不良反应,并表现出明显的剂量依赖性。结论:本研究证明了奈拉美珊治疗中重度耳鸣患者的安全性和耐受性。主要疗效变量显示中剂量和高剂量奈拉美珊组耳鸣症状有改善的趋势。这一发现与在次要评估变量中观察到的一致的有益效果一致。这些结果为进一步的研究提供了适当的剂量选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00405886。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neramexane in patients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus.

Background: Neramexane is a new substance that exhibits antagonistic properties at α9α10 cholinergic nicotinic receptors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, suggesting potential efficacy in the treatment of tinnitus.

Methods: A total of 431 outpatients with moderate to severe subjective tinnitus (onset 3-18 months before screening) were assigned randomly to receive either placebo or neramexane mesylate (25 mg/day, 50 mg/day and 75 mg/day) for 16 weeks, with assessment at 4-week intervals. The primary (intention-to-treat) efficacy analysis was based on the change from baseline in Week 16 in the total score of the adapted German short version of the validated Tinnitus Handicap Inventory questionnaire (THI-12).

Results: Compared with placebo, the largest improvement was achieved in the 50 mg/d neramexane group, followed by the 75 mg/d neramexane group. This treatment difference did not reach statistical significance at the pre-defined endpoint in Week 16 (p = 0.098 for 50 mg/d; p = 0.289 for 75 mg/d neramexane), but consistent numerical superiority of both neramexane groups compared with placebo was observed. Four weeks after the end of treatment, THI-12 scores in the 50 mg/d group were significantly better than those of the controls. Secondary efficacy variables supported this trend, with p values of < 0.05 for the 50 mg/d neramexane group associated with the functional-communicational subscores of the THI-12 and the assessments of tinnitus annoyance and tinnitus impact on life as measured on an 11-point Likert-like scale. No relevant changes were observed for puretone threshold, for tinnitus pitch and loudness match, or for minimum masking levels. The 25 mg/d neramexane group did not differ from placebo. Neramexane was generally well tolerated and had no relevant influence on laboratory values, electrocardiography and vital signs. Dizziness was the most common adverse event and showed a clear dose-dependence.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the safety and tolerability of neramexane treatment in patients with moderate to severe tinnitus. The primary efficacy variable showed a trend towards improvement of tinnitus suffering in the medium- and high-dose neramexane groups. This finding is in line with consistent beneficial effects observed in secondary assessment variables. These results allow appropriate dose selection for further studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00405886.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信