牙医用来决定是否使病人无牙的因素。第2部分。在东兰开夏郡使用邮寄问卷调查牙医。

Mark Pearce, Catherine Gedling, Gary Whittle, Janet Robinson, Hilary Whitehead
{"title":"牙医用来决定是否使病人无牙的因素。第2部分。在东兰开夏郡使用邮寄问卷调查牙医。","authors":"Mark Pearce,&nbsp;Catherine Gedling,&nbsp;Gary Whittle,&nbsp;Janet Robinson,&nbsp;Hilary Whitehead","doi":"10.1308/135576111794065757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the factors that dentists use to decide whether or not to make a patient edentulous.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A previous qualitative investigation identified factors that dentists would consider when making a patient edentulous. Using this information, a questionnaire was created and sent to all dentists practising in East Lancashire, asking them whether these factors would make them more or less likely to extract all remaining teeth for a patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>123 usable questionnaires were returned from 187 dentists, a response rate of 67%. Dentists felt that clinical factors such as poor periodontal health and active decay were more likely to make them extract all remaining teeth. They were also concerned about retention and were keen to retain strategic teeth. Apart from their acknowledgment of the need to comply with the patient's wish to keep his or her teeth, the dentists had a neutral opinion of other factors such as poor health or their personal attitude to treatment. On average, respondents were rendering just over three patients per year edentulous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this group of dentists, the key clinical factors that were considered when they decided whether or not to render a patient edentulous were periodontal disease, caries, and the attitude of the patient to tooth loss. Relatively few patients were rendered edentulous each year and if this pattern is common elsewhere in the United Kingdom, it may lead to a lack of skills within the dental workforce in managing patients' transition from dentate to edentulous.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"18 1","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576111794065757","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that dentists use to decide whether or not to render a patient edentulous. Part 2. An investigation using a postal questionnaire sent to dentists in East lancashire.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Pearce,&nbsp;Catherine Gedling,&nbsp;Gary Whittle,&nbsp;Janet Robinson,&nbsp;Hilary Whitehead\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/135576111794065757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the factors that dentists use to decide whether or not to make a patient edentulous.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A previous qualitative investigation identified factors that dentists would consider when making a patient edentulous. Using this information, a questionnaire was created and sent to all dentists practising in East Lancashire, asking them whether these factors would make them more or less likely to extract all remaining teeth for a patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>123 usable questionnaires were returned from 187 dentists, a response rate of 67%. Dentists felt that clinical factors such as poor periodontal health and active decay were more likely to make them extract all remaining teeth. They were also concerned about retention and were keen to retain strategic teeth. Apart from their acknowledgment of the need to comply with the patient's wish to keep his or her teeth, the dentists had a neutral opinion of other factors such as poor health or their personal attitude to treatment. On average, respondents were rendering just over three patients per year edentulous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this group of dentists, the key clinical factors that were considered when they decided whether or not to render a patient edentulous were periodontal disease, caries, and the attitude of the patient to tooth loss. Relatively few patients were rendered edentulous each year and if this pattern is common elsewhere in the United Kingdom, it may lead to a lack of skills within the dental workforce in managing patients' transition from dentate to edentulous.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"19-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576111794065757\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576111794065757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576111794065757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨牙科医生决定是否对患者进行无牙治疗的因素。方法:先前的定性调查确定了牙医在使患者无牙时会考虑的因素。利用这些信息,研究人员制作了一份调查问卷,并将其发送给东兰开夏郡的所有牙医,询问他们这些因素是否会使他们更有可能为病人拔掉所有剩余的牙齿。结果:187名牙医共回收可用问卷123份,回复率67%。牙医认为,牙周健康状况不佳和主动蛀牙等临床因素更有可能使他们拔掉所有剩余的牙齿。他们还关心保留,并热衷于保留战略牙齿。除了承认有需要遵从病人保留牙齿的意愿外,牙医对其他因素,例如健康欠佳或他们对治疗的个人态度,持中立态度。平均而言,受访者每年只提供超过三名无牙患者。结论:本组牙医在决定是否为患者提供无牙治疗时,主要考虑的临床因素是牙周病、龋齿和患者对牙齿脱落的态度。相对较少的患者呈现无牙,每年,如果这种模式是常见的在英国其他地方,它可能导致缺乏技能在牙科劳动力管理患者从有牙到无牙的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors that dentists use to decide whether or not to render a patient edentulous. Part 2. An investigation using a postal questionnaire sent to dentists in East lancashire.

Aims: To investigate the factors that dentists use to decide whether or not to make a patient edentulous.

Method: A previous qualitative investigation identified factors that dentists would consider when making a patient edentulous. Using this information, a questionnaire was created and sent to all dentists practising in East Lancashire, asking them whether these factors would make them more or less likely to extract all remaining teeth for a patient.

Results: 123 usable questionnaires were returned from 187 dentists, a response rate of 67%. Dentists felt that clinical factors such as poor periodontal health and active decay were more likely to make them extract all remaining teeth. They were also concerned about retention and were keen to retain strategic teeth. Apart from their acknowledgment of the need to comply with the patient's wish to keep his or her teeth, the dentists had a neutral opinion of other factors such as poor health or their personal attitude to treatment. On average, respondents were rendering just over three patients per year edentulous.

Conclusion: In this group of dentists, the key clinical factors that were considered when they decided whether or not to render a patient edentulous were periodontal disease, caries, and the attitude of the patient to tooth loss. Relatively few patients were rendered edentulous each year and if this pattern is common elsewhere in the United Kingdom, it may lead to a lack of skills within the dental workforce in managing patients' transition from dentate to edentulous.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信