心理治疗师会和精神药理学家交流吗?对执业临床医生的调查。

Jolie Avena, Thomas Kalman
{"title":"心理治疗师会和精神药理学家交流吗?对执业临床医生的调查。","authors":"Jolie Avena,&nbsp;Thomas Kalman","doi":"10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While more Americans are taking psychotropic medication than ever before, psychiatrists are providing less psychotherapy, leading to the prevalence of \"split-treatment\" whereby two professionals provide care. Communication between clinicians treating the same patient has traditionally been an accepted principle of optimal care, however there has been no published data documenting whether or not private practice therapists actually do communicate with the psychiatrists who prescribe for their patients. A pilot study was conducted in which a nine-item anonymous survey was distributed to non-medical psychotherapists in Manhattan. Information was gathered about professional degree and discipline, duration and size of practice, and frequency of communication with professionals who prescribe for their patients. Fifty-three psychotherapists averaging over 21 years in practice returned completed surveys. Respondents reported on 1,197 psychotherapy patients, with 434 (36%) concurrently taking medication. No communication had taken place between psychotherapist and psychopharmacologist on behalf of 22% of the psychotherapy patients taking medication. Only 7 of the 53 respondents reported having quarterly communication with the prescribing physician for all split-care patients. Despite methodological limitations, study findings document that communication between professionals is not taking place on behalf of many patients in split-treatment. These findings raise questions about the quality and safety of treatment delivered in this fashion, about the need for guidelines for the conduct of split treatment, and perhaps about the traditionally assumed need for communication itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":85742,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry","volume":"38 4","pages":"675-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do psychotherapists speak to psychopharmacologists? A survey of practicing clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Jolie Avena,&nbsp;Thomas Kalman\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While more Americans are taking psychotropic medication than ever before, psychiatrists are providing less psychotherapy, leading to the prevalence of \\\"split-treatment\\\" whereby two professionals provide care. Communication between clinicians treating the same patient has traditionally been an accepted principle of optimal care, however there has been no published data documenting whether or not private practice therapists actually do communicate with the psychiatrists who prescribe for their patients. A pilot study was conducted in which a nine-item anonymous survey was distributed to non-medical psychotherapists in Manhattan. Information was gathered about professional degree and discipline, duration and size of practice, and frequency of communication with professionals who prescribe for their patients. Fifty-three psychotherapists averaging over 21 years in practice returned completed surveys. Respondents reported on 1,197 psychotherapy patients, with 434 (36%) concurrently taking medication. No communication had taken place between psychotherapist and psychopharmacologist on behalf of 22% of the psychotherapy patients taking medication. Only 7 of the 53 respondents reported having quarterly communication with the prescribing physician for all split-care patients. Despite methodological limitations, study findings document that communication between professionals is not taking place on behalf of many patients in split-treatment. These findings raise questions about the quality and safety of treatment delivered in this fashion, about the need for guidelines for the conduct of split treatment, and perhaps about the traditionally assumed need for communication itself.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"675-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2010.38.4.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

与以往相比,越来越多的美国人服用精神药物,而精神科医生提供的心理治疗却越来越少,这导致了“分开治疗”的盛行,即由两名专业人士提供护理。治疗同一患者的临床医生之间的沟通传统上是公认的最佳护理原则,然而,没有公开的数据记录私人执业治疗师是否真的与为患者开处方的精神科医生进行沟通。进行了一项试点研究,其中向曼哈顿的非医疗心理治疗师分发了一份包含9个项目的匿名调查。收集了有关专业程度和学科、执业时间和规模以及与为其患者开处方的专业人员交流频率的信息。53位平均执业时间超过21年的心理治疗师返回了完成的调查。受访者报告了1197名心理治疗患者,其中434名(36%)同时服用药物。22%服用药物的心理治疗患者的心理治疗师和精神药理学家之间没有沟通。53名受访者中只有7人报告每季度与所有分开护理患者的处方医生进行沟通。尽管方法上存在局限性,但研究结果表明,专业人员之间的沟通并没有代表许多分开治疗的患者进行。这些发现提出了关于以这种方式提供治疗的质量和安全性的问题,关于进行分开治疗的指导方针的需要,以及可能关于传统上认为需要沟通本身的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do psychotherapists speak to psychopharmacologists? A survey of practicing clinicians.

While more Americans are taking psychotropic medication than ever before, psychiatrists are providing less psychotherapy, leading to the prevalence of "split-treatment" whereby two professionals provide care. Communication between clinicians treating the same patient has traditionally been an accepted principle of optimal care, however there has been no published data documenting whether or not private practice therapists actually do communicate with the psychiatrists who prescribe for their patients. A pilot study was conducted in which a nine-item anonymous survey was distributed to non-medical psychotherapists in Manhattan. Information was gathered about professional degree and discipline, duration and size of practice, and frequency of communication with professionals who prescribe for their patients. Fifty-three psychotherapists averaging over 21 years in practice returned completed surveys. Respondents reported on 1,197 psychotherapy patients, with 434 (36%) concurrently taking medication. No communication had taken place between psychotherapist and psychopharmacologist on behalf of 22% of the psychotherapy patients taking medication. Only 7 of the 53 respondents reported having quarterly communication with the prescribing physician for all split-care patients. Despite methodological limitations, study findings document that communication between professionals is not taking place on behalf of many patients in split-treatment. These findings raise questions about the quality and safety of treatment delivered in this fashion, about the need for guidelines for the conduct of split treatment, and perhaps about the traditionally assumed need for communication itself.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信