Jin-young Yang, Eun-Jee Oh, Yonggoo Kim, Yeon-Joon Park
{"title":"【抗dsdna抗体检测的评价:水仙免疫荧光法、免疫印迹法、酶联免疫吸附法、化学发光法】。","authors":"Jin-young Yang, Eun-Jee Oh, Yonggoo Kim, Yeon-Joon Park","doi":"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) test is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although several methods are available, none of them is completely satisfactory and differences among them have been reported. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 142 sera (SLE [N=74], other systemic rheumatic diseases [N=50], other diseases [N=18]) were tested by 6 different assay kits using different antigenic sources of DNA: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), salmon testes (immunoblot, IB), human (ELISA I), salmon testes with nucleosome linker (ELISA II), plasmid (ELISA III), and synthetic oligonucleotides (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With manufacturers' cut-off values, 6 test kits showed sensitivities of 55.4-91.9%. ELISA I had a greater sensitivity than the other five assays (P<0.001). The specificities of ELISA II, ELISA III, CLIA, and CLIFT were higher than those of ELISA I and IB (P<0.05). In ROC curve analysis, 3 ELISA kits and CLIA showed AUC values of 0.845-0.893, and revealed no significant differences among them (P>0.05). With cut-off values set at 95% of specificity, ELISA II had a higher sensitivity than ELISA III (63.5% vs. 41.9%, P<0.05). IB had poor concordance rates with other assays (42.0-65.0%). Pearson correlation coefficients among 4 quantitative assays were 0.667-0.798.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six different assays showed various performances depending on the methods and cut-off values used. Except IB, the other five assays can be used for the detection of anti-dsDNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":17890,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"30 6","pages":"675-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Anti-dsDNA antibody tests: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test, immunoblot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, chemiluminescence immunoassay].\",\"authors\":\"Jin-young Yang, Eun-Jee Oh, Yonggoo Kim, Yeon-Joon Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) test is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although several methods are available, none of them is completely satisfactory and differences among them have been reported. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 142 sera (SLE [N=74], other systemic rheumatic diseases [N=50], other diseases [N=18]) were tested by 6 different assay kits using different antigenic sources of DNA: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), salmon testes (immunoblot, IB), human (ELISA I), salmon testes with nucleosome linker (ELISA II), plasmid (ELISA III), and synthetic oligonucleotides (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With manufacturers' cut-off values, 6 test kits showed sensitivities of 55.4-91.9%. ELISA I had a greater sensitivity than the other five assays (P<0.001). The specificities of ELISA II, ELISA III, CLIA, and CLIFT were higher than those of ELISA I and IB (P<0.05). In ROC curve analysis, 3 ELISA kits and CLIA showed AUC values of 0.845-0.893, and revealed no significant differences among them (P>0.05). With cut-off values set at 95% of specificity, ELISA II had a higher sensitivity than ELISA III (63.5% vs. 41.9%, P<0.05). IB had poor concordance rates with other assays (42.0-65.0%). Pearson correlation coefficients among 4 quantitative assays were 0.667-0.798.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six different assays showed various performances depending on the methods and cut-off values used. Except IB, the other five assays can be used for the detection of anti-dsDNA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"675-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
背景:抗双链DNA抗体(anti-dsDNA)检测对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断和监测具有重要意义。虽然有几种方法可用,但没有一种方法是完全令人满意的,并且它们之间存在差异。我们评估了6种商用抗dsdna检测试剂盒的诊断性能。方法:采用6种不同的检测试剂盒,对142份血清(SLE [N=74],其他系统性风湿病[N=50],其他疾病[N=18])进行检测,采用不同的抗原DNA来源:水蛭免疫荧光试验(CLIFT),鲑鱼睾丸(免疫印迹,IB),人(ELISA I),带核小体连接体的鲑鱼睾丸(ELISA II),质粒(ELISA III)和合成寡核苷酸(化学发光免疫测定,CLIA)。结果:6种检测试剂盒的灵敏度为55.4 ~ 91.9%,采用厂家临界值。ELISA I的敏感性高于其他5种检测方法(P0.05)。在95%的特异性临界值下,ELISA II的敏感性高于ELISA III (63.5% vs. 41.9%)。结论:6种不同的检测方法和临界值不同,表现出不同的性能。除IB外,其他5种方法均可用于检测抗dsdna。
Background: Anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA) test is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although several methods are available, none of them is completely satisfactory and differences among them have been reported. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 6 commercial kits for anti-dsDNA detection.
Methods: A total of 142 sera (SLE [N=74], other systemic rheumatic diseases [N=50], other diseases [N=18]) were tested by 6 different assay kits using different antigenic sources of DNA: Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), salmon testes (immunoblot, IB), human (ELISA I), salmon testes with nucleosome linker (ELISA II), plasmid (ELISA III), and synthetic oligonucleotides (chemiluminescence immunoassay, CLIA).
Results: With manufacturers' cut-off values, 6 test kits showed sensitivities of 55.4-91.9%. ELISA I had a greater sensitivity than the other five assays (P<0.001). The specificities of ELISA II, ELISA III, CLIA, and CLIFT were higher than those of ELISA I and IB (P<0.05). In ROC curve analysis, 3 ELISA kits and CLIA showed AUC values of 0.845-0.893, and revealed no significant differences among them (P>0.05). With cut-off values set at 95% of specificity, ELISA II had a higher sensitivity than ELISA III (63.5% vs. 41.9%, P<0.05). IB had poor concordance rates with other assays (42.0-65.0%). Pearson correlation coefficients among 4 quantitative assays were 0.667-0.798.
Conclusions: Six different assays showed various performances depending on the methods and cut-off values used. Except IB, the other five assays can be used for the detection of anti-dsDNA.