[基于2008年世界卫生组织分类的混合表型急性白血病研究]。

Joonhong Park, Hyojin Chae, Myungshin Kim, Jihyang Lim, Yonggoo Kim, Jaewook Lee, Nak Gyun Chung, Bin Cho, Hack Ki Kim, Seok Lee, Kyungja Han
{"title":"[基于2008年世界卫生组织分类的混合表型急性白血病研究]。","authors":"Joonhong Park,&nbsp;Hyojin Chae,&nbsp;Myungshin Kim,&nbsp;Jihyang Lim,&nbsp;Yonggoo Kim,&nbsp;Jaewook Lee,&nbsp;Nak Gyun Chung,&nbsp;Bin Cho,&nbsp;Hack Ki Kim,&nbsp;Seok Lee,&nbsp;Kyungja Han","doi":"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the clinical significance of revised 2008 WHO classification needed to diagnose mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 22 MPAL patients, previously diagnosed by applying the scoring system of the European Group for Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) were reclassified based on the 2008 WHO classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2008 WHO classification, the number of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) required for assigning more than one lineage was markedly decreased, from 26 to 11, compared with that of EGIL. Seventeen of the 22 MPAL patients were reclassified as MPAL with following details: 6 MPAL with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABL1, 1 MPAL with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged, 7 MPAL, B/Myeloid, not otherwise specified (NOS) and 3 MPAL, T/Myeloid, NOS. Five patients were excluded from MPAL in the revised classification: 4 cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (cMPO)-negative and 1 CD19-negative. The failure of complete remission achievement and occurrence of relapse were associated with poor prognosis (P=0.0002 and P=0.009, respectively). But the presence of Philadelphia chromosome was not significantly related with patient outcome (P=0.082). One patient with cCD79a, CD20, CD38, cMPO and CD15, whose diagnosis was reclassified from MPAL to AML has survived during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because of decreased number of mAbs needed, it is possible that acute leukemia panel is designed to include all mAbs required to diagnose MPAL according to 2008 WHO classification. When diagnosing MPAL, it is critical to figure out positivity in either cMPO or CD19, and AML expressing more than 2 lymphoid antigens are considered as MPAL.</p>","PeriodicalId":17890,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"30 6","pages":"525-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A study of mixed phenotype acute leukemia based on the 2008 World Health Organization classification].\",\"authors\":\"Joonhong Park,&nbsp;Hyojin Chae,&nbsp;Myungshin Kim,&nbsp;Jihyang Lim,&nbsp;Yonggoo Kim,&nbsp;Jaewook Lee,&nbsp;Nak Gyun Chung,&nbsp;Bin Cho,&nbsp;Hack Ki Kim,&nbsp;Seok Lee,&nbsp;Kyungja Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the clinical significance of revised 2008 WHO classification needed to diagnose mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 22 MPAL patients, previously diagnosed by applying the scoring system of the European Group for Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) were reclassified based on the 2008 WHO classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2008 WHO classification, the number of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) required for assigning more than one lineage was markedly decreased, from 26 to 11, compared with that of EGIL. Seventeen of the 22 MPAL patients were reclassified as MPAL with following details: 6 MPAL with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABL1, 1 MPAL with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged, 7 MPAL, B/Myeloid, not otherwise specified (NOS) and 3 MPAL, T/Myeloid, NOS. Five patients were excluded from MPAL in the revised classification: 4 cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (cMPO)-negative and 1 CD19-negative. The failure of complete remission achievement and occurrence of relapse were associated with poor prognosis (P=0.0002 and P=0.009, respectively). But the presence of Philadelphia chromosome was not significantly related with patient outcome (P=0.082). One patient with cCD79a, CD20, CD38, cMPO and CD15, whose diagnosis was reclassified from MPAL to AML has survived during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because of decreased number of mAbs needed, it is possible that acute leukemia panel is designed to include all mAbs required to diagnose MPAL according to 2008 WHO classification. When diagnosing MPAL, it is critical to figure out positivity in either cMPO or CD19, and AML expressing more than 2 lymphoid antigens are considered as MPAL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"525-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:我们评估了诊断混合表型急性白血病(MPAL)所需的2008年修订WHO分类的临床意义。方法:对22例既往应用欧洲急性白血病免疫分级(EGIL)评分系统诊断的MPAL患者,在2008年WHO分级基础上进行重新分级。结果:在2008年WHO分类中,与EGIL相比,分配多个谱系所需的单克隆抗体(mab)数量明显减少,从26个减少到11个。22例MPAL患者中有17例被重新分类为MPAL,具体情况如下:6例MPAL患者为t(9;22)(q34;q11.2);BCR-ABL1, 1 MPAL伴t(v;11q23);MLL重排,7例MPAL, B/髓系,非特异性(NOS), 3例MPAL, T/髓系,NOS。5例患者被排除在MPAL的修订分类中:4例胞浆髓过氧化物酶(cMPO)阴性,1例cd19阴性。未达到完全缓解和复发与预后不良相关(P=0.0002和P=0.009)。但费城染色体的存在与患者预后无显著相关性(P=0.082)。1例患有cCD79a、CD20、CD38、cMPO和CD15的患者在研究期间存活,其诊断从MPAL重新分类为AML。结论:由于所需的单克隆抗体数量减少,根据2008年世卫组织的分类,急性白血病小组可能被设计为包括诊断MPAL所需的所有单克隆抗体。诊断MPAL时,关键是要明确cMPO或CD19是否阳性,表达2种以上淋巴样抗原的AML被认为是MPAL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A study of mixed phenotype acute leukemia based on the 2008 World Health Organization classification].

Background: We evaluated the clinical significance of revised 2008 WHO classification needed to diagnose mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL).

Methods: A total of 22 MPAL patients, previously diagnosed by applying the scoring system of the European Group for Immunological Classification of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) were reclassified based on the 2008 WHO classification.

Results: In 2008 WHO classification, the number of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) required for assigning more than one lineage was markedly decreased, from 26 to 11, compared with that of EGIL. Seventeen of the 22 MPAL patients were reclassified as MPAL with following details: 6 MPAL with t(9;22)(q34;q11.2); BCR-ABL1, 1 MPAL with t(v;11q23); MLL rearranged, 7 MPAL, B/Myeloid, not otherwise specified (NOS) and 3 MPAL, T/Myeloid, NOS. Five patients were excluded from MPAL in the revised classification: 4 cytoplasmic myeloperoxidase (cMPO)-negative and 1 CD19-negative. The failure of complete remission achievement and occurrence of relapse were associated with poor prognosis (P=0.0002 and P=0.009, respectively). But the presence of Philadelphia chromosome was not significantly related with patient outcome (P=0.082). One patient with cCD79a, CD20, CD38, cMPO and CD15, whose diagnosis was reclassified from MPAL to AML has survived during the study period.

Conclusions: Because of decreased number of mAbs needed, it is possible that acute leukemia panel is designed to include all mAbs required to diagnose MPAL according to 2008 WHO classification. When diagnosing MPAL, it is critical to figure out positivity in either cMPO or CD19, and AML expressing more than 2 lymphoid antigens are considered as MPAL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 医学-医学实验技术
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信