[评价选择性显色琼脂培养基(chromID VRE)和多重PCR法检测万古霉素耐药肠球菌的有效性]。

Do-Hoon Kim, Jae-Hee Lee, Jung-Sook Ha, Nam-Hee Ryoo, Dong-Seok Jeon, Jae-Ryong Kim
{"title":"[评价选择性显色琼脂培养基(chromID VRE)和多重PCR法检测万古霉素耐药肠球菌的有效性]。","authors":"Do-Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Hee Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Sook Ha,&nbsp;Nam-Hee Ryoo,&nbsp;Dong-Seok Jeon,&nbsp;Jae-Ryong Kim","doi":"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and early detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is critical for controlling nosocomial infection. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of a selective chromogenic agar medium and of multiplex PCR for detection of VRE, and both these techniques were compared with the conventional culture method for VRE detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed the following 3 methods for detecting VRE infection in stool specimens: the routine culture method, culturing in selective chromogenic agar medium (chromID VRE, bioMérieux, France), and multiplex PCR using the Seeplex® VRE ACE Detection kit (Seegene Inc., Korea) with additional PCR for vanC genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We isolated 109 VRE strains from 100 stool specimens by the routine culture method. In chromID VRE, all the isolates showed purple colonies, including Enterococcus gallinarum and E. raffinosus, which were later identified using the Vitek card. All VRE isolates were identified by the multiplex PCR method; 100 were vanA-positive E. faecium, 8 were vanA- and vanC-1-positive E. gallinarum, and 1 was vanA-positive E. raffinosus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For VRE surveillance, culturing the isolates in chromID VRE after broth enrichment appears to be an accurate, rapid, and easy method for routine screening test. Multiplex PCR is relatively expensive and needs skilled techniques for detecting VRE, but it can be an auxiliary tool for rapid detection of genotype during a VRE outbreak.</p>","PeriodicalId":17890,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"30 6","pages":"631-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of the usefulness of selective chromogenic agar medium (chromID VRE) and multiplex PCR method for the detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci].\",\"authors\":\"Do-Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Hee Lee,&nbsp;Jung-Sook Ha,&nbsp;Nam-Hee Ryoo,&nbsp;Dong-Seok Jeon,&nbsp;Jae-Ryong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate and early detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is critical for controlling nosocomial infection. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of a selective chromogenic agar medium and of multiplex PCR for detection of VRE, and both these techniques were compared with the conventional culture method for VRE detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed the following 3 methods for detecting VRE infection in stool specimens: the routine culture method, culturing in selective chromogenic agar medium (chromID VRE, bioMérieux, France), and multiplex PCR using the Seeplex® VRE ACE Detection kit (Seegene Inc., Korea) with additional PCR for vanC genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We isolated 109 VRE strains from 100 stool specimens by the routine culture method. In chromID VRE, all the isolates showed purple colonies, including Enterococcus gallinarum and E. raffinosus, which were later identified using the Vitek card. All VRE isolates were identified by the multiplex PCR method; 100 were vanA-positive E. faecium, 8 were vanA- and vanC-1-positive E. gallinarum, and 1 was vanA-positive E. raffinosus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For VRE surveillance, culturing the isolates in chromID VRE after broth enrichment appears to be an accurate, rapid, and easy method for routine screening test. Multiplex PCR is relatively expensive and needs skilled techniques for detecting VRE, but it can be an auxiliary tool for rapid detection of genotype during a VRE outbreak.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"631-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2010.30.6.631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:准确、早期检测万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)对控制医院感染至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了选择性显色琼脂培养基和多重PCR检测VRE的有效性,并将这两种技术与常规培养检测VRE的方法进行了比较。方法:采用以下3种方法检测粪便标本中VRE感染:常规培养法、选择性显色琼脂培养基(chromID VRE, biomrieux,法国)培养和使用Seeplex®VRE ACE检测试剂盒(Seegene Inc.,韩国)进行多重PCR,并对vanC基因进行PCR检测。结果:采用常规培养法从100份粪便标本中分离出109株VRE菌株。在chromID VRE中,所有分离物均显示紫色菌落,包括鸡肠球菌和E. raffinosus,随后使用Vitek卡鉴定。所有VRE分离株均采用多重PCR法进行鉴定;vanA阳性的屎肠杆菌100只,vanA和vanc -1阳性的鸡肠杆菌8只,vanA阳性的鼠肠杆菌1只。结论:在常规筛选试验中,用培养液富集后的chromID VRE培养分离株是一种准确、快速、简便的方法。多重PCR相对昂贵,需要熟练的检测VRE技术,但它可以作为VRE暴发期间快速检测基因型的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of the usefulness of selective chromogenic agar medium (chromID VRE) and multiplex PCR method for the detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci].

Background: Accurate and early detection of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is critical for controlling nosocomial infection. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of a selective chromogenic agar medium and of multiplex PCR for detection of VRE, and both these techniques were compared with the conventional culture method for VRE detection.

Methods: We performed the following 3 methods for detecting VRE infection in stool specimens: the routine culture method, culturing in selective chromogenic agar medium (chromID VRE, bioMérieux, France), and multiplex PCR using the Seeplex® VRE ACE Detection kit (Seegene Inc., Korea) with additional PCR for vanC genes.

Results: We isolated 109 VRE strains from 100 stool specimens by the routine culture method. In chromID VRE, all the isolates showed purple colonies, including Enterococcus gallinarum and E. raffinosus, which were later identified using the Vitek card. All VRE isolates were identified by the multiplex PCR method; 100 were vanA-positive E. faecium, 8 were vanA- and vanC-1-positive E. gallinarum, and 1 was vanA-positive E. raffinosus.

Conclusions: For VRE surveillance, culturing the isolates in chromID VRE after broth enrichment appears to be an accurate, rapid, and easy method for routine screening test. Multiplex PCR is relatively expensive and needs skilled techniques for detecting VRE, but it can be an auxiliary tool for rapid detection of genotype during a VRE outbreak.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 医学-医学实验技术
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信