扩展默顿规范：科学家对研究规范的认同。

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2010-05-01 DOI:10.1353/jhe.0.0095

Melissa S Anderson, Emily A Ronning, Raymond Devries, Brian C Martinson

{"title":"扩展默顿规范：科学家对研究规范的认同。","authors":"Melissa S Anderson, Emily A Ronning, Raymond Devries, Brian C Martinson","doi":"10.1353/jhe.0.0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.","PeriodicalId":54209,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education","volume":"81 3","pages":"366-393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995462/pdf/nihms250315.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa S Anderson, Emily A Ronning, Raymond Devries, Brian C Martinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhe.0.0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"81 3\",\"pages\":\"366-393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2995462/pdf/nihms250315.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项分析以焦点小组和一项全国性调查为基础，评估了科学家对默顿科学准则和相关反准则的认同情况。它还支持将这些准则扩展到作为决策准则的管理（相对于行政）和作为评价准则的质量（相对于数量）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research.

This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as a evaluative norm.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

5.70

自引率

6.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1930, The Journal of Higher Education publishes original research reporting on the academic study of higher education as a broad enterprise. We publish the highest quality empirical, theoretically grounded work addressing the main functions of higher education and the dynamic role of the university in society. We seek to publish scholarship from a wide variety of theoretical perspectives and disciplinary orientations. Articles appearing in the Journal employ an array of methodological approaches, and we welcome work from scholars across a range of career stages. Comparative and international scholarship should make clear connections to the U.S. context. Manuscripts not appropriate for submission to the Journal include purely theoretical papers, methodological treatises, unsolicited essays and reviews, and non-academic, institutional, and program evaluations or reports.