佛蒙特州糖尿病信息系统对住院和急诊科使用的影响:一项随机试验的结果

Shamima Khan MBA, PhD , Charles D. MacLean MDCM , Benjamin Littenberg MD
{"title":"佛蒙特州糖尿病信息系统对住院和急诊科使用的影响:一项随机试验的结果","authors":"Shamima Khan MBA, PhD ,&nbsp;Charles D. MacLean MDCM ,&nbsp;Benjamin Littenberg MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) on hospital and emergency department use.</p></div><div><h3>Data Source</h3><p>Statewide discharge database.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial<span> of a decision support system for 7412 adults with diabetes and their 64 primary care providers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Data Collection/Data Extraction</h3><p>Charges and dates for hospital admissions and emergency department care in Vermont during an average of 32 months of observation. Data from New York hospitals were not available.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients randomized to VDIS were admitted to the hospital less often than control subjects (0.17 admissions vs 0.20; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01) and generated lower hospital charges ($3113 vs $3480; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.019). VDIS patients also had lower emergency department utilization (0.27 visits vs 0.36; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001) and charges ($304 vs $414; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001). The intervention was particularly effective in men and in older subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite data limitations that tended to reduce the apparent effect of the system, this randomized, controlled trial showed that VDIS reduces hospitalization and emergency department utilization and expenses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages e61-e66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.002","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System on Inpatient and Emergency Department Use: Results from a Randomized Trial\",\"authors\":\"Shamima Khan MBA, PhD ,&nbsp;Charles D. MacLean MDCM ,&nbsp;Benjamin Littenberg MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) on hospital and emergency department use.</p></div><div><h3>Data Source</h3><p>Statewide discharge database.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled trial<span> of a decision support system for 7412 adults with diabetes and their 64 primary care providers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Data Collection/Data Extraction</h3><p>Charges and dates for hospital admissions and emergency department care in Vermont during an average of 32 months of observation. Data from New York hospitals were not available.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients randomized to VDIS were admitted to the hospital less often than control subjects (0.17 admissions vs 0.20; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01) and generated lower hospital charges ($3113 vs $3480; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.019). VDIS patients also had lower emergency department utilization (0.27 visits vs 0.36; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001) and charges ($304 vs $414; <em>P</em> &lt;.0001). The intervention was particularly effective in men and in older subjects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite data limitations that tended to reduce the apparent effect of the system, this randomized, controlled trial showed that VDIS reduces hospitalization and emergency department utilization and expenses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e61-e66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.002\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health outcomes research in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131910000066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131910000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

目的探讨佛蒙特州糖尿病信息系统(VDIS)在医院和急诊科的应用效果。数据源全州排放数据库。研究设计:对7412名成年糖尿病患者及其64名初级保健提供者进行决策支持系统的随机对照试验。数据收集/数据提取佛蒙特州平均32个月观察期间住院和急诊护理的费用和日期。纽约医院的数据无法获得。结果随机分配到VDIS组的患者入院次数低于对照组(0.17次vs 0.20次;P = 0.01),并产生较低的医院费用(3113美元对3480美元;p = .019)。VDIS患者急诊科使用率也较低(0.27次vs 0.36次;P < 0.0001)和收费(304美元vs 414美元;P & lt;。)。这种干预对男性和老年受试者尤其有效。结论:尽管数据限制可能会降低该系统的明显效果,但这项随机对照试验表明,VDIS降低了住院和急诊科的使用率和费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System on Inpatient and Emergency Department Use: Results from a Randomized Trial

Objective

To describe the effect of the Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) on hospital and emergency department use.

Data Source

Statewide discharge database.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial of a decision support system for 7412 adults with diabetes and their 64 primary care providers.

Data Collection/Data Extraction

Charges and dates for hospital admissions and emergency department care in Vermont during an average of 32 months of observation. Data from New York hospitals were not available.

Results

Patients randomized to VDIS were admitted to the hospital less often than control subjects (0.17 admissions vs 0.20; P = .01) and generated lower hospital charges ($3113 vs $3480; P = .019). VDIS patients also had lower emergency department utilization (0.27 visits vs 0.36; P <.0001) and charges ($304 vs $414; P <.0001). The intervention was particularly effective in men and in older subjects.

Conclusions

Despite data limitations that tended to reduce the apparent effect of the system, this randomized, controlled trial showed that VDIS reduces hospitalization and emergency department utilization and expenses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信