鉴定人类和类人猿植酸代谢差异可能影响基因表达谱和生理功能。

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Paul A Watkins, Ann B Moser, Cicely B Toomer, Steven J Steinberg, Hugo W Moser, Mazen W Karaman, Krishna Ramaswamy, Kimberly D Siegmund, D Rick Lee, John J Ely, Oliver A Ryder, Joseph G Hacia
{"title":"鉴定人类和类人猿植酸代谢差异可能影响基因表达谱和生理功能。","authors":"Paul A Watkins,&nbsp;Ann B Moser,&nbsp;Cicely B Toomer,&nbsp;Steven J Steinberg,&nbsp;Hugo W Moser,&nbsp;Mazen W Karaman,&nbsp;Krishna Ramaswamy,&nbsp;Kimberly D Siegmund,&nbsp;D Rick Lee,&nbsp;John J Ely,&nbsp;Oliver A Ryder,&nbsp;Joseph G Hacia","doi":"10.1186/1472-6793-10-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been proposed that anatomical differences in human and great ape guts arose in response to species-specific diets and energy demands. To investigate functional genomic consequences of these differences, we compared their physiological levels of phytanic acid, a branched chain fatty acid that can be derived from the microbial degradation of chlorophyll in ruminant guts. Humans who accumulate large stores of phytanic acid commonly develop cerebellar ataxia, peripheral polyneuropathy, and retinitis pigmentosa in addition to other medical conditions. Furthermore, phytanic acid is an activator of the PPAR-alpha transcription factor that influences the expression of genes relevant to lipid metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite their trace dietary phytanic acid intake, all great ape species had elevated red blood cell (RBC) phytanic acid levels relative to humans on diverse diets. Unlike humans, chimpanzees showed sexual dimorphism in RBC phytanic acid levels, which were higher in males relative to females. Cultured skin fibroblasts from all species had a robust capacity to degrade phytanic acid. We provide indirect evidence that great apes, in contrast to humans, derive significant amounts of phytanic acid from the hindgut fermentation of plant materials. This would represent a novel reduction of metabolic activity in humans relative to the great apes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified differences in the physiological levels of phytanic acid in humans and great apes and propose this is causally related to their gut anatomies and microbiomes. Phytanic acid levels could contribute to cross-species and sex-specific differences in human and great ape transcriptomes, especially those related to lipid metabolism. Based on the medical conditions caused by phytanic acid accumulation, we suggest that differences in phytanic acid metabolism could influence the functions of human and great ape nervous, cardiovascular, and skeletal systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":35905,"journal":{"name":"BMC Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6793-10-19","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of differences in human and great ape phytanic acid metabolism that could influence gene expression profiles and physiological functions.\",\"authors\":\"Paul A Watkins,&nbsp;Ann B Moser,&nbsp;Cicely B Toomer,&nbsp;Steven J Steinberg,&nbsp;Hugo W Moser,&nbsp;Mazen W Karaman,&nbsp;Krishna Ramaswamy,&nbsp;Kimberly D Siegmund,&nbsp;D Rick Lee,&nbsp;John J Ely,&nbsp;Oliver A Ryder,&nbsp;Joseph G Hacia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1472-6793-10-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been proposed that anatomical differences in human and great ape guts arose in response to species-specific diets and energy demands. To investigate functional genomic consequences of these differences, we compared their physiological levels of phytanic acid, a branched chain fatty acid that can be derived from the microbial degradation of chlorophyll in ruminant guts. Humans who accumulate large stores of phytanic acid commonly develop cerebellar ataxia, peripheral polyneuropathy, and retinitis pigmentosa in addition to other medical conditions. Furthermore, phytanic acid is an activator of the PPAR-alpha transcription factor that influences the expression of genes relevant to lipid metabolism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite their trace dietary phytanic acid intake, all great ape species had elevated red blood cell (RBC) phytanic acid levels relative to humans on diverse diets. Unlike humans, chimpanzees showed sexual dimorphism in RBC phytanic acid levels, which were higher in males relative to females. Cultured skin fibroblasts from all species had a robust capacity to degrade phytanic acid. We provide indirect evidence that great apes, in contrast to humans, derive significant amounts of phytanic acid from the hindgut fermentation of plant materials. This would represent a novel reduction of metabolic activity in humans relative to the great apes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified differences in the physiological levels of phytanic acid in humans and great apes and propose this is causally related to their gut anatomies and microbiomes. Phytanic acid levels could contribute to cross-species and sex-specific differences in human and great ape transcriptomes, especially those related to lipid metabolism. Based on the medical conditions caused by phytanic acid accumulation, we suggest that differences in phytanic acid metabolism could influence the functions of human and great ape nervous, cardiovascular, and skeletal systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6793-10-19\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-10-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6793-10-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

背景:有人提出,人类和类人猿肠道的解剖差异是对物种特定饮食和能量需求的反应。为了研究这些差异的功能基因组后果,我们比较了它们的植酸生理水平,植酸是一种支链脂肪酸,可以从反刍动物肠道中叶绿素的微生物降解中获得。积累大量植酸的人除了其他疾病外,通常还会发生小脑性共济失调、周围多发性神经病变和视网膜色素变性。此外,植酸是ppar - α转录因子的激活剂,影响脂质代谢相关基因的表达。结果:尽管类人猿在饮食中摄入了微量的植酸,但所有类人猿的红细胞(RBC)植酸水平相对于不同饮食的人类都有所升高。与人类不同,黑猩猩在红细胞植酸水平上表现出性别二态性,雄性的植酸水平高于雌性。培养的所有物种的皮肤成纤维细胞都具有强大的降解植酸的能力。我们提供的间接证据表明,与人类不同,类人猿从植物材料的后肠发酵中获得了大量的植酸。这将代表人类相对于类人猿代谢活动的一种新的减少。结论:我们确定了人类和类人猿植酸生理水平的差异,并提出这与他们的肠道解剖结构和微生物组有因果关系。植酸水平可能导致人类和类人猿转录组的跨物种和性别差异,特别是与脂质代谢相关的转录组差异。基于植酸积累引起的医学状况,我们认为植酸代谢的差异可能影响人类和类人猿神经系统、心血管系统和骨骼系统的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identification of differences in human and great ape phytanic acid metabolism that could influence gene expression profiles and physiological functions.

Identification of differences in human and great ape phytanic acid metabolism that could influence gene expression profiles and physiological functions.

Identification of differences in human and great ape phytanic acid metabolism that could influence gene expression profiles and physiological functions.

Identification of differences in human and great ape phytanic acid metabolism that could influence gene expression profiles and physiological functions.

Background: It has been proposed that anatomical differences in human and great ape guts arose in response to species-specific diets and energy demands. To investigate functional genomic consequences of these differences, we compared their physiological levels of phytanic acid, a branched chain fatty acid that can be derived from the microbial degradation of chlorophyll in ruminant guts. Humans who accumulate large stores of phytanic acid commonly develop cerebellar ataxia, peripheral polyneuropathy, and retinitis pigmentosa in addition to other medical conditions. Furthermore, phytanic acid is an activator of the PPAR-alpha transcription factor that influences the expression of genes relevant to lipid metabolism.

Results: Despite their trace dietary phytanic acid intake, all great ape species had elevated red blood cell (RBC) phytanic acid levels relative to humans on diverse diets. Unlike humans, chimpanzees showed sexual dimorphism in RBC phytanic acid levels, which were higher in males relative to females. Cultured skin fibroblasts from all species had a robust capacity to degrade phytanic acid. We provide indirect evidence that great apes, in contrast to humans, derive significant amounts of phytanic acid from the hindgut fermentation of plant materials. This would represent a novel reduction of metabolic activity in humans relative to the great apes.

Conclusion: We identified differences in the physiological levels of phytanic acid in humans and great apes and propose this is causally related to their gut anatomies and microbiomes. Phytanic acid levels could contribute to cross-species and sex-specific differences in human and great ape transcriptomes, especially those related to lipid metabolism. Based on the medical conditions caused by phytanic acid accumulation, we suggest that differences in phytanic acid metabolism could influence the functions of human and great ape nervous, cardiovascular, and skeletal systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Physiology
BMC Physiology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Physiology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of physiological processes. BMC Physiology (ISSN 1472-6793) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus, Zoological Record and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信