由于2010年的《患者保护和平价医疗法案》,初级保健医生的收入有所增加——继续调整医生的报酬。

Q2 Medicine
Rural policy brief Pub Date : 2010-08-01
A Clinton MacKinney
{"title":"由于2010年的《患者保护和平价医疗法案》,初级保健医生的收入有所增加——继续调整医生的报酬。","authors":"A Clinton MacKinney","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) authorizes several changes to the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) system that are designed to increase primary care physician personal income and reduce geographic variation in primary care payment. In this brief, the ACA-authorized primary care payment adjustments are modeled in a prototypical rural primary care practice to assess both the potential impact on physician personal income and the likelihood that the changes will achieve the desired policy outcome. Key Findings. (1) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) increases physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice an average of $3,537 (1.9%) in 2010 compared to baseline income as if the ACA were not enacted. In 2011, physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice increases by an average of $12,013 (9.3%) compared to baseline. (2) Due to Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) changes legislated by the ACA, physician personal income increases are greater in entire-state Medicare payment localities than in states with multiple Medicare payment localities. (3) The requirement that at least 60% of a practice's furnished services must be specific \"primary care services\" to receive the ACA primary care bonus may eliminate eligibility for rural primary care practices that tend to offer more procedures (thus proportionally fewer primary care services) than urban/suburban practices. (4) The ACA primary care payment increases may be too small to have a significant impact on primary care and rural physician shortages. Targeted and significant primary care payment bonuses may be a more effective policy to reduce specific physician shortages.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2010 2","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increases in primary care physician income due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 - continued tweaking of physician payment.\",\"authors\":\"A Clinton MacKinney\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) authorizes several changes to the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) system that are designed to increase primary care physician personal income and reduce geographic variation in primary care payment. In this brief, the ACA-authorized primary care payment adjustments are modeled in a prototypical rural primary care practice to assess both the potential impact on physician personal income and the likelihood that the changes will achieve the desired policy outcome. Key Findings. (1) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) increases physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice an average of $3,537 (1.9%) in 2010 compared to baseline income as if the ACA were not enacted. In 2011, physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice increases by an average of $12,013 (9.3%) compared to baseline. (2) Due to Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) changes legislated by the ACA, physician personal income increases are greater in entire-state Medicare payment localities than in states with multiple Medicare payment localities. (3) The requirement that at least 60% of a practice's furnished services must be specific \\\"primary care services\\\" to receive the ACA primary care bonus may eliminate eligibility for rural primary care practices that tend to offer more procedures (thus proportionally fewer primary care services) than urban/suburban practices. (4) The ACA primary care payment increases may be too small to have a significant impact on primary care and rural physician shortages. Targeted and significant primary care payment bonuses may be a more effective policy to reduce specific physician shortages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rural policy brief\",\"volume\":\" 2010 2\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rural policy brief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural policy brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)授权对基于资源的相对价值量表(RBRVS)系统进行几项修改,旨在增加初级保健医生的个人收入,减少初级保健支付的地域差异。在本文中,aca授权的初级保健支付调整在一个典型的农村初级保健实践中进行建模,以评估对医生个人收入的潜在影响以及这些变化实现预期政策结果的可能性。关键的发现。(1) 2010年,《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, ACA)在一个典型的初级保健实践中,使医生的个人收入平均比未实施ACA的基线收入增加了3537美元(1.9%)。2011年,在一个典型的初级保健实践中,医生的个人收入比基线平均增加了12,013美元(9.3%)。(2)由于ACA立法改变了地理执业成本指数(GPCI),整个州的医疗保险支付地区的医生个人收入增幅大于多个医疗保险支付地区的医生个人收入增幅。(3)要求至少60%的诊所提供的服务必须是特定的“初级保健服务”才能获得ACA的初级保健奖金,这可能会取消农村初级保健诊所的资格,因为农村初级保健诊所往往比城市/郊区的诊所提供更多的程序(因此按比例减少初级保健服务)。(4) ACA的初级保健支付增加幅度可能太小,不足以对初级保健和农村医生短缺产生重大影响。有针对性和显著的初级保健支付奖金可能是一个更有效的政策,以减少特定的医生短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increases in primary care physician income due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 - continued tweaking of physician payment.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) authorizes several changes to the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) system that are designed to increase primary care physician personal income and reduce geographic variation in primary care payment. In this brief, the ACA-authorized primary care payment adjustments are modeled in a prototypical rural primary care practice to assess both the potential impact on physician personal income and the likelihood that the changes will achieve the desired policy outcome. Key Findings. (1) The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) increases physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice an average of $3,537 (1.9%) in 2010 compared to baseline income as if the ACA were not enacted. In 2011, physician personal income in a prototypical primary care practice increases by an average of $12,013 (9.3%) compared to baseline. (2) Due to Geographic Practice Cost Index (GPCI) changes legislated by the ACA, physician personal income increases are greater in entire-state Medicare payment localities than in states with multiple Medicare payment localities. (3) The requirement that at least 60% of a practice's furnished services must be specific "primary care services" to receive the ACA primary care bonus may eliminate eligibility for rural primary care practices that tend to offer more procedures (thus proportionally fewer primary care services) than urban/suburban practices. (4) The ACA primary care payment increases may be too small to have a significant impact on primary care and rural physician shortages. Targeted and significant primary care payment bonuses may be a more effective policy to reduce specific physician shortages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rural policy brief
Rural policy brief Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信