药物的比较疗效研究。

Daniel McNeel Lane
{"title":"药物的比较疗效研究。","authors":"Daniel McNeel Lane","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative effectiveness studies of medications or, more appropriately, studies comparing the safety and efficacy of drugs have been conducted for decades, particularly for cancer chemotherapy. Research oncologists can stratify individuals participating in studies using prognostic criteria based on tissue diagnosis and disease staging. Conversely, research cardiologists, in particular those evaluating drugs for atherosclerotic vascular disease, have had to stratify individuals using criteria based on the risk of having a vascular event (ie, coronary heart disease risk). During the past 20 years, new imaging techniques, such as coronary calcium scoring, that are able to screen asymptomatic populations for atherosclerosis have been developed. In the future, studies comparing drugs for cardiovascular disease should be based on the presence of disease, such as atherosclerosis, rather than on the risk of a vascular event.</p>","PeriodicalId":10978,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in investigational drugs","volume":"11 9","pages":"987-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness studies of medications.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel McNeel Lane\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Comparative effectiveness studies of medications or, more appropriately, studies comparing the safety and efficacy of drugs have been conducted for decades, particularly for cancer chemotherapy. Research oncologists can stratify individuals participating in studies using prognostic criteria based on tissue diagnosis and disease staging. Conversely, research cardiologists, in particular those evaluating drugs for atherosclerotic vascular disease, have had to stratify individuals using criteria based on the risk of having a vascular event (ie, coronary heart disease risk). During the past 20 years, new imaging techniques, such as coronary calcium scoring, that are able to screen asymptomatic populations for atherosclerosis have been developed. In the future, studies comparing drugs for cardiovascular disease should be based on the presence of disease, such as atherosclerosis, rather than on the risk of a vascular event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in investigational drugs\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"987-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in investigational drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物的比较有效性研究,或者更恰当地说,比较药物的安全性和有效性的研究已经进行了几十年,特别是癌症化疗。研究肿瘤学家可以使用基于组织诊断和疾病分期的预后标准对参与研究的个体进行分层。相反,研究心脏病的专家,特别是那些评估动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病药物的专家,不得不使用基于血管事件风险(即冠心病风险)的标准对个体进行分层。在过去的20年里,新的成像技术,如冠状动脉钙评分,能够筛选无症状人群的动脉粥样硬化已经发展。在未来,比较心血管疾病药物的研究应该基于疾病的存在,如动脉粥样硬化,而不是血管事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness studies of medications.

Comparative effectiveness studies of medications or, more appropriately, studies comparing the safety and efficacy of drugs have been conducted for decades, particularly for cancer chemotherapy. Research oncologists can stratify individuals participating in studies using prognostic criteria based on tissue diagnosis and disease staging. Conversely, research cardiologists, in particular those evaluating drugs for atherosclerotic vascular disease, have had to stratify individuals using criteria based on the risk of having a vascular event (ie, coronary heart disease risk). During the past 20 years, new imaging techniques, such as coronary calcium scoring, that are able to screen asymptomatic populations for atherosclerosis have been developed. In the future, studies comparing drugs for cardiovascular disease should be based on the presence of disease, such as atherosclerosis, rather than on the risk of a vascular event.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信