从声学分割到语言处理:来自光学成像的证据。

Frontiers in neuroenergetics Pub Date : 2010-06-23 eCollection Date: 2010-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnene.2010.00013
Hellmuth Obrig, Sonja Rossi, Silke Telkemeyer, Isabell Wartenburger
{"title":"从声学分割到语言处理:来自光学成像的证据。","authors":"Hellmuth Obrig,&nbsp;Sonja Rossi,&nbsp;Silke Telkemeyer,&nbsp;Isabell Wartenburger","doi":"10.3389/fnene.2010.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use \"anchors\" to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, \"guide\" the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development.</p>","PeriodicalId":88242,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroenergetics","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Hellmuth Obrig,&nbsp;Sonja Rossi,&nbsp;Silke Telkemeyer,&nbsp;Isabell Wartenburger\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnene.2010.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use \\\"anchors\\\" to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, \\\"guide\\\" the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroenergetics\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroenergetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroenergetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

在幼儿语言习得和外语学习过程中,将听觉流分割成单词和短语是一个复杂的过程。直观地,学习者使用“锚点”将语音流分割成有意义的单位,如单词和短语。在语段(如语音)或超语段(如韵律)层面上的规律可以提供这样的锚点。关于这两种语言线索的神经元处理,在成人中有左半球对节段信息的优势和右半球对超节段信息的偏好的报道。虽然侧化在许多高级认知功能中很常见,但它在语言中的突出地位也可能是理解婴儿语言网络快速出现以及我们成年后轻松掌握语言的关键。这里的一个问题是,半球偏侧化是由语言输入本身驱动的,还是非语言因素,特别是声学因素,“指导”了偏侧化过程。在方法上,功能性磁共振成像为这样的调查提供了无与伦比的解剖细节。然而,仪器噪声、实验限制和对脑电图评估的干扰限制了它的适用性,特别是在婴儿中,也在研究听觉和语言处理之间的联系时。光学方法有可能填补这一空白。在此,我们回顾了近年来使用光学成像来研究语言发展中分割和基本听觉特征分析的半球差异的一些研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.

From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.

From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.

From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.

During language acquisition in infancy and when learning a foreign language, the segmentation of the auditory stream into words and phrases is a complex process. Intuitively, learners use "anchors" to segment the acoustic speech stream into meaningful units like words and phrases. Regularities on a segmental (e.g., phonological) or suprasegmental (e.g., prosodic) level can provide such anchors. Regarding the neuronal processing of these two kinds of linguistic cues a left-hemispheric dominance for segmental and a right-hemispheric bias for suprasegmental information has been reported in adults. Though lateralization is common in a number of higher cognitive functions, its prominence in language may also be a key to understanding the rapid emergence of the language network in infants and the ease at which we master our language in adulthood. One question here is whether the hemispheric lateralization is driven by linguistic input per se or whether non-linguistic, especially acoustic factors, "guide" the lateralization process. Methodologically, functional magnetic resonance imaging provides unsurpassed anatomical detail for such an enquiry. However, instrumental noise, experimental constraints and interference with EEG assessment limit its applicability, pointedly in infants and also when investigating the link between auditory and linguistic processing. Optical methods have the potential to fill this gap. Here we review a number of recent studies using optical imaging to investigate hemispheric differences during segmentation and basic auditory feature analysis in language development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信