阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知障碍和正常老年人的认知维度:开发通用指标。

Robert M Chapman, Mark Mapstone, John W McCrary, Margaret N Gardner, Laura E Bachus, Elizabeth Degrush, Lindsey A Reilly, Tiffany C Sandoval, Maria D Guillily
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病、轻度认知障碍和正常老年人的认知维度:开发通用指标。","authors":"Robert M Chapman, Mark Mapstone, John W McCrary, Margaret N Gardner, Laura E Bachus, Elizabeth Degrush, Lindsey A Reilly, Tiffany C Sandoval, Maria D Guillily","doi":"10.2174/1874827901003010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this research was to assess similarity in cognitive factor structures underlying neuropsychological test performance of elders belonging to three clinical groups: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and normal elderly. We administered a battery of neuropsychological tests to 214 elderly participants in the groups. First, the underlying cognitive structure of a Combined-Set of AD, MCI, and Control subjects was determined by Principal Components Analysis (PCA), including quantitative relationships (loadings) between the test measures and the factors. The PCA resolved 17 neuropsychological test measures into 6 interpretable factors, accounting for 78% of the variance. This cognitive structure was compared with separate cognitive structures from an AD-Set, an MCI-Set, and a Control-Set (different individuals in each set) in additional PCA using Procrustes factor rotation. Analysis of congruence coefficients between each set and the Combined-Set by a bootstrapping statistical procedure supported the factor invariance hypothesis. These close similarities across groups in their underlying neuropsychological dimensions support the use of a common metric system (the factor structure of a Combined-Set) for measuring neuropsychological factors in all these elderly individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":89035,"journal":{"name":"The open geriatric medicine journal","volume":"3 10","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922059/pdf/nihms188339.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Dimensions in Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Elderly: Developing a Common Metric.\",\"authors\":\"Robert M Chapman, Mark Mapstone, John W McCrary, Margaret N Gardner, Laura E Bachus, Elizabeth Degrush, Lindsey A Reilly, Tiffany C Sandoval, Maria D Guillily\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874827901003010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this research was to assess similarity in cognitive factor structures underlying neuropsychological test performance of elders belonging to three clinical groups: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and normal elderly. We administered a battery of neuropsychological tests to 214 elderly participants in the groups. First, the underlying cognitive structure of a Combined-Set of AD, MCI, and Control subjects was determined by Principal Components Analysis (PCA), including quantitative relationships (loadings) between the test measures and the factors. The PCA resolved 17 neuropsychological test measures into 6 interpretable factors, accounting for 78% of the variance. This cognitive structure was compared with separate cognitive structures from an AD-Set, an MCI-Set, and a Control-Set (different individuals in each set) in additional PCA using Procrustes factor rotation. Analysis of congruence coefficients between each set and the Combined-Set by a bootstrapping statistical procedure supported the factor invariance hypothesis. These close similarities across groups in their underlying neuropsychological dimensions support the use of a common metric system (the factor structure of a Combined-Set) for measuring neuropsychological factors in all these elderly individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"volume\":\"3 10\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2922059/pdf/nihms188339.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open geriatric medicine journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827901003010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open geriatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874827901003010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估三个临床组别中老年人神经心理测试表现背后的认知因素结构的相似性:阿尔茨海默病(AD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和正常老年人。我们对各组的 214 名老年参与者进行了一系列神经心理学测试。首先,我们通过主成分分析(PCA)确定了AD、MCI和对照组受试者的基本认知结构,包括测试指标与因子之间的定量关系(载荷)。PCA 将 17 个神经心理测试指标分解为 6 个可解释的因子,占方差的 78%。在使用 Procrustes 因子旋转的附加 PCA 中,该认知结构与来自 AD 集、MCI 集和对照集(每个集中的个体不同)的单独认知结构进行了比较。通过 Bootstrapping 统计程序对各组与组合组之间的一致性系数进行分析,支持了因子不变性假设。各组之间在神经心理学基础维度上的相似性支持使用共同的度量系统(组合集的因子结构)来测量所有这些老年人的神经心理学因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cognitive Dimensions in Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Elderly: Developing a Common Metric.

Cognitive Dimensions in Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Normal Elderly: Developing a Common Metric.

The aim of this research was to assess similarity in cognitive factor structures underlying neuropsychological test performance of elders belonging to three clinical groups: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and normal elderly. We administered a battery of neuropsychological tests to 214 elderly participants in the groups. First, the underlying cognitive structure of a Combined-Set of AD, MCI, and Control subjects was determined by Principal Components Analysis (PCA), including quantitative relationships (loadings) between the test measures and the factors. The PCA resolved 17 neuropsychological test measures into 6 interpretable factors, accounting for 78% of the variance. This cognitive structure was compared with separate cognitive structures from an AD-Set, an MCI-Set, and a Control-Set (different individuals in each set) in additional PCA using Procrustes factor rotation. Analysis of congruence coefficients between each set and the Combined-Set by a bootstrapping statistical procedure supported the factor invariance hypothesis. These close similarities across groups in their underlying neuropsychological dimensions support the use of a common metric system (the factor structure of a Combined-Set) for measuring neuropsychological factors in all these elderly individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信