胃腺癌:计算机断层扫描(CT)对术前分期有用吗?

Esther Uña Cidón, Isabel Jiménez Cuenca
{"title":"胃腺癌:计算机断层扫描(CT)对术前分期有用吗?","authors":"Esther Uña Cidón,&nbsp;Isabel Jiménez Cuenca","doi":"10.4137/cmo.s2641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Although multiple studies testing the accuracy of CT in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma have been carried out, their results are controversial. Whilst some authors claim that CT is an accurate method for preoperatively staging gastric cancer, others have advocated the contrary. Because of this discrepancy we have retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT findings compared with histopathological results in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery and preoperative staging CT of quality were included in the study. The size, gastric wall thickening, presence of lymphadenopathy, adjacent organ invasion and location of the gastric mass was recorded. Early tumors (T1 and T2) and more advanced tumors (T3 and T4) were grouped together. CT staging was correlated with the final histopathological stage (TNM). The global results were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two cases were included with fifty-five being male and a median age of 67 years (range 33-91). CT correctly identified the location of the tumor in 56 (53% antropyloric, 18% subcardial). Median time from CT scan to surgery was fourteen days (range 2-49). In T detection: T1/T2 and T3/T4 with sensitivity of 70% and 61%. Lymph node involvement: Sensitivity 49%. Overstaged in 47% Understaged in 75%. Specificity of 53%. Nine patients with colon-mesocolon (5 patients) and pancreas (4 patients) invasion. Sensitivity 44% and specificity 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spiral CT is not an accurate method in predicting preoperative stages in gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":88451,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","volume":"3 ","pages":"91-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/cmo.s2641","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging?\",\"authors\":\"Esther Uña Cidón,&nbsp;Isabel Jiménez Cuenca\",\"doi\":\"10.4137/cmo.s2641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Although multiple studies testing the accuracy of CT in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma have been carried out, their results are controversial. Whilst some authors claim that CT is an accurate method for preoperatively staging gastric cancer, others have advocated the contrary. Because of this discrepancy we have retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT findings compared with histopathological results in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Seventy-two patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery and preoperative staging CT of quality were included in the study. The size, gastric wall thickening, presence of lymphadenopathy, adjacent organ invasion and location of the gastric mass was recorded. Early tumors (T1 and T2) and more advanced tumors (T3 and T4) were grouped together. CT staging was correlated with the final histopathological stage (TNM). The global results were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two cases were included with fifty-five being male and a median age of 67 years (range 33-91). CT correctly identified the location of the tumor in 56 (53% antropyloric, 18% subcardial). Median time from CT scan to surgery was fourteen days (range 2-49). In T detection: T1/T2 and T3/T4 with sensitivity of 70% and 61%. Lymph node involvement: Sensitivity 49%. Overstaged in 47% Understaged in 75%. Specificity of 53%. Nine patients with colon-mesocolon (5 patients) and pancreas (4 patients) invasion. Sensitivity 44% and specificity 96%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spiral CT is not an accurate method in predicting preoperative stages in gastric cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical medicine. Oncology\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"91-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/cmo.s2641\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical medicine. Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s2641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/cmo.s2641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景与目的:虽然已有多项研究验证了CT在胃腺癌术前分期中的准确性,但其结果存在争议。虽然一些作者声称CT是胃癌术前分期的准确方法,但另一些人则主张相反。由于这种差异,我们回顾性回顾了胃腺癌患者术前CT表现与组织病理学结果的比较。患者和方法:本研究纳入72例经诊断为胃癌并行有治愈潜力的手术和术前CT分期的患者。记录胃肿物的大小、胃壁增厚、有无淋巴结病变、邻近脏器侵犯及位置。早期肿瘤(T1、T2)和晚期肿瘤(T3、T4)合并。CT分期与最终组织病理分期(TNM)相关。总体结果以敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)表示。结果:纳入72例,其中55例为男性,中位年龄67岁(33-91岁)。CT正确识别肿瘤位置56例(53%幽门,18%心下)。从CT扫描到手术的中位时间为14天(范围2-49天)。T检测:T1/T2和T3/T4,灵敏度分别为70%和61%。淋巴结受累:敏感性49%。47%的人表演过度,75%的人表演不足。特异性为53%。结肠-结肠系膜侵犯9例(5例),胰腺侵犯4例(4例)。敏感性44%,特异性96%。结论:螺旋CT不能准确预测胃癌术前分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging?

Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging?

Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging?

Background and purpose: Although multiple studies testing the accuracy of CT in the preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma have been carried out, their results are controversial. Whilst some authors claim that CT is an accurate method for preoperatively staging gastric cancer, others have advocated the contrary. Because of this discrepancy we have retrospectively reviewed preoperative CT findings compared with histopathological results in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Patients and methods: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery and preoperative staging CT of quality were included in the study. The size, gastric wall thickening, presence of lymphadenopathy, adjacent organ invasion and location of the gastric mass was recorded. Early tumors (T1 and T2) and more advanced tumors (T3 and T4) were grouped together. CT staging was correlated with the final histopathological stage (TNM). The global results were expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: Seventy-two cases were included with fifty-five being male and a median age of 67 years (range 33-91). CT correctly identified the location of the tumor in 56 (53% antropyloric, 18% subcardial). Median time from CT scan to surgery was fourteen days (range 2-49). In T detection: T1/T2 and T3/T4 with sensitivity of 70% and 61%. Lymph node involvement: Sensitivity 49%. Overstaged in 47% Understaged in 75%. Specificity of 53%. Nine patients with colon-mesocolon (5 patients) and pancreas (4 patients) invasion. Sensitivity 44% and specificity 96%.

Conclusion: Spiral CT is not an accurate method in predicting preoperative stages in gastric cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信