医疗保险医师费用:数字背后的数据。

Laura A Dummit
{"title":"医疗保险医师费用:数字背后的数据。","authors":"Laura A Dummit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicare's physician fee schedule distributes nearly $60 billion annually and is a critical determinant of individual physicians' incomes, beneficiaries' access to health care services, and Medicare spending, as well as the basis for physician fees used by many private payers. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on data derived from expert judgment and other sources to update the fee schedule. Although CMS's methods and data for maintaining the fee schedule have improved over the years, concerns remain about medical specialty society involvement and the lack of an effective \"counterweight\" to vested interests in establishing and updating the relative values in the fee schedule. This issue brief reviews the data used in the fee schedule, including the new, multispecialty practice expense survey, and the role of the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee.</p>","PeriodicalId":87188,"journal":{"name":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","volume":" 838","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare physician fees: the data behind the numbers.\",\"authors\":\"Laura A Dummit\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medicare's physician fee schedule distributes nearly $60 billion annually and is a critical determinant of individual physicians' incomes, beneficiaries' access to health care services, and Medicare spending, as well as the basis for physician fees used by many private payers. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on data derived from expert judgment and other sources to update the fee schedule. Although CMS's methods and data for maintaining the fee schedule have improved over the years, concerns remain about medical specialty society involvement and the lack of an effective \\\"counterweight\\\" to vested interests in establishing and updating the relative values in the fee schedule. This issue brief reviews the data used in the fee schedule, including the new, multispecialty practice expense survey, and the role of the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"volume\":\" 838\",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issue brief (George Washington University. National Health Policy Forum : 2005)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保险的医生收费计划每年分配近600亿美元,是决定个人医生收入、受益人获得医疗保健服务和医疗保险支出的关键因素,也是许多私人支付者使用的医生收费基础。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)依靠来自专家判断和其他来源的数据来更新收费时间表。尽管CMS维持收费表的方法和数据在过去几年里有所改进,但人们仍然担心医学专业协会的参与,以及在建立和更新收费表的相对价值时缺乏对既得利益的有效“平衡”。本期简要回顾了费用表中使用的数据,包括新的多专业实践费用调查,以及美国医学协会/专业协会相对价值量表更新委员会的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicare physician fees: the data behind the numbers.

Medicare's physician fee schedule distributes nearly $60 billion annually and is a critical determinant of individual physicians' incomes, beneficiaries' access to health care services, and Medicare spending, as well as the basis for physician fees used by many private payers. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on data derived from expert judgment and other sources to update the fee schedule. Although CMS's methods and data for maintaining the fee schedule have improved over the years, concerns remain about medical specialty society involvement and the lack of an effective "counterweight" to vested interests in establishing and updating the relative values in the fee schedule. This issue brief reviews the data used in the fee schedule, including the new, multispecialty practice expense survey, and the role of the American Medical Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信