回顾高尔基:在追踪神经元组织构造过程中背景影响的历史考察

Lawrence Kruger , Thomas S. Otis , Matthew Shtrahman
{"title":"回顾高尔基:在追踪神经元组织构造过程中背景影响的历史考察","authors":"Lawrence Kruger ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Otis ,&nbsp;Matthew Shtrahman","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concepts underlying the connectivity of neurons and the dynamics of interaction required to explain information processing have undergone significant change over the past century. A re-examination of the evolution of the modern view in historical context reveals that rules for connectivity have changed in a manner that might be expected from critical analysis enabled by technical advance. A retrospective examination of some germane issues that moved Camillo Golgi to question the widely held dogma of his era reveals network principles that could not have been recognized a century ago. The currently evolving rules of cellular discontinuity and interaction have proven sufficiently complex to justify the arguments of critical skepticism that sustain scientific progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9291,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Reviews","volume":"66 1","pages":"Pages 68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.07.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Golgi in retrospect: A historiographic examination of contextual influence in tracing the constructs of neuronal organization\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence Kruger ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Otis ,&nbsp;Matthew Shtrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The concepts underlying the connectivity of neurons and the dynamics of interaction required to explain information processing have undergone significant change over the past century. A re-examination of the evolution of the modern view in historical context reveals that rules for connectivity have changed in a manner that might be expected from critical analysis enabled by technical advance. A retrospective examination of some germane issues that moved Camillo Golgi to question the widely held dogma of his era reveals network principles that could not have been recognized a century ago. The currently evolving rules of cellular discontinuity and interaction have proven sufficiently complex to justify the arguments of critical skepticism that sustain scientific progress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 68-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017310000755\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165017310000755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的一个世纪里,解释信息处理所需的神经元连接和相互作用动力学的概念发生了重大变化。在历史背景下对现代观点演变的重新审视表明,连接规则已经以一种可能从技术进步所带来的批判性分析中预期的方式发生了变化。对促使卡米洛·高尔基质疑他那个时代广为接受的教条的一些相关问题的回顾性研究揭示了一个世纪前不可能被认识到的网络原则。目前不断演变的细胞不连续性和相互作用的规则已被证明足够复杂,足以证明维持科学进步的批判性怀疑主义的论点是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Golgi in retrospect: A historiographic examination of contextual influence in tracing the constructs of neuronal organization

The concepts underlying the connectivity of neurons and the dynamics of interaction required to explain information processing have undergone significant change over the past century. A re-examination of the evolution of the modern view in historical context reveals that rules for connectivity have changed in a manner that might be expected from critical analysis enabled by technical advance. A retrospective examination of some germane issues that moved Camillo Golgi to question the widely held dogma of his era reveals network principles that could not have been recognized a century ago. The currently evolving rules of cellular discontinuity and interaction have proven sufficiently complex to justify the arguments of critical skepticism that sustain scientific progress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Research Reviews
Brain Research Reviews 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信