长期周围性面瘫患者咀嚼侧边偏好的临床和肌电图研究。

Adriana Rahal, Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez
{"title":"长期周围性面瘫患者咀嚼侧边偏好的临床和肌电图研究。","authors":"Adriana Rahal,&nbsp;Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) usually affects the facial nerve in part or in whole on one side of the face. Most patients with acute PFP find it difficult to chew on the paralyzed side, especially due to compromised buccinator function. In addition, the sagging of the ipsilateral lip commissure tends to compromise lip competence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of long-standing PFP upon mastication, relating to clinical mastication sidedness as determined by clinical and electromyographic activity of the masseters. The study included 27 male and female subjects aged 16-69 years with permanent natural dentition and long-standing PFP. Patients answered questions on their mastication habits before and after onset of PFP and were submitted to clinical myofunctional examination and electromyographical tests of the masseters during clenching and habitual mastication. According to the anamnesis, 77.8 % claimed to prefer chewing on the unaffected side. Clinically, 70% presented a lateral preference in mastication. In the clinical evaluation the buccinators and orbicularis oris differed significantly (p = 0.025) between the healthy and the paralyzed side. Only 22.2% of the patients showed increased thickness of the contralateral masseters. No statistically significant electromyographic difference was observed between the masseters on the affected and unaffected side. Conclusions In general indicated that subjects with flaccid-stage PFP for 6 months or longer preferred to masticate on the unaffected side. No significant clinical or electromyographic differences were found in masseter activity between the affected and unaffected side in this patient sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":77635,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","volume":"35 ","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and electromyographic study of lateral preference in mastication in patients with longstanding peripheral facial paralysis.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Rahal,&nbsp;Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) usually affects the facial nerve in part or in whole on one side of the face. Most patients with acute PFP find it difficult to chew on the paralyzed side, especially due to compromised buccinator function. In addition, the sagging of the ipsilateral lip commissure tends to compromise lip competence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of long-standing PFP upon mastication, relating to clinical mastication sidedness as determined by clinical and electromyographic activity of the masseters. The study included 27 male and female subjects aged 16-69 years with permanent natural dentition and long-standing PFP. Patients answered questions on their mastication habits before and after onset of PFP and were submitted to clinical myofunctional examination and electromyographical tests of the masseters during clenching and habitual mastication. According to the anamnesis, 77.8 % claimed to prefer chewing on the unaffected side. Clinically, 70% presented a lateral preference in mastication. In the clinical evaluation the buccinators and orbicularis oris differed significantly (p = 0.025) between the healthy and the paralyzed side. Only 22.2% of the patients showed increased thickness of the contralateral masseters. No statistically significant electromyographic difference was observed between the masseters on the affected and unaffected side. Conclusions In general indicated that subjects with flaccid-stage PFP for 6 months or longer preferred to masticate on the unaffected side. No significant clinical or electromyographic differences were found in masseter activity between the affected and unaffected side in this patient sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"19-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of orofacial myology : official publication of the International Association of Orofacial Myology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

周围性面瘫(PFP)通常影响一侧面部的部分或全部面神经。大多数急性PFP患者发现瘫痪侧咀嚼困难,特别是由于颊肌功能受损。此外,同侧唇连合的下垂往往会损害唇的能力。本研究的目的是评估长期PFP对咀嚼的影响,与临床咀嚼侧边性有关,由咬肌的临床和肌电图活动决定。研究对象包括27名男性和女性,年龄16-69岁,具有永久自然牙列和长期PFP。患者回答PFP发病前后的咀嚼习惯,并接受临床肌功能检查和咬合及习惯性咀嚼时咬肌肌电图检查。根据记忆,77.8%的人声称更喜欢咀嚼未受影响的一侧。临床上,70%的患者在咀嚼时表现为侧边偏向。在临床评价中,健康侧和瘫痪侧的扣肌和口轮匝肌差异有统计学意义(p = 0.025)。只有22.2%的患者表现为对侧咬肌厚度增加。患侧和未患侧的咬肌肌电图差异无统计学意义。结论一般情况下,6个月或更长时间的松弛期PFP患者倾向于在未受影响的一侧咀嚼。在该患者样本中,在受影响侧和未受影响侧的咬肌活动中没有发现显著的临床或肌电图差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and electromyographic study of lateral preference in mastication in patients with longstanding peripheral facial paralysis.

Peripheral facial paralysis (PFP) usually affects the facial nerve in part or in whole on one side of the face. Most patients with acute PFP find it difficult to chew on the paralyzed side, especially due to compromised buccinator function. In addition, the sagging of the ipsilateral lip commissure tends to compromise lip competence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of long-standing PFP upon mastication, relating to clinical mastication sidedness as determined by clinical and electromyographic activity of the masseters. The study included 27 male and female subjects aged 16-69 years with permanent natural dentition and long-standing PFP. Patients answered questions on their mastication habits before and after onset of PFP and were submitted to clinical myofunctional examination and electromyographical tests of the masseters during clenching and habitual mastication. According to the anamnesis, 77.8 % claimed to prefer chewing on the unaffected side. Clinically, 70% presented a lateral preference in mastication. In the clinical evaluation the buccinators and orbicularis oris differed significantly (p = 0.025) between the healthy and the paralyzed side. Only 22.2% of the patients showed increased thickness of the contralateral masseters. No statistically significant electromyographic difference was observed between the masseters on the affected and unaffected side. Conclusions In general indicated that subjects with flaccid-stage PFP for 6 months or longer preferred to masticate on the unaffected side. No significant clinical or electromyographic differences were found in masseter activity between the affected and unaffected side in this patient sample.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信