[对医院、私人诊所和研究的全面骨盆底问卷的验证]。

Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau Pub Date : 2009-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-19 DOI:10.1159/000301098
Kaven Baessler, Carsten Kempkensteffen
{"title":"[对医院、私人诊所和研究的全面骨盆底问卷的验证]。","authors":"Kaven Baessler,&nbsp;Carsten Kempkensteffen","doi":"10.1159/000301098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate a German pelvic floor questionnaire that integrates bladder, bowel and sexual function, pelvic organ prolapse, severity, bothersomeness and condition-specific quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full psychometric testing of a self- and an interviewer-administered questionnaire was performed in 63 urogynaecological patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Missing data did not exceed 4% for any question. The questionnaire clearly distinguished between urogynaecological and other gynaecological (n = 24) populations. Urodynamics, stress test and prolapse quantification correlated with the questionnaire. Cronbach's C values in the self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires were: bladder domain 0.86 and 0.77, bowel function 0.76 and 0.77, prolapse symptoms 0.82 and 0.83, sexual function 0.80 and 0.71. kappa values in the test-retest analyses varied from 0.61 to 1.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pelvic floor questionnaire assessed all aspects of pelvic floor function in a reproducible and valid fashion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12827,"journal":{"name":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","volume":"49 4","pages":"299-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000301098","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation of a comprehensive pelvic floor questionnaire for the hospital, private practice and research].\",\"authors\":\"Kaven Baessler,&nbsp;Carsten Kempkensteffen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000301098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate a German pelvic floor questionnaire that integrates bladder, bowel and sexual function, pelvic organ prolapse, severity, bothersomeness and condition-specific quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Full psychometric testing of a self- and an interviewer-administered questionnaire was performed in 63 urogynaecological patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Missing data did not exceed 4% for any question. The questionnaire clearly distinguished between urogynaecological and other gynaecological (n = 24) populations. Urodynamics, stress test and prolapse quantification correlated with the questionnaire. Cronbach's C values in the self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires were: bladder domain 0.86 and 0.77, bowel function 0.76 and 0.77, prolapse symptoms 0.82 and 0.83, sexual function 0.80 and 0.71. kappa values in the test-retest analyses varied from 0.61 to 1.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pelvic floor questionnaire assessed all aspects of pelvic floor function in a reproducible and valid fashion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"299-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000301098\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000301098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynakologisch-geburtshilfliche Rundschau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000301098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是验证德国盆底问卷,该问卷整合了膀胱,肠道和性功能,盆腔器官脱垂,严重程度,烦恼和疾病特异性生活质量。方法:对63例泌尿妇科患者进行自我心理测试和访谈问卷调查。结果:所有问题的数据缺失率均不超过4%。问卷清楚地区分了泌尿妇科和其他妇科人群(n = 24)。尿动力学、压力测试和脱垂量化与问卷相关。自填问卷和访谈问卷的Cronbach’s C值分别为:膀胱域0.86和0.77,肠功能0.76和0.77,脱垂症状0.82和0.83,性功能0.80和0.71。测试-重测分析中的Kappa值从0.61到1.0不等。结论:盆底问卷以可重复和有效的方式评估盆底功能的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validation of a comprehensive pelvic floor questionnaire for the hospital, private practice and research].

Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a German pelvic floor questionnaire that integrates bladder, bowel and sexual function, pelvic organ prolapse, severity, bothersomeness and condition-specific quality of life.

Methods: Full psychometric testing of a self- and an interviewer-administered questionnaire was performed in 63 urogynaecological patients.

Results: Missing data did not exceed 4% for any question. The questionnaire clearly distinguished between urogynaecological and other gynaecological (n = 24) populations. Urodynamics, stress test and prolapse quantification correlated with the questionnaire. Cronbach's C values in the self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires were: bladder domain 0.86 and 0.77, bowel function 0.76 and 0.77, prolapse symptoms 0.82 and 0.83, sexual function 0.80 and 0.71. kappa values in the test-retest analyses varied from 0.61 to 1.0.

Conclusions: The pelvic floor questionnaire assessed all aspects of pelvic floor function in a reproducible and valid fashion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信