毒蕈碱异构调节的抗精神病潜力。

Thomas M Bridges, Evan P LeBois, Corey R Hopkins, Michael R Wood, Carrie K Jones, P Jeffrey Conn, Craig W Lindsley
{"title":"毒蕈碱异构调节的抗精神病潜力。","authors":"Thomas M Bridges, Evan P LeBois, Corey R Hopkins, Michael R Wood, Carrie K Jones, P Jeffrey Conn, Craig W Lindsley","doi":"10.1358/dnp.2010.23.4.1416977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia emerged over 50 years ago based on clinical observations with both anticholinergics and pan-muscarinic agonists. Not until the 1990s did the cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia receive renewed enthusiasm based on clinical data with xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(1)/M(4)-preferring orthosteric agonist. In a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients, xanomeline not only improved cognitive performance, but also reduced psychotic behaviors. This encouraging data spurred a second clinical trial in schizophrenic patients, wherein xanomeline significantly improved the positive, negative and cognitive symptom clusters. However, the question remained: Was the antipsychotic efficacy due to activation of M(1), M(4) or both M(1)/M(4)? Classical orthosteric ligands lacked the muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity required to address this key question. More recently, functional assays have allowed for the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric (acetylcholine) site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. Recently, allosteric ligands, with unprecedented selectivity for either M(1) or M(4), have been discovered and have demonstrated comparable efficacy to xanomeline in preclinical antipsychotic and cognition models. These data suggest that selective allosteric activation of either M(1) or M(4) has antipsychotic potential through distinct, yet complimentary mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":11325,"journal":{"name":"Drug news & perspectives","volume":"23 4","pages":"229-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780339/pdf/nihms761222.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas M Bridges, Evan P LeBois, Corey R Hopkins, Michael R Wood, Carrie K Jones, P Jeffrey Conn, Craig W Lindsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1358/dnp.2010.23.4.1416977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia emerged over 50 years ago based on clinical observations with both anticholinergics and pan-muscarinic agonists. Not until the 1990s did the cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia receive renewed enthusiasm based on clinical data with xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(1)/M(4)-preferring orthosteric agonist. In a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients, xanomeline not only improved cognitive performance, but also reduced psychotic behaviors. This encouraging data spurred a second clinical trial in schizophrenic patients, wherein xanomeline significantly improved the positive, negative and cognitive symptom clusters. However, the question remained: Was the antipsychotic efficacy due to activation of M(1), M(4) or both M(1)/M(4)? Classical orthosteric ligands lacked the muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity required to address this key question. More recently, functional assays have allowed for the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric (acetylcholine) site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. Recently, allosteric ligands, with unprecedented selectivity for either M(1) or M(4), have been discovered and have demonstrated comparable efficacy to xanomeline in preclinical antipsychotic and cognition models. These data suggest that selective allosteric activation of either M(1) or M(4) has antipsychotic potential through distinct, yet complimentary mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug news & perspectives\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"229-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4780339/pdf/nihms761222.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug news & perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1358/dnp.2010.23.4.1416977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug news & perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1358/dnp.2010.23.4.1416977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

50 多年前,根据对抗胆碱能药物和泛毒蕈碱激动剂的临床观察,出现了精神分裂症的胆碱能假说。直到 20 世纪 90 年代,一种毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体 M(1)/M(4)偏好正交激动剂--沙诺美林(xanomeline)的临床数据再次激发了人们对精神分裂症胆碱能假说的热情。在一项针对阿尔茨海默氏症患者的临床试验中,夏诺美林不仅改善了认知能力,还减少了精神病行为。这一令人鼓舞的数据推动了在精神分裂症患者中进行的第二次临床试验,结果显示,赛诺美林显著改善了患者的阳性、阴性和认知症状群。然而,问题依然存在:抗精神病药效是由于激活了 M(1)、M(4),还是同时激活了 M(1)/M(4)?经典的正交配体缺乏解决这一关键问题所需的毒蕈碱受体亚型选择性。最近,通过功能测试发现了与异位点结合的配体,这些结合点与正位点(乙酰胆碱)不同,在结构上不太保守,因此具有较高的受体亚型选择性。最近,人们发现了对 M(1)或 M(4)具有前所未有的选择性的异构配体,并在临床前抗精神病和认知模型中显示出与夏诺美林相当的疗效。这些数据表明,选择性异位激活 M(1)或 M(4)可通过不同但互补的机制发挥抗精神病潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation.

The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation.

The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation.

The antipsychotic potential of muscarinic allosteric modulation.

The cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia emerged over 50 years ago based on clinical observations with both anticholinergics and pan-muscarinic agonists. Not until the 1990s did the cholinergic hypothesis of schizophrenia receive renewed enthusiasm based on clinical data with xanomeline, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M(1)/M(4)-preferring orthosteric agonist. In a clinical trial with Alzheimer's patients, xanomeline not only improved cognitive performance, but also reduced psychotic behaviors. This encouraging data spurred a second clinical trial in schizophrenic patients, wherein xanomeline significantly improved the positive, negative and cognitive symptom clusters. However, the question remained: Was the antipsychotic efficacy due to activation of M(1), M(4) or both M(1)/M(4)? Classical orthosteric ligands lacked the muscarinic receptor subtype selectivity required to address this key question. More recently, functional assays have allowed for the discovery of ligands that bind at allosteric sites, binding sites distinct from the orthosteric (acetylcholine) site, which are structurally less conserved and thereby afford high levels of receptor subtype selectivity. Recently, allosteric ligands, with unprecedented selectivity for either M(1) or M(4), have been discovered and have demonstrated comparable efficacy to xanomeline in preclinical antipsychotic and cognition models. These data suggest that selective allosteric activation of either M(1) or M(4) has antipsychotic potential through distinct, yet complimentary mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug news & perspectives
Drug news & perspectives 医学-药学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信