[论《全心论》解剖插图的来源]。

Hideshi Matsumoto, Tatsuo Sakai
{"title":"[论《全心论》解剖插图的来源]。","authors":"Hideshi Matsumoto,&nbsp;Tatsuo Sakai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quanti-xinlun by Hobson is frequently considered to have introduced European scientific anatomy to modern China. It contains numbers of precise anatomical illustrations which surpass by far those found in the Chinese traditional medical books. The impact of Quanti-xinlun derived mainly from the optical effects based on the anatomical illustrations. The present study clarifies for the first time the sources of the anatomical illustrations as being mostly from Wilson's \"A System of Human Anatomy\" and Carpenter's \"Animal Physiology\". However in Quanti-xinlun, the editorial sophistication present in the source books was abandoned, with the result that the anatomical contents were extremely minimized. In view of modern Chinese medical history, Quanti-xinlun provided an outline of anatomical knowledge, rather than a textbook encompassing anatomical details. It is concluded that Quanti-xinlun was intended to introduce the European way of thinking at the level of popular science.</p>","PeriodicalId":74310,"journal":{"name":"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]","volume":"55 4","pages":"463-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[On the sources of the anatomical illustrations appearing in Quanti-xinlun].\",\"authors\":\"Hideshi Matsumoto,&nbsp;Tatsuo Sakai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quanti-xinlun by Hobson is frequently considered to have introduced European scientific anatomy to modern China. It contains numbers of precise anatomical illustrations which surpass by far those found in the Chinese traditional medical books. The impact of Quanti-xinlun derived mainly from the optical effects based on the anatomical illustrations. The present study clarifies for the first time the sources of the anatomical illustrations as being mostly from Wilson's \\\"A System of Human Anatomy\\\" and Carpenter's \\\"Animal Physiology\\\". However in Quanti-xinlun, the editorial sophistication present in the source books was abandoned, with the result that the anatomical contents were extremely minimized. In view of modern Chinese medical history, Quanti-xinlun provided an outline of anatomical knowledge, rather than a textbook encompassing anatomical details. It is concluded that Quanti-xinlun was intended to introduce the European way of thinking at the level of popular science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"463-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon ishigaku zasshi. [Journal of Japanese history of medicine]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

霍布森的《全心论》通常被认为是将欧洲的科学解剖学引入现代中国。它包含了大量精确的解剖插图,远远超过了中国传统医学书籍。以解剖图例为基础的光学效应为主要影响因素。本研究首次澄清了解剖插图的来源,主要来自威尔逊的“人体解剖学系统”和卡彭特的“动物生理学”。然而,在《全心论》中,却抛弃了原书中所呈现的编辑的复杂性,其结果是解剖学的内容被极大地减少了。从中国近代医学史来看,《全心论》提供的是一个解剖学知识的大纲,而不是一本包含解剖学细节的教科书。认为《全反心论》意在普及科学层面的欧洲思维方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[On the sources of the anatomical illustrations appearing in Quanti-xinlun].

Quanti-xinlun by Hobson is frequently considered to have introduced European scientific anatomy to modern China. It contains numbers of precise anatomical illustrations which surpass by far those found in the Chinese traditional medical books. The impact of Quanti-xinlun derived mainly from the optical effects based on the anatomical illustrations. The present study clarifies for the first time the sources of the anatomical illustrations as being mostly from Wilson's "A System of Human Anatomy" and Carpenter's "Animal Physiology". However in Quanti-xinlun, the editorial sophistication present in the source books was abandoned, with the result that the anatomical contents were extremely minimized. In view of modern Chinese medical history, Quanti-xinlun provided an outline of anatomical knowledge, rather than a textbook encompassing anatomical details. It is concluded that Quanti-xinlun was intended to introduce the European way of thinking at the level of popular science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信