医患沟通:成年癌症患者使用补充和替代医学。

Byeongsang Oh, Phyllis Butow, Barbara Mullan, Stephen Clarke, Martin Tattersall, Michael Boyer, Philip Beale, Janette Vardy, Nick Pavlakis, Linda Larke
{"title":"医患沟通:成年癌症患者使用补充和替代医学。","authors":"Byeongsang Oh,&nbsp;Phyllis Butow,&nbsp;Barbara Mullan,&nbsp;Stephen Clarke,&nbsp;Martin Tattersall,&nbsp;Michael Boyer,&nbsp;Philip Beale,&nbsp;Janette Vardy,&nbsp;Nick Pavlakis,&nbsp;Linda Larke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this survey was to examine patient-doctor communication about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by adult patients with cancer and compare patients' satisfaction with the consultation between patients who had and those who had not discussed the use of CAM with their doctors. Oncologists from three hospitals screened patients for eligibility. Eligible patients were mailed a letter of invitation with a questionnaire (N = 1,323). Three hundred eighty-one questionnaires were returned. Sixty-five percent of cancer patients used at least one form of CAM. Use of CAM was not discussed with the oncologist by 55% of respondents using biologically based CAM and by 80% of those using non-biologically based CAM since the diagnosis of cancer. Patients who discussed the use of biologic CAM with their oncologists were more satisfied with the consultation than those who had not (p = .027), whereas there were no significant differences between patients who discussed or did not discuss use of non-biologically based CAM (p = .102). A substantial proportion of cancer patients do not discuss the use of CAM with their oncologists. It is important to improve patient-doctor communication about the use of CAM to increase patients' satisfaction with the oncology consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":87409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","volume":"8 2","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-doctor communication: use of complementary and alternative medicine by adult patients with cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Byeongsang Oh,&nbsp;Phyllis Butow,&nbsp;Barbara Mullan,&nbsp;Stephen Clarke,&nbsp;Martin Tattersall,&nbsp;Michael Boyer,&nbsp;Philip Beale,&nbsp;Janette Vardy,&nbsp;Nick Pavlakis,&nbsp;Linda Larke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this survey was to examine patient-doctor communication about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by adult patients with cancer and compare patients' satisfaction with the consultation between patients who had and those who had not discussed the use of CAM with their doctors. Oncologists from three hospitals screened patients for eligibility. Eligible patients were mailed a letter of invitation with a questionnaire (N = 1,323). Three hundred eighty-one questionnaires were returned. Sixty-five percent of cancer patients used at least one form of CAM. Use of CAM was not discussed with the oncologist by 55% of respondents using biologically based CAM and by 80% of those using non-biologically based CAM since the diagnosis of cancer. Patients who discussed the use of biologic CAM with their oncologists were more satisfied with the consultation than those who had not (p = .027), whereas there were no significant differences between patients who discussed or did not discuss use of non-biologically based CAM (p = .102). A substantial proportion of cancer patients do not discuss the use of CAM with their oncologists. It is important to improve patient-doctor communication about the use of CAM to increase patients' satisfaction with the oncology consultation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"56-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本调查的目的是检查成年癌症患者使用辅助替代医学(CAM)的医患沟通情况,并比较有和没有与医生讨论过使用辅助替代医学的患者对咨询的满意度。来自三家医院的肿瘤学家筛选了患者的资格。向符合条件的患者邮寄邀请函和问卷(N = 1323)。共收回了381份问卷。65%的癌症患者至少使用一种CAM。自诊断癌症以来,55%使用生物基础CAM的受访者和80%使用非生物基础CAM的受访者没有与肿瘤学家讨论CAM的使用。与肿瘤学家讨论生物辅助治疗的患者比未讨论生物辅助治疗的患者对咨询更满意(p = 0.027),而讨论或未讨论非生物辅助治疗的患者之间没有显著差异(p = 0.102)。相当大比例的癌症患者不与肿瘤科医生讨论辅助治疗的使用。提高辅助医学的医患沟通对提高患者对肿瘤会诊的满意度具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-doctor communication: use of complementary and alternative medicine by adult patients with cancer.

The purpose of this survey was to examine patient-doctor communication about the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by adult patients with cancer and compare patients' satisfaction with the consultation between patients who had and those who had not discussed the use of CAM with their doctors. Oncologists from three hospitals screened patients for eligibility. Eligible patients were mailed a letter of invitation with a questionnaire (N = 1,323). Three hundred eighty-one questionnaires were returned. Sixty-five percent of cancer patients used at least one form of CAM. Use of CAM was not discussed with the oncologist by 55% of respondents using biologically based CAM and by 80% of those using non-biologically based CAM since the diagnosis of cancer. Patients who discussed the use of biologic CAM with their oncologists were more satisfied with the consultation than those who had not (p = .027), whereas there were no significant differences between patients who discussed or did not discuss use of non-biologically based CAM (p = .102). A substantial proportion of cancer patients do not discuss the use of CAM with their oncologists. It is important to improve patient-doctor communication about the use of CAM to increase patients' satisfaction with the oncology consultation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信