自扩式食管支架:Ultraflex与Choostent的比较。

Chirurgia italiana Pub Date : 2009-09-01
Davide Bona, Letizia Laface, Stefano Siboni, Moshe Schaffer, Daniela Baldoli, Andrea Sironi, Francesca Sorba, Luigi Bonavina
{"title":"自扩式食管支架:Ultraflex与Choostent的比较。","authors":"Davide Bona,&nbsp;Letizia Laface,&nbsp;Stefano Siboni,&nbsp;Moshe Schaffer,&nbsp;Daniela Baldoli,&nbsp;Andrea Sironi,&nbsp;Francesca Sorba,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two types of covered self-expanding metal stents were compared in a consecutive series of 57 patients. Stent placement was successful in all patients. No procedure-related deaths were observed. The overall hospital morbidity was 7%. No significant differences in the efficacy of palliation of dysphagia, rate of complications, and survival rates were seen using the two types of stent. An endoscopic reintervention was required in 14% of the patients. Both stents proved to be safely removable in the short term follow-up, and the benefit of temporary insertion was documented in patients with primary oesophageal neoplasms prior to chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy and in those with anastomotic strictures/leaks. A multidisciplinary strategy, guided by the concept that a stent should not represent the only, definitive treatment modality, may improve the quality of life of patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 5-6","pages":"641-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Self-expanding oesophageal stents: comparison of Ultraflex and Choostent].\",\"authors\":\"Davide Bona,&nbsp;Letizia Laface,&nbsp;Stefano Siboni,&nbsp;Moshe Schaffer,&nbsp;Daniela Baldoli,&nbsp;Andrea Sironi,&nbsp;Francesca Sorba,&nbsp;Luigi Bonavina\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two types of covered self-expanding metal stents were compared in a consecutive series of 57 patients. Stent placement was successful in all patients. No procedure-related deaths were observed. The overall hospital morbidity was 7%. No significant differences in the efficacy of palliation of dysphagia, rate of complications, and survival rates were seen using the two types of stent. An endoscopic reintervention was required in 14% of the patients. Both stents proved to be safely removable in the short term follow-up, and the benefit of temporary insertion was documented in patients with primary oesophageal neoplasms prior to chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy and in those with anastomotic strictures/leaks. A multidisciplinary strategy, guided by the concept that a stent should not represent the only, definitive treatment modality, may improve the quality of life of patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"volume\":\"61 5-6\",\"pages\":\"641-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在连续57例患者中比较两种类型的有盖自膨胀金属支架。所有患者支架置入均成功。未观察到与手术相关的死亡。医院总发病率为7%。两种支架在缓解吞咽困难的疗效、并发症发生率和生存率方面均无显著差异。14%的患者需要内窥镜再干预。在短期随访中,两种支架都被证明是安全可移除的,并且在化疗或放化疗前的原发性食管肿瘤患者和吻合口狭窄/泄漏患者中,临时插入的益处被记录下来。一个多学科的策略,在支架不应该代表唯一的、确定的治疗方式的概念指导下,可以改善晚期食管癌患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Self-expanding oesophageal stents: comparison of Ultraflex and Choostent].

Two types of covered self-expanding metal stents were compared in a consecutive series of 57 patients. Stent placement was successful in all patients. No procedure-related deaths were observed. The overall hospital morbidity was 7%. No significant differences in the efficacy of palliation of dysphagia, rate of complications, and survival rates were seen using the two types of stent. An endoscopic reintervention was required in 14% of the patients. Both stents proved to be safely removable in the short term follow-up, and the benefit of temporary insertion was documented in patients with primary oesophageal neoplasms prior to chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy and in those with anastomotic strictures/leaks. A multidisciplinary strategy, guided by the concept that a stent should not represent the only, definitive treatment modality, may improve the quality of life of patients with advanced oesophageal carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信