Luca Maria Siani, Fabrizio Ferranti, Antonio De Carlo, Marco Marzano, Alberto Quintiliani
{"title":"早期胃癌淋巴结切除范围的调节。文献综述及腹腔镜的作用[j]。","authors":"Luca Maria Siani, Fabrizio Ferranti, Antonio De Carlo, Marco Marzano, Alberto Quintiliani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early gastric cancer is a gastric carcinoma confined to the mucosa or submucosa of the stomach, regardless of the presence of nodal involvement, which in any event is present only in about 20% of patients. This uncommon nodal involvement is a distinct clinical problem, because standard D2 lymphadenectomy constitutes overtreatment in more than 80% of patients. A review of the literature shows that the present surgical tendency for those patients who do not fulfill the Gotoda criteria (i.e. not amenable to an endoscopic mucosal or submucosal dissection) is to modulate the extent of the lymphadenectomy on the basis of the characteristics of the cancer: for mucosal early gastric cancers located in the upper third of the stomach, gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy is sufficient; if located in the middle third the extent should be D1 +alpha (D1 + n. 7), while if located in the distal third, D1 +beta (D1 + n. 7,8a,9) is the best option. In all these cases, minimally invasive surgery can be a valid option, with results which are comparable to those of open surgery, but with all the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. For submucosal early gastric cancers, D1 +beta lymphadenectomy is indicated for neoplasia > 20 mm and of the protuberance type, while, for all other submucosal early gastric cancers (> 20 mm and of the depressed type, penetrating more than 500 micron into the submucosal layer, not differentiated, with lymphovascular invasion), standard D2 lymphadenectomy is the safest oncological procedure. In these cases, too, the laparoscopic approach can be a safe option, even if it requires greater laparoscopic skill.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 5-6","pages":"551-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Modulation of the extent of lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer. Review of the literature and role of laparoscopy].\",\"authors\":\"Luca Maria Siani, Fabrizio Ferranti, Antonio De Carlo, Marco Marzano, Alberto Quintiliani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early gastric cancer is a gastric carcinoma confined to the mucosa or submucosa of the stomach, regardless of the presence of nodal involvement, which in any event is present only in about 20% of patients. This uncommon nodal involvement is a distinct clinical problem, because standard D2 lymphadenectomy constitutes overtreatment in more than 80% of patients. A review of the literature shows that the present surgical tendency for those patients who do not fulfill the Gotoda criteria (i.e. not amenable to an endoscopic mucosal or submucosal dissection) is to modulate the extent of the lymphadenectomy on the basis of the characteristics of the cancer: for mucosal early gastric cancers located in the upper third of the stomach, gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy is sufficient; if located in the middle third the extent should be D1 +alpha (D1 + n. 7), while if located in the distal third, D1 +beta (D1 + n. 7,8a,9) is the best option. In all these cases, minimally invasive surgery can be a valid option, with results which are comparable to those of open surgery, but with all the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. For submucosal early gastric cancers, D1 +beta lymphadenectomy is indicated for neoplasia > 20 mm and of the protuberance type, while, for all other submucosal early gastric cancers (> 20 mm and of the depressed type, penetrating more than 500 micron into the submucosal layer, not differentiated, with lymphovascular invasion), standard D2 lymphadenectomy is the safest oncological procedure. In these cases, too, the laparoscopic approach can be a safe option, even if it requires greater laparoscopic skill.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"volume\":\"61 5-6\",\"pages\":\"551-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早期胃癌是一种局限于胃粘膜或粘膜下层的胃癌,与有无淋巴结累及无关,在任何情况下仅在约20%的患者中出现。这种不常见的淋巴结受累是一个明显的临床问题,因为标准D2淋巴结切除术在80%以上的患者中构成过度治疗。文献回顾表明,对于不符合后田氏标准(即不适合内镜下粘膜或粘膜下解剖)的患者,目前的手术倾向是根据肿瘤的特点调整淋巴结切除术的范围:对于位于胃上三分之一的粘膜早期胃癌,胃切除术加D1淋巴结切除术就足够了;如果位于中间三分之一,则应选择D1 + α (D1 + n. 7),而如果位于远三分之一,则D1 + β (D1 + n. 7,8a,9)是最佳选择。在所有这些情况下,微创手术是一种有效的选择,其结果与开放手术相当,但具有腹腔镜方法的所有优点。对于粘膜下早期胃癌,D1 + β淋巴结切除术适用于瘤变> 20mm和隆起型,而对于所有其他粘膜下早期胃癌(> 20mm和凹陷型,穿透粘膜下层超过500微米,未分化,伴淋巴血管浸润),标准D2淋巴结切除术是最安全的肿瘤学手术。在这些情况下,腹腔镜方法也是一个安全的选择,即使它需要更高的腹腔镜技术。
[Modulation of the extent of lymphadenectomy in early gastric cancer. Review of the literature and role of laparoscopy].
Early gastric cancer is a gastric carcinoma confined to the mucosa or submucosa of the stomach, regardless of the presence of nodal involvement, which in any event is present only in about 20% of patients. This uncommon nodal involvement is a distinct clinical problem, because standard D2 lymphadenectomy constitutes overtreatment in more than 80% of patients. A review of the literature shows that the present surgical tendency for those patients who do not fulfill the Gotoda criteria (i.e. not amenable to an endoscopic mucosal or submucosal dissection) is to modulate the extent of the lymphadenectomy on the basis of the characteristics of the cancer: for mucosal early gastric cancers located in the upper third of the stomach, gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy is sufficient; if located in the middle third the extent should be D1 +alpha (D1 + n. 7), while if located in the distal third, D1 +beta (D1 + n. 7,8a,9) is the best option. In all these cases, minimally invasive surgery can be a valid option, with results which are comparable to those of open surgery, but with all the advantages of the laparoscopic approach. For submucosal early gastric cancers, D1 +beta lymphadenectomy is indicated for neoplasia > 20 mm and of the protuberance type, while, for all other submucosal early gastric cancers (> 20 mm and of the depressed type, penetrating more than 500 micron into the submucosal layer, not differentiated, with lymphovascular invasion), standard D2 lymphadenectomy is the safest oncological procedure. In these cases, too, the laparoscopic approach can be a safe option, even if it requires greater laparoscopic skill.