一项评估萨里金斯顿医院正畸科转诊信中信息质量的研究。

Maryam Izadi, Daljit S Gill, Farhad B Naini
{"title":"一项评估萨里金斯顿医院正畸科转诊信中信息质量的研究。","authors":"Maryam Izadi,&nbsp;Daljit S Gill,&nbsp;Farhad B Naini","doi":"10.1308/135576110791013712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the quality of information included in referral letters sent to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referral letters sent by both general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialist orthodontists were analysed retrospectively in order to ascertain the percentage meeting the inclusion criteria as suggested by Mossey (2006) and the British Orthodontic Society (2008) for the quality of information included in an ideal orthodontic referral letter. Thirty-five consecutive letters sent between May and September 2005 and 206 letters sent in the same period in 2008 were collected by hand and analysed against the inclusion criteria. The numbers of referral letters received from GDPs, specialist orthodontists, and others sources were also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the referrals sent in 2005 and 2008 included 40-50% of the referral inclusion points. This was despite an almost twofold increase in the number of referral letters received from specialist orthodontic practitioners in 2008. The majority of the letters, from both GDPs and specialists, did not include details of the oral hygiene or caries status of the patient, or an indication of their motivation towards treatment. None of the referral letters included a plaque score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The main weaknesses in the quality of information provided in referral letters were that in more than 80% of the letters there was no mention of the patient's medical history and no comment on caries status, the standard of oral hygiene, patient motivation for treatment, or an Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need score. The quality of information included in referral letters sent to Kingston Hospital orthodontic department needs to be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":79454,"journal":{"name":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","volume":"17 2","pages":"73-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576110791013712","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study to assess the quality of information in referral letters to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Izadi,&nbsp;Daljit S Gill,&nbsp;Farhad B Naini\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/135576110791013712\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the quality of information included in referral letters sent to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referral letters sent by both general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialist orthodontists were analysed retrospectively in order to ascertain the percentage meeting the inclusion criteria as suggested by Mossey (2006) and the British Orthodontic Society (2008) for the quality of information included in an ideal orthodontic referral letter. Thirty-five consecutive letters sent between May and September 2005 and 206 letters sent in the same period in 2008 were collected by hand and analysed against the inclusion criteria. The numbers of referral letters received from GDPs, specialist orthodontists, and others sources were also determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the referrals sent in 2005 and 2008 included 40-50% of the referral inclusion points. This was despite an almost twofold increase in the number of referral letters received from specialist orthodontic practitioners in 2008. The majority of the letters, from both GDPs and specialists, did not include details of the oral hygiene or caries status of the patient, or an indication of their motivation towards treatment. None of the referral letters included a plaque score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The main weaknesses in the quality of information provided in referral letters were that in more than 80% of the letters there was no mention of the patient's medical history and no comment on caries status, the standard of oral hygiene, patient motivation for treatment, or an Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need score. The quality of information included in referral letters sent to Kingston Hospital orthodontic department needs to be improved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"73-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1308/135576110791013712\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576110791013712\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/135576110791013712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目的:评估英国萨里Kingston医院正畸科转诊信息的质量。方法:回顾性分析普通牙科医生(GDPs)和专科正畸医生发送的转诊信,以确定符合Mossey(2006)和英国正畸学会(2008)建议的纳入标准的百分比,以确定理想正畸转诊信中包含的信息质量。在2005年5月至9月期间发出的35封连续信件及2008年同期发出的206封信件均由人手收集,并按纳入准则进行分析。此外,我们亦统计从本地生产总值、专科正畸医生及其他来源收到的转介信数目。结果:2005年和2008年的转诊中,大部分转诊包含了40-50%的转诊包含点。尽管2008年收到的牙齿矫正专科医生的转介信数量增加了近两倍。来自国内生产总值和专家的大多数信件都没有包括患者口腔卫生或龋齿状况的详细信息,也没有表明他们接受治疗的动机。没有推荐信包括斑块评分。结论:转诊信信息质量的主要缺陷是80%以上的转诊信未提及患者的病史、龋齿状况、口腔卫生标准、患者治疗动机或正畸治疗需求指数评分。送往金斯顿医院正畸科的转诊信中包含的信息质量有待提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study to assess the quality of information in referral letters to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey.

Aim: To assess the quality of information included in referral letters sent to the orthodontic department at Kingston Hospital, Surrey, UK.

Methods: Referral letters sent by both general dental practitioners (GDPs) and specialist orthodontists were analysed retrospectively in order to ascertain the percentage meeting the inclusion criteria as suggested by Mossey (2006) and the British Orthodontic Society (2008) for the quality of information included in an ideal orthodontic referral letter. Thirty-five consecutive letters sent between May and September 2005 and 206 letters sent in the same period in 2008 were collected by hand and analysed against the inclusion criteria. The numbers of referral letters received from GDPs, specialist orthodontists, and others sources were also determined.

Results: Most of the referrals sent in 2005 and 2008 included 40-50% of the referral inclusion points. This was despite an almost twofold increase in the number of referral letters received from specialist orthodontic practitioners in 2008. The majority of the letters, from both GDPs and specialists, did not include details of the oral hygiene or caries status of the patient, or an indication of their motivation towards treatment. None of the referral letters included a plaque score.

Conclusion: The main weaknesses in the quality of information provided in referral letters were that in more than 80% of the letters there was no mention of the patient's medical history and no comment on caries status, the standard of oral hygiene, patient motivation for treatment, or an Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need score. The quality of information included in referral letters sent to Kingston Hospital orthodontic department needs to be improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信