内皮角膜移植术:由一名DSAEK外科医生切割前组织和手术后组织的并发症发生率和内皮细胞存活率的比较。

Mark A Terry
{"title":"内皮角膜移植术:由一名DSAEK外科医生切割前组织和手术后组织的并发症发生率和内皮细胞存活率的比较。","authors":"Mark A Terry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) can be performed with donor tissue prepared with a microkeratome either by the surgeon at the time of surgery or by a technician in the eye bank days before surgery. Are the complications and endothelial survival affected by donor preparation by a surgeon vs a technician?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single surgeon at a referral practice performed 225 DSAEK procedures for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy using a similar surgical technique for all cases. Surgeon-cut tissue was used in 49 cases (group 1), and precut tissue was used in 176 cases (group 2). Retrospective analysis was done from a prospectively collected database for donor dislocations, iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF), and 6- and 12-month postoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no dislocations in group 1 and 3 dislocations in group 2 (P = .224). There were no IPGFs in group 1 and one IPGF in group 2. The preoperative donor ECD was 2948 +/- 382 for group 1 and 2728 +/- 269 for group 2. (P < .001). The cell loss at 6 months was 33% +/- 14% for group 1 and 27% +/- 13% for group 2 (P = .01), and cell loss at 12 months was 34% +/- 13% for group 1 and 27% +/- 14% for group 2 (P = .01). Six-month cell loss for 8.0-mm grafts (n=127) was 30% +/- 16% and for larger grafts (n=98) was 27% +/- 12% % (P = .296).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precut tissue for DSAEK does not increase the risk of the acute complications of graft dislocation or IPGF. Early endothelial cell loss may be less with precut tissue. Larger graft sizes did not result in significantly higher cell counts at 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":23166,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","volume":"107 ","pages":"184-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2814585/pdf/1545-6110_v107_p184.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon.\",\"authors\":\"Mark A Terry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) can be performed with donor tissue prepared with a microkeratome either by the surgeon at the time of surgery or by a technician in the eye bank days before surgery. Are the complications and endothelial survival affected by donor preparation by a surgeon vs a technician?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single surgeon at a referral practice performed 225 DSAEK procedures for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy using a similar surgical technique for all cases. Surgeon-cut tissue was used in 49 cases (group 1), and precut tissue was used in 176 cases (group 2). Retrospective analysis was done from a prospectively collected database for donor dislocations, iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF), and 6- and 12-month postoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no dislocations in group 1 and 3 dislocations in group 2 (P = .224). There were no IPGFs in group 1 and one IPGF in group 2. The preoperative donor ECD was 2948 +/- 382 for group 1 and 2728 +/- 269 for group 2. (P < .001). The cell loss at 6 months was 33% +/- 14% for group 1 and 27% +/- 13% for group 2 (P = .01), and cell loss at 12 months was 34% +/- 13% for group 1 and 27% +/- 14% for group 2 (P = .01). Six-month cell loss for 8.0-mm grafts (n=127) was 30% +/- 16% and for larger grafts (n=98) was 27% +/- 12% % (P = .296).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precut tissue for DSAEK does not increase the risk of the acute complications of graft dislocation or IPGF. Early endothelial cell loss may be less with precut tissue. Larger graft sizes did not result in significantly higher cell counts at 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"184-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2814585/pdf/1545-6110_v107_p184.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Descemet剥离自动内皮角膜移植术(DSAEK)可以在手术时由外科医生或术前由眼库的技术人员用微角膜瓣制备的供体组织进行。外科医生和技术人员的供体准备对并发症和内皮细胞存活有影响吗?方法:一名外科医生在转诊诊所使用类似的手术技术对所有病例进行了225例DSAEK手术治疗Fuchs内皮营养不良。49例(第一组)使用手术切除组织,176例(第二组)使用预切组织。回顾性分析前瞻性收集的供体脱位、医源性原发性移植物衰竭(IPGF)和术后6个月和12个月中枢内皮细胞密度(ECD)的数据库。结果:1组无脱位,3组无脱位(P = .224)。1组无IPGF, 2组1个IPGF。1组术前供体ECD为2948 +/- 382,2组为2728 +/- 269。(p < 0.001)。6个月时细胞损失1组为33% +/- 14%,2组为27% +/- 13% (P = 0.01), 12个月时细胞损失1组为34% +/- 13%,2组为27% +/- 14% (P = 0.01)。8.0 mm移植物(n=127)的六个月细胞损失为30% +/- 16%,较大移植物(n=98)的六个月细胞损失为27% +/- 12% (P = 0.296)。结论:DSAEK的预切组织不会增加移植物脱位或IPGF急性并发症的风险。预切组织的早期内皮细胞损失可能较少。在6个月时,更大的移植物尺寸并没有导致明显更高的细胞计数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon.

Purpose: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) can be performed with donor tissue prepared with a microkeratome either by the surgeon at the time of surgery or by a technician in the eye bank days before surgery. Are the complications and endothelial survival affected by donor preparation by a surgeon vs a technician?

Methods: A single surgeon at a referral practice performed 225 DSAEK procedures for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy using a similar surgical technique for all cases. Surgeon-cut tissue was used in 49 cases (group 1), and precut tissue was used in 176 cases (group 2). Retrospective analysis was done from a prospectively collected database for donor dislocations, iatrogenic primary graft failure (IPGF), and 6- and 12-month postoperative central endothelial cell density (ECD).

Results: There were no dislocations in group 1 and 3 dislocations in group 2 (P = .224). There were no IPGFs in group 1 and one IPGF in group 2. The preoperative donor ECD was 2948 +/- 382 for group 1 and 2728 +/- 269 for group 2. (P < .001). The cell loss at 6 months was 33% +/- 14% for group 1 and 27% +/- 13% for group 2 (P = .01), and cell loss at 12 months was 34% +/- 13% for group 1 and 27% +/- 14% for group 2 (P = .01). Six-month cell loss for 8.0-mm grafts (n=127) was 30% +/- 16% and for larger grafts (n=98) was 27% +/- 12% % (P = .296).

Conclusions: Precut tissue for DSAEK does not increase the risk of the acute complications of graft dislocation or IPGF. Early endothelial cell loss may be less with precut tissue. Larger graft sizes did not result in significantly higher cell counts at 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信