青光眼新老手术的比较结果。

Sameh Mosaed, Laurie Dustin, Don S Minckler
{"title":"青光眼新老手术的比较结果。","authors":"Sameh Mosaed,&nbsp;Laurie Dustin,&nbsp;Don S Minckler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcomes across Trabectome, iScience (canaloplasty), trabeculectomy, and aqueous shunts regarding intraocular pressure (IOP), adjunctive medications, and complications after glaucoma-only and combined glaucoma-phacoemulsification surgeries for open-angle glaucomas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review compares success rates, complications, efficacy, and limitations of traditional and novel glaucoma surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trabectome and canaloplasty provide modest IOP reduction with minimal intraoperative or postoperative complications. Results of Baerveldt glaucoma implant IOP reduction are comparable to trabeculectomy, but typically this shunt requires more postoperative IOP-lowering medication to achieve a success rate comparable to trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trabeculectomy is still the most effective IOP-lowering procedure performed today but continues to have the highest serious complication rates. Trabectome and canaloplasty are reasonable surgical therapy choices for patients in which IOPs in the mid-teens seem adequate.</p>","PeriodicalId":23166,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","volume":"107 ","pages":"127-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2814584/pdf/1545-6110_v107_p127.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Sameh Mosaed,&nbsp;Laurie Dustin,&nbsp;Don S Minckler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare outcomes across Trabectome, iScience (canaloplasty), trabeculectomy, and aqueous shunts regarding intraocular pressure (IOP), adjunctive medications, and complications after glaucoma-only and combined glaucoma-phacoemulsification surgeries for open-angle glaucomas.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review compares success rates, complications, efficacy, and limitations of traditional and novel glaucoma surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trabectome and canaloplasty provide modest IOP reduction with minimal intraoperative or postoperative complications. Results of Baerveldt glaucoma implant IOP reduction are comparable to trabeculectomy, but typically this shunt requires more postoperative IOP-lowering medication to achieve a success rate comparable to trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trabeculectomy is still the most effective IOP-lowering procedure performed today but continues to have the highest serious complication rates. Trabectome and canaloplasty are reasonable surgical therapy choices for patients in which IOPs in the mid-teens seem adequate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"127-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2814584/pdf/1545-6110_v107_p127.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较小梁切除术、iScience(小管成形术)、小梁切除术和水分流术治疗开角型青光眼后的眼压(IOP)、辅助药物和并发症。方法:文献回顾比较传统和新型青光眼手术方法的成功率、并发症、疗效和局限性。结果:小梁切除术和导管成形术提供适度的IOP降低,术中或术后并发症最小。Baerveldt青光眼植入物降低眼压的结果与小梁切除术相当,但通常这种分流术需要更多的术后降眼压药物才能达到与小梁切除术相当的成功率。结论:小梁切除术仍然是当今最有效的降眼压手术,但仍有最高的严重并发症发生率。小梁切除术和导管成形术是合理的手术治疗选择,患者在15岁左右的IOPs似乎足够。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma.

Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma.

Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma.

Comparative outcomes between newer and older surgeries for glaucoma.

Purpose: To compare outcomes across Trabectome, iScience (canaloplasty), trabeculectomy, and aqueous shunts regarding intraocular pressure (IOP), adjunctive medications, and complications after glaucoma-only and combined glaucoma-phacoemulsification surgeries for open-angle glaucomas.

Method: A literature review compares success rates, complications, efficacy, and limitations of traditional and novel glaucoma surgical procedures.

Results: Trabectome and canaloplasty provide modest IOP reduction with minimal intraoperative or postoperative complications. Results of Baerveldt glaucoma implant IOP reduction are comparable to trabeculectomy, but typically this shunt requires more postoperative IOP-lowering medication to achieve a success rate comparable to trabeculectomy.

Conclusion: Trabeculectomy is still the most effective IOP-lowering procedure performed today but continues to have the highest serious complication rates. Trabectome and canaloplasty are reasonable surgical therapy choices for patients in which IOPs in the mid-teens seem adequate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信