精神科药物批准使用安慰剂对照临床试验:第二部分-与个体参与者相关的伦理考虑。

David Feifel
{"title":"精神科药物批准使用安慰剂对照临床试验:第二部分-与个体参与者相关的伦理考虑。","authors":"David Feifel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is Part 2 of a two-part series on the ethical issues surrounding the use of placebo arms in clinical trials for psychiatric drugs. Part 1 discussed the ethical argument from a statistical, population-based perspective. Part 2 explores the ethical issues of placebo-controlled studies as they relate to individual psychiatric patients who may participate in them. Many patients who are candidates for psychiatric clinical trials would receive poor treatment for their mental illness under standard treatment conditions. Industry-sponsored clinical trials often provide treatment resources otherwise not available to patients at a more intense level of care than the local standard. Moreover, study design features, such as those developed at University of California, San Diego (presented herein), can mitigate the risks of placebo arms. With this in mind, clinical trials represent an ethical option for many patients with chronic mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":20822,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811140/pdf/PE_6_12_19.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials for the Approval of Psychiatric Drugs: Part II-Ethical Considerations Related to the Individual Participant.\",\"authors\":\"David Feifel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This is Part 2 of a two-part series on the ethical issues surrounding the use of placebo arms in clinical trials for psychiatric drugs. Part 1 discussed the ethical argument from a statistical, population-based perspective. Part 2 explores the ethical issues of placebo-controlled studies as they relate to individual psychiatric patients who may participate in them. Many patients who are candidates for psychiatric clinical trials would receive poor treatment for their mental illness under standard treatment conditions. Industry-sponsored clinical trials often provide treatment resources otherwise not available to patients at a more intense level of care than the local standard. Moreover, study design features, such as those developed at University of California, San Diego (presented herein), can mitigate the risks of placebo arms. With this in mind, clinical trials represent an ethical option for many patients with chronic mental illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811140/pdf/PE_6_12_19.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是关于在精神药物临床试验中使用安慰剂组的伦理问题的两部分系列文章的第2部分。第1部分从统计学和基于人口的角度讨论了伦理争论。第2部分探讨了安慰剂对照研究的伦理问题,因为它们与可能参与其中的个体精神病患者有关。许多精神病学临床试验的候选者在标准治疗条件下,他们的精神疾病会得到糟糕的治疗。行业赞助的临床试验通常为患者提供治疗资源,否则无法获得比当地标准更高的护理水平。此外,研究设计特征,如加州大学圣地亚哥分校开发的研究特征(见本文),可以减轻安慰剂组的风险。考虑到这一点,临床试验代表了许多慢性精神疾病患者的道德选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials for the Approval of Psychiatric Drugs: Part II-Ethical Considerations Related to the Individual Participant.

This is Part 2 of a two-part series on the ethical issues surrounding the use of placebo arms in clinical trials for psychiatric drugs. Part 1 discussed the ethical argument from a statistical, population-based perspective. Part 2 explores the ethical issues of placebo-controlled studies as they relate to individual psychiatric patients who may participate in them. Many patients who are candidates for psychiatric clinical trials would receive poor treatment for their mental illness under standard treatment conditions. Industry-sponsored clinical trials often provide treatment resources otherwise not available to patients at a more intense level of care than the local standard. Moreover, study design features, such as those developed at University of California, San Diego (presented herein), can mitigate the risks of placebo arms. With this in mind, clinical trials represent an ethical option for many patients with chronic mental illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信