1997 - 2006年FDA药品批准间隔:信息技术实施期间的分析与比较。

Q4 Medicine
John F Kros, Christopher M Keller
{"title":"1997 - 2006年FDA药品批准间隔:信息技术实施期间的分析与比较。","authors":"John F Kros,&nbsp;Christopher M Keller","doi":"10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The implementation of new Information Technology (IT) has been a persistent target for improving FDA review intervals. Three main categories of new drugs are studied: New Drug Application (NDA), the Supplemental New Drug Application (SNDA) and the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). This paper finds that the median review time for an ANDA was significantly longer than that of an NDA and SDNA. A comparison of application class medians revealed significant differences. Regardless of the recent focus on IT implementations at the FDA pertaining to review intervals, that focus has not yet yielded a statistically significant improvement in review times.</p>","PeriodicalId":39775,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electronic Healthcare","volume":"5 2","pages":"164-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FDA drug approval intervals from 1997 to 2006: analysis and comparison during information technology implementation.\",\"authors\":\"John F Kros,&nbsp;Christopher M Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The implementation of new Information Technology (IT) has been a persistent target for improving FDA review intervals. Three main categories of new drugs are studied: New Drug Application (NDA), the Supplemental New Drug Application (SNDA) and the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). This paper finds that the median review time for an ANDA was significantly longer than that of an NDA and SDNA. A comparison of application class medians revealed significant differences. Regardless of the recent focus on IT implementations at the FDA pertaining to review intervals, that focus has not yet yielded a statistically significant improvement in review times.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electronic Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"164-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electronic Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electronic Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEH.2009.029223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新信息技术(IT)的实施一直是改善FDA审查间隔的一个持久目标。本文主要研究了三类新药:新药申请(NDA)、补充新药申请(SNDA)和简略新药申请(ANDA)。本文发现ANDA的中位审评时间明显长于NDA和SDNA。应用类中位数的比较显示了显著的差异。尽管最近FDA关注与审查间隔有关的IT实现,但该关注尚未在审查时间上产生统计上的显着改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FDA drug approval intervals from 1997 to 2006: analysis and comparison during information technology implementation.

The implementation of new Information Technology (IT) has been a persistent target for improving FDA review intervals. Three main categories of new drugs are studied: New Drug Application (NDA), the Supplemental New Drug Application (SNDA) and the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). This paper finds that the median review time for an ANDA was significantly longer than that of an NDA and SDNA. A comparison of application class medians revealed significant differences. Regardless of the recent focus on IT implementations at the FDA pertaining to review intervals, that focus has not yet yielded a statistically significant improvement in review times.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The IJEH is an authoritative, fully-refereed international journal which presents current practice and research in the area of e-healthcare. It is dedicated to design, development, management, implementation, technology, and application issues in e-healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信