[食管癌、贲门癌诱导治疗后标准TRG分型的预后意义]。

Chirurgia italiana Pub Date : 2009-07-01
Andrea Zanoni, Giuseppe Verlatoa, Annamaria Minicozzi, Anna Tomezzoli, Simone Giacopuzzi, Mapriantonietta Di Cosmo, Ilaria Franceschetti, Edoardo Saladino, Giovanni De Manzoni
{"title":"[食管癌、贲门癌诱导治疗后标准TRG分型的预后意义]。","authors":"Andrea Zanoni,&nbsp;Giuseppe Verlatoa,&nbsp;Annamaria Minicozzi,&nbsp;Anna Tomezzoli,&nbsp;Simone Giacopuzzi,&nbsp;Mapriantonietta Di Cosmo,&nbsp;Ilaria Franceschetti,&nbsp;Edoardo Saladino,&nbsp;Giovanni De Manzoni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG) is widely used to evaluate the pathological response to induction therapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance and clinical applicability of TRG. From 2000 to 2007, 108 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (57 cases) or Siewert type I and II adenocarcinoma of the cardia (51 cases) were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in the 1st Division of General Surgery of the University of Verona. The treatment was identical for all patients and consisted of cisplatin, 5 FU and docetaxel together with 50 Gy of concurrent radiotherapy. The treatment-induced response was evaluated by TRG. Fifty-one, 24, 17, 9 and 7 patients were classified, respectively, as TRG1, 2, 3 4 and 5. Fifty-two patients died of the disease. Disease-related survival decreased with the increase in TRG class in node-negative patients (p < 0.001), while in N+ patients it was poor, irrespective of TRG class (p = 0.241). Mandard TRG is therefore useful for staging patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy, because it displays high prognostic significance. In our study, however, N was the main prognostic factor and for this reason it is mandatory to consider nodal status along with TRG. Moreover, among N negative patients, the prognosis of each different TRG class is statistically different and for this reason different TRG classes cannot be grouped together.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 4","pages":"419-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Prognostic significance of the Mandard TRG classification after induction therapy in carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia].\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Zanoni,&nbsp;Giuseppe Verlatoa,&nbsp;Annamaria Minicozzi,&nbsp;Anna Tomezzoli,&nbsp;Simone Giacopuzzi,&nbsp;Mapriantonietta Di Cosmo,&nbsp;Ilaria Franceschetti,&nbsp;Edoardo Saladino,&nbsp;Giovanni De Manzoni\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG) is widely used to evaluate the pathological response to induction therapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance and clinical applicability of TRG. From 2000 to 2007, 108 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (57 cases) or Siewert type I and II adenocarcinoma of the cardia (51 cases) were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in the 1st Division of General Surgery of the University of Verona. The treatment was identical for all patients and consisted of cisplatin, 5 FU and docetaxel together with 50 Gy of concurrent radiotherapy. The treatment-induced response was evaluated by TRG. Fifty-one, 24, 17, 9 and 7 patients were classified, respectively, as TRG1, 2, 3 4 and 5. Fifty-two patients died of the disease. Disease-related survival decreased with the increase in TRG class in node-negative patients (p < 0.001), while in N+ patients it was poor, irrespective of TRG class (p = 0.241). Mandard TRG is therefore useful for staging patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy, because it displays high prognostic significance. In our study, however, N was the main prognostic factor and for this reason it is mandatory to consider nodal status along with TRG. Moreover, among N negative patients, the prognosis of each different TRG class is statistically different and for this reason different TRG classes cannot be grouped together.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"419-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

manard肿瘤消退分级(TRG)被广泛用于评价食管癌或胃-食管交界处癌诱导治疗联合放化疗的病理反应。本研究的目的是评价TRG的预后意义和临床适用性。从2000年到2007年,维罗纳大学普通外科一科对108例食管鳞状细胞癌(57例)或siwert I型和II型贲门腺癌(51例)进行了诱导放化疗后手术治疗。所有患者的治疗方法相同,包括顺铂、5fu和多西他赛以及50 Gy的同步放疗。用TRG评价治疗诱导的反应。TRG1、2、3、4、5分别为51例、24例、17例、9例、7例。52名患者死于这种疾病。在淋巴结阴性患者中,疾病相关生存率随着TRG分级的增加而降低(p < 0.001),而在N+患者中,无论TRG分级如何,疾病相关生存率都较低(p = 0.241)。因此,标准TRG对术前放化疗患者的分期是有用的,因为它具有很高的预后意义。然而,在我们的研究中,N是主要的预后因素,因此必须将淋巴结状态与TRG一并考虑。此外,在N例阴性患者中,不同TRG分级预后有统计学差异,因此不能将不同TRG分级归为一类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Prognostic significance of the Mandard TRG classification after induction therapy in carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia].

Mandard's tumor regression grade (TRG) is widely used to evaluate the pathological response to induction therapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance and clinical applicability of TRG. From 2000 to 2007, 108 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (57 cases) or Siewert type I and II adenocarcinoma of the cardia (51 cases) were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in the 1st Division of General Surgery of the University of Verona. The treatment was identical for all patients and consisted of cisplatin, 5 FU and docetaxel together with 50 Gy of concurrent radiotherapy. The treatment-induced response was evaluated by TRG. Fifty-one, 24, 17, 9 and 7 patients were classified, respectively, as TRG1, 2, 3 4 and 5. Fifty-two patients died of the disease. Disease-related survival decreased with the increase in TRG class in node-negative patients (p < 0.001), while in N+ patients it was poor, irrespective of TRG class (p = 0.241). Mandard TRG is therefore useful for staging patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy, because it displays high prognostic significance. In our study, however, N was the main prognostic factor and for this reason it is mandatory to consider nodal status along with TRG. Moreover, among N negative patients, the prognosis of each different TRG class is statistically different and for this reason different TRG classes cannot be grouped together.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信