结直肠手术后吻合口瘘:发生率、危险因素及治疗。

Chirurgia italiana Pub Date : 2009-07-01
Enrico Erdas, Alessandro Zedda, Antonella Pitzalis, Daniela Scano, Michela Barbarossa, Simona Aresu, Sergio Licheri, Mariano Pomata, Giampaolo Farina
{"title":"结直肠手术后吻合口瘘:发生率、危险因素及治疗。","authors":"Enrico Erdas,&nbsp;Alessandro Zedda,&nbsp;Antonella Pitzalis,&nbsp;Daniela Scano,&nbsp;Michela Barbarossa,&nbsp;Simona Aresu,&nbsp;Sergio Licheri,&nbsp;Mariano Pomata,&nbsp;Giampaolo Farina","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and identify the risk factors associated with colorectal anastomotic leakage. A further objective was to investigate the therapeutic choices. We reviewed the clinical files of 124 patients who underwent mechanical end-to-end anastomosis after colorectal resection during the period 2000-2007. The mean age was 66.9 years and the male:female ratio was 1.2:1. Indications for surgery were malignant neoplasms in 109 cases (87.9%) and benign disease in 15 cases (12.1%). The anastomosis was always performed in an elective setting in the framework of a procedure of one or more stages (87.9% and 7.3% respectively). A pelvic drain was positioned in a routine manner and no protective ileostomies were constructed. Among the various risk factors, co-morbidities, ASA risk and low anastomotic level were the most important we examined. Student's t-test, the Chi-square test and Fisher's test were used for comparative univariate analysis, with significant results for p < or = 0.05. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 10.5% (13/124), but only 4.8% (6/124) required a second operation or failed to heal with simple conservative therapy. The pelvic drain was always effective in allowing the early diagnosis of leakages and limiting the spread of peritoneal inflammation. Mortality was 1.6% (2/124) overall, but, if leakages alone were considered, it increased to 15.4%. Among the risk factors examined, only low anastomotic level was confirmed by statistical analysis. In conclusion, the study confirms low anastomotic level as a negative prognostic factor for the healing of colorectal anastomosis. The pelvic drain proved to be effective in allowing early diagnosis and conservative management of leakages.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 4","pages":"407-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: incidence, risk factors and treatment].\",\"authors\":\"Enrico Erdas,&nbsp;Alessandro Zedda,&nbsp;Antonella Pitzalis,&nbsp;Daniela Scano,&nbsp;Michela Barbarossa,&nbsp;Simona Aresu,&nbsp;Sergio Licheri,&nbsp;Mariano Pomata,&nbsp;Giampaolo Farina\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and identify the risk factors associated with colorectal anastomotic leakage. A further objective was to investigate the therapeutic choices. We reviewed the clinical files of 124 patients who underwent mechanical end-to-end anastomosis after colorectal resection during the period 2000-2007. The mean age was 66.9 years and the male:female ratio was 1.2:1. Indications for surgery were malignant neoplasms in 109 cases (87.9%) and benign disease in 15 cases (12.1%). The anastomosis was always performed in an elective setting in the framework of a procedure of one or more stages (87.9% and 7.3% respectively). A pelvic drain was positioned in a routine manner and no protective ileostomies were constructed. Among the various risk factors, co-morbidities, ASA risk and low anastomotic level were the most important we examined. Student's t-test, the Chi-square test and Fisher's test were used for comparative univariate analysis, with significant results for p < or = 0.05. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 10.5% (13/124), but only 4.8% (6/124) required a second operation or failed to heal with simple conservative therapy. The pelvic drain was always effective in allowing the early diagnosis of leakages and limiting the spread of peritoneal inflammation. Mortality was 1.6% (2/124) overall, but, if leakages alone were considered, it increased to 15.4%. Among the risk factors examined, only low anastomotic level was confirmed by statistical analysis. In conclusion, the study confirms low anastomotic level as a negative prognostic factor for the healing of colorectal anastomosis. The pelvic drain proved to be effective in allowing early diagnosis and conservative management of leakages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"407-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估结直肠吻合口瘘的发生率并确定与之相关的危险因素。进一步的目标是研究治疗的选择。我们回顾了2000-2007年间124例结直肠癌术后行机械端到端吻合术的临床资料。平均年龄66.9岁,男女比例为1.2:1。手术指征为恶性肿瘤109例(87.9%),良性肿瘤15例(12.1%)。吻合总是在一个或多个阶段的手术框架中选择进行(分别为87.9%和7.3%)。以常规方式放置盆腔引流管,未建立保护性回肠造口。在各种危险因素中,合并症、ASA风险和吻合口低水平是我们研究的最重要的因素。比较单因素分析采用学生t检验、卡方检验和Fisher检验,p <或= 0.05为显著性结果。吻合口漏发生率为10.5%(13/124),仅4.8%(6/124)需要二次手术或单纯保守治疗不能愈合。盆腔引流在早期诊断渗漏和限制腹膜炎症扩散方面总是有效的。总体死亡率为1.6%(2/124),但如果单独考虑泄漏,死亡率增加到15.4%。在检查的危险因素中,只有低吻合口水平被统计分析证实。综上所述,本研究证实吻合口水平低是影响结直肠吻合口愈合的不良预后因素。盆腔引流被证明是有效的,允许早期诊断和保守处理泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: incidence, risk factors and treatment].

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and identify the risk factors associated with colorectal anastomotic leakage. A further objective was to investigate the therapeutic choices. We reviewed the clinical files of 124 patients who underwent mechanical end-to-end anastomosis after colorectal resection during the period 2000-2007. The mean age was 66.9 years and the male:female ratio was 1.2:1. Indications for surgery were malignant neoplasms in 109 cases (87.9%) and benign disease in 15 cases (12.1%). The anastomosis was always performed in an elective setting in the framework of a procedure of one or more stages (87.9% and 7.3% respectively). A pelvic drain was positioned in a routine manner and no protective ileostomies were constructed. Among the various risk factors, co-morbidities, ASA risk and low anastomotic level were the most important we examined. Student's t-test, the Chi-square test and Fisher's test were used for comparative univariate analysis, with significant results for p < or = 0.05. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 10.5% (13/124), but only 4.8% (6/124) required a second operation or failed to heal with simple conservative therapy. The pelvic drain was always effective in allowing the early diagnosis of leakages and limiting the spread of peritoneal inflammation. Mortality was 1.6% (2/124) overall, but, if leakages alone were considered, it increased to 15.4%. Among the risk factors examined, only low anastomotic level was confirmed by statistical analysis. In conclusion, the study confirms low anastomotic level as a negative prognostic factor for the healing of colorectal anastomosis. The pelvic drain proved to be effective in allowing early diagnosis and conservative management of leakages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信