{"title":"中断镇静用于早期康复可改善通气危重成人的预后","authors":"Dale M. Needham, Satish Chandolu, Jennifer Zanni","doi":"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70086-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does early provision of rehabilitation improve the likelihood of functional independence at discharge in ventilated, critically ill patients?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded assessment of some outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two tertiary medical centres in the USA.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) who had been on mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours and were expected to continue for at least another 24 hours, and who had been functionally independent two weeks before admission. Exclusion criteria included: rapid onset neuromuscular disease, cardiopulmonary arrest, irreversible disorders with high mortality, and raised intracranial pressure. Randomisation of 104 participants allotted 49 to receive the early intervention and 55 to a control group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Both groups received sedation guided by the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and underwent daily interruption of sedatives or narcotics or both, unless contraindicated. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and insulin for glycaemic control were also protocol-directed. During the daily interruption of sedation, the intervention group commenced rehabilitation as appropriate to their clinical status: passive movements for those who were unresponsive, and active assisted or active movements in supine for those who were responsive. If well tolerated, these exercises were progressed to sitting balance activities, activities of daily living, transfer training, pre-gait exercises, and walking. Extensive physiological stability criteria guided whether the intervention could be initiated or continued. Overall progression of the intervention was continued until the participant regained functional independence or was discharged from hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was return to functional independence by discharge from hospital (ie, able to walk, bathe, dress, groom, transfer, and toilet independently). Secondary outcome measures included the number of hospital days with delirium, the duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay in the ICU and in hospital, and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All participants were followed up. Functional independence at discharge was more likely in the intervention group (59% vs 35%, <em>p</em> = 0.02). The intervention group also had fewer days of delirium in hospital (median 2 vs 4 days, <em>p</em> = 0.02), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (median 3.4 vs 6.1 days, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Adverse events were rare and discontinuation of the intervention (most commonly, due to perceived patient-ventilator asynchrony) occurred in only 4% of all intervention sessions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early rehabilitation during daily interruption of sedation was safe and well tolerated. It reduced the duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation, and improved functional status at hospital discharge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50086,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"55 3","pages":"Page 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70086-8","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interruption of sedation for early rehabilitation improves outcomes in ventilated, critically ill adults\",\"authors\":\"Dale M. Needham, Satish Chandolu, Jennifer Zanni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70086-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Question</h3><p>Does early provision of rehabilitation improve the likelihood of functional independence at discharge in ventilated, critically ill patients?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded assessment of some outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Two tertiary medical centres in the USA.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Adults in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) who had been on mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours and were expected to continue for at least another 24 hours, and who had been functionally independent two weeks before admission. Exclusion criteria included: rapid onset neuromuscular disease, cardiopulmonary arrest, irreversible disorders with high mortality, and raised intracranial pressure. Randomisation of 104 participants allotted 49 to receive the early intervention and 55 to a control group.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Both groups received sedation guided by the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and underwent daily interruption of sedatives or narcotics or both, unless contraindicated. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and insulin for glycaemic control were also protocol-directed. During the daily interruption of sedation, the intervention group commenced rehabilitation as appropriate to their clinical status: passive movements for those who were unresponsive, and active assisted or active movements in supine for those who were responsive. If well tolerated, these exercises were progressed to sitting balance activities, activities of daily living, transfer training, pre-gait exercises, and walking. Extensive physiological stability criteria guided whether the intervention could be initiated or continued. Overall progression of the intervention was continued until the participant regained functional independence or was discharged from hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was return to functional independence by discharge from hospital (ie, able to walk, bathe, dress, groom, transfer, and toilet independently). Secondary outcome measures included the number of hospital days with delirium, the duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay in the ICU and in hospital, and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All participants were followed up. Functional independence at discharge was more likely in the intervention group (59% vs 35%, <em>p</em> = 0.02). The intervention group also had fewer days of delirium in hospital (median 2 vs 4 days, <em>p</em> = 0.02), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (median 3.4 vs 6.1 days, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Adverse events were rare and discontinuation of the intervention (most commonly, due to perceived patient-ventilator asynchrony) occurred in only 4% of all intervention sessions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early rehabilitation during daily interruption of sedation was safe and well tolerated. It reduced the duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation, and improved functional status at hospital discharge.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"Page 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70086-8\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004951409700868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
早期提供康复治疗是否能提高危重病人出院时功能独立的可能性?随机对照试验,隐匿分配,对部分结果进行盲法评估。在美国设立两个三级医疗中心。受试者:在医疗重症监护病房(ICU)使用机械通气少于72小时,预计至少再持续24小时,并且在入院前两周功能独立的成年人。排除标准包括:快速发作的神经肌肉疾病、心肺骤停、高死亡率的不可逆疾病和颅内压升高。104名参与者随机分配49人接受早期干预,55人作为对照组。干预措施:两组患者均按照Richmond躁动镇静量表进行镇静治疗,除非有禁忌症,否则每天均中断镇静或麻醉药治疗。脱离机械通气和胰岛素控制血糖也是有方案指导的。在每日中断镇静期间,干预组根据其临床状态开始康复:无反应者进行被动运动,有反应者进行主动辅助或主动仰卧运动。如果耐受性良好,这些锻炼可以发展为坐位平衡活动、日常生活活动、转移训练、步态前锻炼和步行。广泛的生理稳定性标准指导干预是否可以开始或继续。干预的总体进展一直持续到参与者恢复功能独立或出院。主要结局指标为出院后恢复功能独立(即能够独立行走、洗澡、穿衣、梳洗、转院和如厕)。次要结局指标包括谵妄住院天数、机械通气持续时间、在ICU和医院的住院时间以及不良事件。结果所有参与者均得到随访。干预组出院时功能独立的可能性更大(59% vs 35%, p = 0.02)。干预组谵妄住院天数更短(中位数为2天vs 4天,p = 0.02),机械通气持续时间更短(中位数为3.4天vs 6.1天,p = 0.02)。不良事件很少发生,中断干预(最常见的原因是患者与呼吸机不同步)仅占所有干预期的4%。结论每日中断镇静期间的早期康复是安全且耐受性良好的。减少谵妄和机械通气持续时间,改善出院时的功能状态。
Interruption of sedation for early rehabilitation improves outcomes in ventilated, critically ill adults
Question
Does early provision of rehabilitation improve the likelihood of functional independence at discharge in ventilated, critically ill patients?
Design
Randomised, controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded assessment of some outcomes.
Setting
Two tertiary medical centres in the USA.
Participants
Adults in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) who had been on mechanical ventilation for less than 72 hours and were expected to continue for at least another 24 hours, and who had been functionally independent two weeks before admission. Exclusion criteria included: rapid onset neuromuscular disease, cardiopulmonary arrest, irreversible disorders with high mortality, and raised intracranial pressure. Randomisation of 104 participants allotted 49 to receive the early intervention and 55 to a control group.
Interventions
Both groups received sedation guided by the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and underwent daily interruption of sedatives or narcotics or both, unless contraindicated. Weaning from mechanical ventilation and insulin for glycaemic control were also protocol-directed. During the daily interruption of sedation, the intervention group commenced rehabilitation as appropriate to their clinical status: passive movements for those who were unresponsive, and active assisted or active movements in supine for those who were responsive. If well tolerated, these exercises were progressed to sitting balance activities, activities of daily living, transfer training, pre-gait exercises, and walking. Extensive physiological stability criteria guided whether the intervention could be initiated or continued. Overall progression of the intervention was continued until the participant regained functional independence or was discharged from hospital.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was return to functional independence by discharge from hospital (ie, able to walk, bathe, dress, groom, transfer, and toilet independently). Secondary outcome measures included the number of hospital days with delirium, the duration of mechanical ventilation, lengths of stay in the ICU and in hospital, and adverse events.
Results
All participants were followed up. Functional independence at discharge was more likely in the intervention group (59% vs 35%, p = 0.02). The intervention group also had fewer days of delirium in hospital (median 2 vs 4 days, p = 0.02), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (median 3.4 vs 6.1 days, p = 0.02). Adverse events were rare and discontinuation of the intervention (most commonly, due to perceived patient-ventilator asynchrony) occurred in only 4% of all intervention sessions.
Conclusion
Early rehabilitation during daily interruption of sedation was safe and well tolerated. It reduced the duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation, and improved functional status at hospital discharge.