胎儿酒精谱系障碍:当科学、医学、公共政策和法律发生冲突时

Kenneth R. Warren, Brenda G. Hewitt
{"title":"胎儿酒精谱系障碍:当科学、医学、公共政策和法律发生冲突时","authors":"Kenneth R. Warren,&nbsp;Brenda G. Hewitt","doi":"10.1002/ddrr.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Historically, alcohol has been used for different purposes including as a part of religious observances, as a food, at times as a medicine and its well-known use as a beverage. Until relatively recently these purposes have not changed and have at times been at odds with one another, resulting in collisions among policies and practices in science, medicine, public policy and the law. One area in which this has been particularly true is that of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) where the adverse consequences of consumed alcohol on children in the womb and after birth may have been observed since antiquity, but the actions taken based on such observations have been influenced as much by the socio/cultural/political context of the times in which they were made as by evidence of harm. This article provides an overview of the inherent confusion when new scientific findings confront prevailing medical practice, the history involved in this confusion with respect to FASD, including public policy and legal issues that have arisen around alcohol and pregnancy, and the research and clinical challenges still being faced. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009;15:170–175.</p>","PeriodicalId":55176,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","volume":"15 3","pages":"170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.71","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: When science, medicine, public policy, and laws collide†\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth R. Warren,&nbsp;Brenda G. Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ddrr.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Historically, alcohol has been used for different purposes including as a part of religious observances, as a food, at times as a medicine and its well-known use as a beverage. Until relatively recently these purposes have not changed and have at times been at odds with one another, resulting in collisions among policies and practices in science, medicine, public policy and the law. One area in which this has been particularly true is that of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) where the adverse consequences of consumed alcohol on children in the womb and after birth may have been observed since antiquity, but the actions taken based on such observations have been influenced as much by the socio/cultural/political context of the times in which they were made as by evidence of harm. This article provides an overview of the inherent confusion when new scientific findings confront prevailing medical practice, the history involved in this confusion with respect to FASD, including public policy and legal issues that have arisen around alcohol and pregnancy, and the research and clinical challenges still being faced. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009;15:170–175.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"170-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ddrr.71\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ddrr.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

从历史上看,酒精被用于不同的目的,包括作为宗教仪式的一部分,作为食物,有时作为药物,以及众所周知的饮料用途。直到最近,这些目的都没有改变,而且有时彼此不一致,导致科学、医学、公共政策和法律方面的政策和实践发生冲突。在胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)领域尤其如此,在这一领域,饮酒对子宫内和出生后的儿童的不利后果可能自古以来就已观察到,但根据这种观察所采取的行动既受到危害证据的影响,也受到当时社会/文化/政治背景的影响。本文概述了当新的科学发现与主流医学实践相冲突时所固有的困惑,与FASD相关的这种困惑的历史,包括围绕酒精和怀孕产生的公共政策和法律问题,以及仍然面临的研究和临床挑战。2009年Wiley-Liss出版社出版。Dev - disability Rev 2009; 15:170-175。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: When science, medicine, public policy, and laws collide†

Historically, alcohol has been used for different purposes including as a part of religious observances, as a food, at times as a medicine and its well-known use as a beverage. Until relatively recently these purposes have not changed and have at times been at odds with one another, resulting in collisions among policies and practices in science, medicine, public policy and the law. One area in which this has been particularly true is that of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD) where the adverse consequences of consumed alcohol on children in the womb and after birth may have been observed since antiquity, but the actions taken based on such observations have been influenced as much by the socio/cultural/political context of the times in which they were made as by evidence of harm. This article provides an overview of the inherent confusion when new scientific findings confront prevailing medical practice, the history involved in this confusion with respect to FASD, including public policy and legal issues that have arisen around alcohol and pregnancy, and the research and clinical challenges still being faced. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009;15:170–175.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信