克拉德滨治疗急性髓系白血病:单一机构的经验

Mike G. Martin, John S. Welch, Kristan Augustin, Lindsay Hladnik, John F. DiPersio, Camille N. Abboud
{"title":"克拉德滨治疗急性髓系白血病:单一机构的经验","authors":"Mike G. Martin,&nbsp;John S. Welch,&nbsp;Kristan Augustin,&nbsp;Lindsay Hladnik,&nbsp;John F. DiPersio,&nbsp;Camille N. Abboud","doi":"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advances in novel therapeutics, supportive care, and postremission therapy, the outcome of high-risk and elderly patients as well as those with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. There is likely still room for improvement through optimizing conventional chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Through a pharmacy database search we identified all patients with AML treated at Washington University with cladribine-based regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four patients were identified that were treated with 2 cladribine-based regimens: CLAG (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; 300 μg subcutaneously (s.c.) days 0-5]) and CLAM (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], G-CSF [300 mg s.c. days 0-5] and mitoxantrone [10 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-3]). Complete responses were achieved in 53% of patients given induction chemotherapy and 44% of those given salvage chemotherapy. The regimens were well tolerated with minimal extramedullary toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These data suggest that cladrabine-based regimens should be further explored in both the salvage and first-line setting and might offer an attractive backbone on which to add novel therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100272,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cladribine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience\",\"authors\":\"Mike G. Martin,&nbsp;John S. Welch,&nbsp;Kristan Augustin,&nbsp;Lindsay Hladnik,&nbsp;John F. DiPersio,&nbsp;Camille N. Abboud\",\"doi\":\"10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite advances in novel therapeutics, supportive care, and postremission therapy, the outcome of high-risk and elderly patients as well as those with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. There is likely still room for improvement through optimizing conventional chemotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>Through a pharmacy database search we identified all patients with AML treated at Washington University with cladribine-based regimens.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-four patients were identified that were treated with 2 cladribine-based regimens: CLAG (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; 300 μg subcutaneously (s.c.) days 0-5]) and CLAM (cladribine [5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-5], G-CSF [300 mg s.c. days 0-5] and mitoxantrone [10 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1-3]). Complete responses were achieved in 53% of patients given induction chemotherapy and 44% of those given salvage chemotherapy. The regimens were well tolerated with minimal extramedullary toxicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These data suggest that cladrabine-based regimens should be further explored in both the salvage and first-line setting and might offer an attractive backbone on which to add novel therapies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3816/CLM.2009.n.058\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011700051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma and Myeloma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557919011700051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

背景:尽管在新疗法、支持性护理和缓解后治疗方面取得了进展,但高风险和老年患者以及复发/难治性急性髓性白血病(AML)患者的预后仍然很差。通过优化常规化疗,可能仍有改进的空间。患者和方法通过药房数据库搜索,我们确定了所有在华盛顿大学接受以克拉德里滨为基础的治疗方案的AML患者。结果24例患者接受2种以氯代宾为基础的治疗方案:CLAG(氯代宾[5 mg/m2, 1 ~ 5天)、阿糖胞苷[2 g/m2, 1 ~ 5天)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(g - csf;300 μg皮下注射(0-5天)和CLAM(克拉宾[5mg /m2 1-5天],阿糖胞苷[2g /m2 1-5天],g - csf [300mg s.c d 0-5]和米托蒽醌[10mg /m2 1-3天])。53%接受诱导化疗的患者和44%接受挽救性化疗的患者达到完全缓解。该方案耐受性良好,髓外毒性最小。结论这些数据表明,以克拉拉宾为基础的治疗方案应在抢救和一线环境中进一步探索,并可能提供一个有吸引力的支柱,以增加新的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cladribine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Institution Experience

Background

Despite advances in novel therapeutics, supportive care, and postremission therapy, the outcome of high-risk and elderly patients as well as those with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains poor. There is likely still room for improvement through optimizing conventional chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

Through a pharmacy database search we identified all patients with AML treated at Washington University with cladribine-based regimens.

Results

Twenty-four patients were identified that were treated with 2 cladribine-based regimens: CLAG (cladribine [5 mg/m2 days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m2 days 1-5] and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF; 300 μg subcutaneously (s.c.) days 0-5]) and CLAM (cladribine [5 mg/m2 days 1-5], cytarabine [2 g/m2 days 1-5], G-CSF [300 mg s.c. days 0-5] and mitoxantrone [10 mg/m2 days 1-3]). Complete responses were achieved in 53% of patients given induction chemotherapy and 44% of those given salvage chemotherapy. The regimens were well tolerated with minimal extramedullary toxicity.

Conclusion

These data suggest that cladrabine-based regimens should be further explored in both the salvage and first-line setting and might offer an attractive backbone on which to add novel therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信