在卫生政策中增加证据的使用:决策者和研究人员的做法和观点。

Danielle M Campbell, Sally Redman, Louisa Jorm, Margaret Cooke, Anthony B Zwi, Lucie Rychetnik
{"title":"在卫生政策中增加证据的使用:决策者和研究人员的做法和观点。","authors":"Danielle M Campbell,&nbsp;Sally Redman,&nbsp;Louisa Jorm,&nbsp;Margaret Cooke,&nbsp;Anthony B Zwi,&nbsp;Lucie Rychetnik","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-6-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Better communication is often suggested as fundamental to increasing the use of research evidence in policy, but little is known about how researchers and policy makers work together or about barriers to exchange. This study explored the views and practice of policy makers and researchers regarding the use of evidence in policy, including: (i) current use of research to inform policy; (ii) dissemination of and access to research findings for policy; (iii) communication and exchange between researchers and policy makers; and (iv) incentives for increasing the use of research in policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Separate but similar interview schedules were developed for policy makers and researchers. Senior policy makers from NSW Health and senior researchers from public health and health service research groups in NSW were invited to participate. Consenting participants were interviewed by an independent research company.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty eight policy makers (79% response rate) and 41 researchers (82% response rate) completed interviews. Policy makers reported rarely using research to inform policy agendas or to evaluate the impact of policy; research was used more commonly to inform policy content. Most researchers reported that their research had informed local policy, mainly by increasing awareness of an issue. Policy makers reported difficulty in accessing useful research syntheses, and only a third of researchers reported developing targeted strategies to inform policy makers of their findings. Both policy makers and researchers wanted more exchange and saw this as important for increasing the use of research evidence in policy; however, both groups reported a high level of involvement by policy makers in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policy makers and researchers recognise the potential of research to contribute to policy and are making significant attempts to integrate research into the policy process. These findings suggest four strategies to assist in increasing the use of research in policy: making research findings more accessible to policy makers; increasing opportunities for interaction between policy makers and researchers; addressing structural barriers such as research receptivity in policy agencies and a lack of incentives for academics to link with policy; and increasing the relevance of research to policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"6 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-6-21","citationCount":"188","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle M Campbell,&nbsp;Sally Redman,&nbsp;Louisa Jorm,&nbsp;Margaret Cooke,&nbsp;Anthony B Zwi,&nbsp;Lucie Rychetnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1743-8462-6-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Better communication is often suggested as fundamental to increasing the use of research evidence in policy, but little is known about how researchers and policy makers work together or about barriers to exchange. This study explored the views and practice of policy makers and researchers regarding the use of evidence in policy, including: (i) current use of research to inform policy; (ii) dissemination of and access to research findings for policy; (iii) communication and exchange between researchers and policy makers; and (iv) incentives for increasing the use of research in policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Separate but similar interview schedules were developed for policy makers and researchers. Senior policy makers from NSW Health and senior researchers from public health and health service research groups in NSW were invited to participate. Consenting participants were interviewed by an independent research company.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty eight policy makers (79% response rate) and 41 researchers (82% response rate) completed interviews. Policy makers reported rarely using research to inform policy agendas or to evaluate the impact of policy; research was used more commonly to inform policy content. Most researchers reported that their research had informed local policy, mainly by increasing awareness of an issue. Policy makers reported difficulty in accessing useful research syntheses, and only a third of researchers reported developing targeted strategies to inform policy makers of their findings. Both policy makers and researchers wanted more exchange and saw this as important for increasing the use of research evidence in policy; however, both groups reported a high level of involvement by policy makers in research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Policy makers and researchers recognise the potential of research to contribute to policy and are making significant attempts to integrate research into the policy process. These findings suggest four strategies to assist in increasing the use of research in policy: making research findings more accessible to policy makers; increasing opportunities for interaction between policy makers and researchers; addressing structural barriers such as research receptivity in policy agencies and a lack of incentives for academics to link with policy; and increasing the relevance of research to policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-6-21\",\"citationCount\":\"188\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-6-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 188

摘要

背景:更好的沟通通常被认为是增加在政策中使用研究证据的基础,但是人们对研究人员和决策者如何合作或交流的障碍知之甚少。本研究探讨了政策制定者和研究人员关于在政策中使用证据的观点和实践,包括:(i)目前使用研究为政策提供信息;传播和取得政策方面的研究成果;(三)科研人员与决策者之间的沟通与交流;(iv)鼓励在政策中增加研究的使用。方法:对政策制定者和研究人员制定单独但相似的访谈时间表。新南威尔士州卫生部的高级决策者和新南威尔士州公共卫生和卫生服务研究小组的高级研究人员被邀请参加。一家独立研究公司对同意的参与者进行了采访。结果:38名决策者(79%)和41名研究人员(82%)完成了访谈。据报告,政策制定者很少利用研究为政策议程提供信息或评估政策的影响;研究更常用来为政策内容提供信息。大多数研究人员报告说,他们的研究主要是通过提高对一个问题的认识,为当地政策提供了信息。政策制定者报告说,很难获得有用的研究综合资料,只有三分之一的科学家报告说,他们制定了有针对性的策略,让政策制定者了解他们的发现。政策制定者和研究人员都希望有更多的交流,并认为这对于增加在政策中使用研究证据很重要;然而,这两个小组都报告了政策制定者对研究的高度参与。结论:决策者和研究人员认识到研究对政策做出贡献的潜力,并且正在做出重大尝试,将研究整合到政策过程中。这些发现提出了四项战略,以协助增加在政策中使用研究:使决策者更容易获得研究结果;增加决策者和研究人员之间互动的机会;解决结构性障碍,例如政策机构对研究的接受程度以及缺乏鼓励学者与政策联系的激励措施;提高研究与政策的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.

Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.

Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers.

Background: Better communication is often suggested as fundamental to increasing the use of research evidence in policy, but little is known about how researchers and policy makers work together or about barriers to exchange. This study explored the views and practice of policy makers and researchers regarding the use of evidence in policy, including: (i) current use of research to inform policy; (ii) dissemination of and access to research findings for policy; (iii) communication and exchange between researchers and policy makers; and (iv) incentives for increasing the use of research in policy.

Methods: Separate but similar interview schedules were developed for policy makers and researchers. Senior policy makers from NSW Health and senior researchers from public health and health service research groups in NSW were invited to participate. Consenting participants were interviewed by an independent research company.

Results: Thirty eight policy makers (79% response rate) and 41 researchers (82% response rate) completed interviews. Policy makers reported rarely using research to inform policy agendas or to evaluate the impact of policy; research was used more commonly to inform policy content. Most researchers reported that their research had informed local policy, mainly by increasing awareness of an issue. Policy makers reported difficulty in accessing useful research syntheses, and only a third of researchers reported developing targeted strategies to inform policy makers of their findings. Both policy makers and researchers wanted more exchange and saw this as important for increasing the use of research evidence in policy; however, both groups reported a high level of involvement by policy makers in research.

Conclusion: Policy makers and researchers recognise the potential of research to contribute to policy and are making significant attempts to integrate research into the policy process. These findings suggest four strategies to assist in increasing the use of research in policy: making research findings more accessible to policy makers; increasing opportunities for interaction between policy makers and researchers; addressing structural barriers such as research receptivity in policy agencies and a lack of incentives for academics to link with policy; and increasing the relevance of research to policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信