超声引导下腹腔积液的经皮治疗。

Chirurgia italiana Pub Date : 2009-05-01
Guido Azzarello, Raffaele Lanteri, Cristian Rapisarda, Marco Santangelo, Agostino Racalbuto, Vincenzo Minutolo, Antonio Di Cataldo, Antonio Licata
{"title":"超声引导下腹腔积液的经皮治疗。","authors":"Guido Azzarello,&nbsp;Raffaele Lanteri,&nbsp;Cristian Rapisarda,&nbsp;Marco Santangelo,&nbsp;Agostino Racalbuto,&nbsp;Vincenzo Minutolo,&nbsp;Antonio Di Cataldo,&nbsp;Antonio Licata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abdominal abscess is a very important problem nowadays, being responsible for prolonged hospitalisation, because these infections still cause substantial morbidity and mortality. For many years, surgical drainage has been considered the best therapeutic option in abdominal abscesses but several studies have subsequently shown that the percutaneous approach is as effective as surgical drainage. Starting from this background, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not percutaneous drainage is a valid treatment of choice. In the Department of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies of the University of Catania, 451 ultrasound guided percutaneous drainages of intra-abdominal abscesses were performed on 430 patients. Abscess drainage was successful in 322/403 (80%) of postoperative abscess, in 16/18 (90%) of primitive abscesses, in 10/12 cases (85%) of acute cholecystitis, in 3/6 cases (50%) of intrahepatic abscess and in 12/12 cases (100%) of pyelonephritis. US-guided drainage is currently the gold standard in the treatment of simple abdominal abscesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":75700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia italiana","volume":"61 3","pages":"337-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of abdominal collections.\",\"authors\":\"Guido Azzarello,&nbsp;Raffaele Lanteri,&nbsp;Cristian Rapisarda,&nbsp;Marco Santangelo,&nbsp;Agostino Racalbuto,&nbsp;Vincenzo Minutolo,&nbsp;Antonio Di Cataldo,&nbsp;Antonio Licata\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Abdominal abscess is a very important problem nowadays, being responsible for prolonged hospitalisation, because these infections still cause substantial morbidity and mortality. For many years, surgical drainage has been considered the best therapeutic option in abdominal abscesses but several studies have subsequently shown that the percutaneous approach is as effective as surgical drainage. Starting from this background, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not percutaneous drainage is a valid treatment of choice. In the Department of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies of the University of Catania, 451 ultrasound guided percutaneous drainages of intra-abdominal abscesses were performed on 430 patients. Abscess drainage was successful in 322/403 (80%) of postoperative abscess, in 16/18 (90%) of primitive abscesses, in 10/12 cases (85%) of acute cholecystitis, in 3/6 cases (50%) of intrahepatic abscess and in 12/12 cases (100%) of pyelonephritis. US-guided drainage is currently the gold standard in the treatment of simple abdominal abscesses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"volume\":\"61 3\",\"pages\":\"337-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia italiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia italiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹腔脓肿是当今一个非常重要的问题,造成长期住院,因为这些感染仍然导致大量的发病率和死亡率。多年来,手术引流一直被认为是腹部脓肿的最佳治疗选择,但随后的一些研究表明,经皮入路与手术引流一样有效。从这个背景出发,本研究的目的是评估经皮引流是否是一种有效的治疗选择。在卡塔尼亚大学外科科学、器官移植和先进技术系,对430例患者进行了451例超声引导下经皮腹腔脓肿引流。术后脓肿322/403例(80%)、原始脓肿16/18例(90%)、急性胆囊炎10/12例(85%)、肝内脓肿3/6例(50%)、肾盂肾炎12/12例(100%)引流成功。美国引导引流术是目前治疗单纯性腹部脓肿的金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of abdominal collections.

Abdominal abscess is a very important problem nowadays, being responsible for prolonged hospitalisation, because these infections still cause substantial morbidity and mortality. For many years, surgical drainage has been considered the best therapeutic option in abdominal abscesses but several studies have subsequently shown that the percutaneous approach is as effective as surgical drainage. Starting from this background, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not percutaneous drainage is a valid treatment of choice. In the Department of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies of the University of Catania, 451 ultrasound guided percutaneous drainages of intra-abdominal abscesses were performed on 430 patients. Abscess drainage was successful in 322/403 (80%) of postoperative abscess, in 16/18 (90%) of primitive abscesses, in 10/12 cases (85%) of acute cholecystitis, in 3/6 cases (50%) of intrahepatic abscess and in 12/12 cases (100%) of pyelonephritis. US-guided drainage is currently the gold standard in the treatment of simple abdominal abscesses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信