Céline M Girardin, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Nathalie Alos, Cheri Deal, Céline Huot, Guy Van Vliet
{"title":"根据诊断情况对青少年克氏综合征的比较:羊膜穿刺术与临床症状。","authors":"Céline M Girardin, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Nathalie Alos, Cheri Deal, Céline Huot, Guy Van Vliet","doi":"10.1159/000232162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared the phenotype of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome diagnosed by amniocentesis or postnatally to the general population with a view to evidence-based genetic counselling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The charts of 28 patients seen between ages 12 and 18 years were reviewed. Physical and neurodevelopmental data were compared between patients diagnosed by chance (amniocentesis, group A, n = 11) or on the basis of symptoms (group B, n = 17) and the general population. Our hypothesis was that group A would have a more heterogeneous and less severe phenotype than group B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had spontaneous puberty. The 2 patient groups were similar in physical development. Mean testosteronemia became lower than the normal mean from age 14 years. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of gynecomastia and school delay in group A was not significantly different (gynecomastia 33 vs. 40%, p = 0.70; school delay 40 vs. 20%, p = 0.25). In contrast, gynecomastia (77%) and school delay (56%) were significantly more frequent in group B than in the general population (p = 0.01 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although they are based on a small number of patients, our data provide the groundwork for cautious optimism in prenatal counselling for Klinefelter syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":13225,"journal":{"name":"Hormone research","volume":"72 2","pages":"98-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000232162","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome according to the circumstances of diagnosis: amniocentesis versus clinical signs.\",\"authors\":\"Céline M Girardin, Emmanuelle Lemyre, Nathalie Alos, Cheri Deal, Céline Huot, Guy Van Vliet\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000232162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared the phenotype of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome diagnosed by amniocentesis or postnatally to the general population with a view to evidence-based genetic counselling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The charts of 28 patients seen between ages 12 and 18 years were reviewed. Physical and neurodevelopmental data were compared between patients diagnosed by chance (amniocentesis, group A, n = 11) or on the basis of symptoms (group B, n = 17) and the general population. Our hypothesis was that group A would have a more heterogeneous and less severe phenotype than group B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had spontaneous puberty. The 2 patient groups were similar in physical development. Mean testosteronemia became lower than the normal mean from age 14 years. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of gynecomastia and school delay in group A was not significantly different (gynecomastia 33 vs. 40%, p = 0.70; school delay 40 vs. 20%, p = 0.25). In contrast, gynecomastia (77%) and school delay (56%) were significantly more frequent in group B than in the general population (p = 0.01 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although they are based on a small number of patients, our data provide the groundwork for cautious optimism in prenatal counselling for Klinefelter syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hormone research\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"98-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000232162\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hormone research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000232162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000232162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29
摘要
目的:我们比较经羊膜穿刺术或产后诊断为克氏综合征的青少年与一般人群的表型,以期提供循证遗传咨询。方法:回顾性分析28例12 ~ 18岁患者的临床资料。将偶然诊断的患者(羊膜穿刺术,A组,n = 11)或根据症状诊断的患者(B组,n = 17)与普通人群的身体和神经发育数据进行比较。我们的假设是A组比b组有更多的异质性和更轻的表型。结果:所有患者都有自发性青春期。两组患者在身体发育方面相似。平均睾酮水平从14岁开始低于正常水平。与一般人群相比,A组男性乳房发育症和上学延迟的患病率无显著差异(男性乳房发育症33比40%,p = 0.70;上学延误40% vs. 20%, p = 0.25)。相比之下,B组男性乳房发育症(77%)和上学延迟(56%)的发生率明显高于普通人群(p = 0.01)。结论:虽然他们是基于少数患者,我们的数据提供了谨慎乐观的克氏综合征产前咨询的基础。
Comparison of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome according to the circumstances of diagnosis: amniocentesis versus clinical signs.
Aims: We compared the phenotype of adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome diagnosed by amniocentesis or postnatally to the general population with a view to evidence-based genetic counselling.
Methods: The charts of 28 patients seen between ages 12 and 18 years were reviewed. Physical and neurodevelopmental data were compared between patients diagnosed by chance (amniocentesis, group A, n = 11) or on the basis of symptoms (group B, n = 17) and the general population. Our hypothesis was that group A would have a more heterogeneous and less severe phenotype than group B.
Results: All patients had spontaneous puberty. The 2 patient groups were similar in physical development. Mean testosteronemia became lower than the normal mean from age 14 years. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of gynecomastia and school delay in group A was not significantly different (gynecomastia 33 vs. 40%, p = 0.70; school delay 40 vs. 20%, p = 0.25). In contrast, gynecomastia (77%) and school delay (56%) were significantly more frequent in group B than in the general population (p = 0.01 for both).
Conclusions: Although they are based on a small number of patients, our data provide the groundwork for cautious optimism in prenatal counselling for Klinefelter syndrome.