盆底肌训练治疗女性压力性尿失禁:使用PERFECT评估方案进行组训练与个例治疗的比较。

Flávia de Oliveira Camargo, Andrea Moura Rodrigues, Raquel Martins Arruda, Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori, Manoel João Batista Castello Girão, Rodrigo Aquino Castro
{"title":"盆底肌训练治疗女性压力性尿失禁:使用PERFECT评估方案进行组训练与个例治疗的比较。","authors":"Flávia de Oliveira Camargo,&nbsp;Andrea Moura Rodrigues,&nbsp;Raquel Martins Arruda,&nbsp;Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori,&nbsp;Manoel João Batista Castello Girão,&nbsp;Rodrigo Aquino Castro","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that can be done individually or in a group. The aim of this study was to compare these two types of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty women 30 to 75 years old with SUI were randomly assigned to participate in the two groups. They were evaluated before and after the treatment with the Oxford grading system, pad test, voiding diary, and the King's Health Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups experienced significant reductions in urinary leakage as measured by the pad test and bladder diary. A negative pad test was observed in about 50% of patients in both groups. There were statistically significant improvements in both muscle strength and quality of life. When the groups were compared, there were no differences in the results between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual treatment and group PFMT appear to be equally effective for improving SUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 12","pages":"1455-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pelvic floor muscle training in female stress urinary incontinence: comparison between group training and individual treatment using PERFECT assessment scheme.\",\"authors\":\"Flávia de Oliveira Camargo,&nbsp;Andrea Moura Rodrigues,&nbsp;Raquel Martins Arruda,&nbsp;Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori,&nbsp;Manoel João Batista Castello Girão,&nbsp;Rodrigo Aquino Castro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that can be done individually or in a group. The aim of this study was to compare these two types of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty women 30 to 75 years old with SUI were randomly assigned to participate in the two groups. They were evaluated before and after the treatment with the Oxford grading system, pad test, voiding diary, and the King's Health Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups experienced significant reductions in urinary leakage as measured by the pad test and bladder diary. A negative pad test was observed in about 50% of patients in both groups. There were statistically significant improvements in both muscle strength and quality of life. When the groups were compared, there were no differences in the results between them.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individual treatment and group PFMT appear to be equally effective for improving SUI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"20 12\",\"pages\":\"1455-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0971-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

摘要

介绍和假设:盆底肌肉训练(PFMT)是一种治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的方法,可以单独或集体进行。本研究的目的是比较这两种治疗方法。方法:60例30 ~ 75岁SUI患者随机分为两组。在治疗前后分别用牛津评分系统、尿垫试验、排尿日记和国王健康问卷进行评估。结果:通过尿垫试验和膀胱日记测量,两组尿漏均显著减少。两组中约50%的患者尿垫试验呈阴性。在肌肉力量和生活质量方面都有统计学上的显著改善。当两组进行比较时,他们之间的结果没有差异。结论:在改善SUI方面,个体治疗和群体PFMT似乎同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pelvic floor muscle training in female stress urinary incontinence: comparison between group training and individual treatment using PERFECT assessment scheme.

Introduction and hypothesis: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that can be done individually or in a group. The aim of this study was to compare these two types of treatment.

Methods: Sixty women 30 to 75 years old with SUI were randomly assigned to participate in the two groups. They were evaluated before and after the treatment with the Oxford grading system, pad test, voiding diary, and the King's Health Questionnaire.

Results: Both groups experienced significant reductions in urinary leakage as measured by the pad test and bladder diary. A negative pad test was observed in about 50% of patients in both groups. There were statistically significant improvements in both muscle strength and quality of life. When the groups were compared, there were no differences in the results between them.

Conclusions: Individual treatment and group PFMT appear to be equally effective for improving SUI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信