读者和非读者的语言和认知技能。

Renata Mousinho, Jane Correa
{"title":"读者和非读者的语言和认知技能。","authors":"Renata Mousinho,&nbsp;Jane Correa","doi":"10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>investigation of linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to evaluate the performance of readers and nonreaders in tasks related to several linguistic and cognitive skills and to determine the implication of the results to the clinical practice and to eduaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>participants of the study were 35 children in the process of alphabetization. The children were given tasks designed to assess their cognitive and linguistic abilities. The group of nonreaders was composed by 20 children who did not read any of the words presented on a list of 24 items. The group of readers included 15 children who read nearly every word presented on the same list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the group of readers presented a better performance on the following tasks: language development assessment; alphanumeric rapid automatized naming and working memory. There was a great variability in the performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness tasks. For the group of readers, syllabic judgment and segmentation tasks were considered easy or very easy; syllabic transposition and phonemic subtraction presented medium difficulty and phoneme identification was considered a difficult task. For the group of nonreaders, syllabic segmentation was considered an easy task; syllabic judgment presented medium difficulty, and syllabic transposition, phonemic subtraction and phoneme identification were considered very difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the experience with reading influences the performance of children in linguistic and cognitive tasks. The performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness assessments indicates the importance of taking into account not only the required level of linguistic segmentation but also the cognitive level required by the nature of the task.</p>","PeriodicalId":74581,"journal":{"name":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","volume":"21 2","pages":"113-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.\",\"authors\":\"Renata Mousinho,&nbsp;Jane Correa\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>investigation of linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>to evaluate the performance of readers and nonreaders in tasks related to several linguistic and cognitive skills and to determine the implication of the results to the clinical practice and to eduaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>participants of the study were 35 children in the process of alphabetization. The children were given tasks designed to assess their cognitive and linguistic abilities. The group of nonreaders was composed by 20 children who did not read any of the words presented on a list of 24 items. The group of readers included 15 children who read nearly every word presented on the same list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the group of readers presented a better performance on the following tasks: language development assessment; alphanumeric rapid automatized naming and working memory. There was a great variability in the performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness tasks. For the group of readers, syllabic judgment and segmentation tasks were considered easy or very easy; syllabic transposition and phonemic subtraction presented medium difficulty and phoneme identification was considered a difficult task. For the group of nonreaders, syllabic segmentation was considered an easy task; syllabic judgment presented medium difficulty, and syllabic transposition, phonemic subtraction and phoneme identification were considered very difficult.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the experience with reading influences the performance of children in linguistic and cognitive tasks. The performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness assessments indicates the importance of taking into account not only the required level of linguistic segmentation but also the cognitive level required by the nature of the task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"113-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-56872009000200005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

背景:阅读者和非阅读者的语言和认知技能的调查。目的:评估阅读者和非阅读者在与几种语言和认知技能相关的任务中的表现,并确定结果对临床实践和教育的意义。方法:以35名正在进行字母排序的儿童为研究对象。孩子们被分配了一些旨在评估他们认知和语言能力的任务。不阅读组由20个孩子组成,他们没有阅读24个项目清单上的任何一个单词。这组读者包括15个孩子,他们几乎阅读了同一列表上的每个单词。结果:阅读组在以下任务中表现出更好的表现:语言发展评估;字母数字快速自动命名和工作记忆。阅读者和非阅读者在语音意识任务中的表现存在很大差异。对于阅读组,音节判断和切分任务被认为是容易或非常容易的;音节置换和音位减法难度中等,音位识别难度较大。对于非阅读组,音节分割被认为是一项简单的任务;音节判断呈现中等难度,音节换位、音位减法和音位识别被认为是非常困难的。结论:阅读体验影响儿童在语言和认知任务中的表现。阅读者和非阅读者在语音意识评估中的表现表明,不仅要考虑语言分割的要求水平,而且要考虑任务性质所要求的认知水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.

Background: investigation of linguistic and cognitive skills in readers and nonreaders.

Aim: to evaluate the performance of readers and nonreaders in tasks related to several linguistic and cognitive skills and to determine the implication of the results to the clinical practice and to eduaction.

Method: participants of the study were 35 children in the process of alphabetization. The children were given tasks designed to assess their cognitive and linguistic abilities. The group of nonreaders was composed by 20 children who did not read any of the words presented on a list of 24 items. The group of readers included 15 children who read nearly every word presented on the same list.

Results: the group of readers presented a better performance on the following tasks: language development assessment; alphanumeric rapid automatized naming and working memory. There was a great variability in the performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness tasks. For the group of readers, syllabic judgment and segmentation tasks were considered easy or very easy; syllabic transposition and phonemic subtraction presented medium difficulty and phoneme identification was considered a difficult task. For the group of nonreaders, syllabic segmentation was considered an easy task; syllabic judgment presented medium difficulty, and syllabic transposition, phonemic subtraction and phoneme identification were considered very difficult.

Conclusion: the experience with reading influences the performance of children in linguistic and cognitive tasks. The performance of readers and nonreaders in the phonological awareness assessments indicates the importance of taking into account not only the required level of linguistic segmentation but also the cognitive level required by the nature of the task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信